Pedestrian Signal Safety - AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety
Pedestrian Signal Safety - AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety
Pedestrian Signal Safety - AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
PCD <strong>Signal</strong> Start/End Times<br />
Start of the FDW; Onset of<br />
the vehicular yellow<br />
interval<br />
9%<br />
Start of the FDW; End of the<br />
FDW<br />
62% [2003 MUTCD Compliant]<br />
Start of the FDW; Onset of<br />
the vehicular red interval<br />
1%<br />
Start of the FDW; during<br />
the steady don’t walk<br />
3% [2003 MUTCD<br />
Compliant]<br />
Start of the FDW; during<br />
yellow and all red<br />
1%<br />
Start of Walk; End of FDW<br />
17%<br />
Start of Walk; Onset of<br />
vehicular yellow<br />
5%<br />
Start of Walk; Onset of<br />
vehicular red<br />
1%<br />
Start of Walk; During<br />
Steady Don't Walk<br />
1%<br />
Figure A-8.<br />
DO<br />
<strong>Pedestrian</strong><br />
PEDESTRIAN<br />
countdown<br />
COUNTDOWN<br />
signal start/end<br />
SIGNALS<br />
times.<br />
PROVIDE A HIGHER LEVEL OF<br />
SERVICE?<br />
DO PEDESTRIAN COUNTDOWN SIGNALS PROVIDE A HIGHER LEVEL OF SERVICE?<br />
Figure A-9 shows that there was a definite split of opinion or, perhaps, an<br />
Figure A-9 acknowledgment shows that there was that a additional definite split research of opinion is needed or, perhaps, in this area. an acknowledgment Twenty-five that<br />
additional research<br />
percent of<br />
is<br />
respondents<br />
needed in this<br />
indicated<br />
area. Twenty-five<br />
they did not<br />
percent<br />
know the<br />
of respondents<br />
answer to the<br />
indicated<br />
question.<br />
they did not<br />
know the answer<br />
The split<br />
to the<br />
between<br />
question.<br />
“yes”<br />
The<br />
and<br />
split<br />
“no”<br />
between<br />
to this question<br />
“yes” and<br />
was<br />
“no”<br />
43<br />
to<br />
percent<br />
this question<br />
and 29<br />
was<br />
percent,<br />
43 percent<br />
respectively. An additional 3 percent indicated “yes and no” or “possibly.”<br />
and 29 percent, respectively. An additional 3 percent indicated “yes and no” or “possibly.”<br />
It appears that the respondents had difficulties understanding what the project<br />
It appears that the respondents had difficulties understanding what the project team was referring to<br />
team was referring to as a “higher LOS.” Traditional pedestrian LOS can be<br />
as a “higher<br />
thought<br />
LOS.” Traditional<br />
of as the density<br />
pedestrian<br />
of pedestrians<br />
LOS can be<br />
around<br />
thought<br />
you<br />
of<br />
and<br />
as<br />
the<br />
the<br />
amount<br />
density of<br />
of<br />
pedestrians<br />
space you<br />
around<br />
you and the<br />
have<br />
amount<br />
relative<br />
of space<br />
to a sidewalk,<br />
you have<br />
crosswalk,<br />
relative to<br />
or<br />
a sidewalk,<br />
pedestrian<br />
crosswalk,<br />
access route.<br />
or pedestrian access route.<br />
Figure A-9. Do pedestrian countdown signals encourage pedestrians to begin<br />
crossing the street during the flashing DON’T WALK interval?<br />
119<br />
105