Pedestrian Signal Safety - AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety
Pedestrian Signal Safety - AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety
Pedestrian Signal Safety - AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Minneapolis/St.Paul, Minnesota<br />
Figure 9 and Table 17 show the total intersection LOS and ADPV <strong>for</strong> the Minneapolis/St. Paul,<br />
Minnesota case study intersection under various peak-hour traffic volume and pedestrian walking<br />
speed scenarios. Table D-10 in Appendix D shows the intersection operational and geometric<br />
characteristics <strong>for</strong> the Minneapolis/St. Paul case study intersection.<br />
When existing volume conditions were compared to a modeled increase of 10 percent above<br />
existing volume conditions, there was a decrease of one LOS designation (from LOS C to D) with<br />
a corresponding increase in ADPV of 14 sec. under the 3.00 ft./sec. walking speed scenario. An<br />
incremental increase of another 5 percent of peak-hour volume to the 3.00 ft./sec. walking speed<br />
lowered the LOS from D to E and added 7 sec. to the ADPV. Thus, from existing volume conditions<br />
to a modeled increase of 15 percent over existing volumes, there was a reduction of two LOS<br />
designations (from LOS C to E) and a corresponding increase of approximately 21 sec. <strong>for</strong> the ADPV.<br />
Under the 3.50 ft./sec. and 4.00 ft./sec. walking speed scenarios, under existing volumes to an<br />
increase of 15 percent above existing volumes, there was no change in LOS (LOS C remained the<br />
same); however, there was a corresponding increase in ADPV of approximately 5 sec. and 4 sec.<br />
under the 3.50 ft./sec. and 4.00 ft./sec. walking speed scenarios, respectively.<br />
In summary, the 3.00 ft./sec. pedestrian walking speed, compared to the 3.50 ft./sec. and 4.00 ft./sec.<br />
pedestrian walking speeds, had a greater negative impact on vehicular traffic operations at the case<br />
study intersection.<br />
A discussion of LOS and AVD <strong>for</strong> the major and minor approaches is included in Appendix D to this<br />
report. Table D-11 and Figures D-5, D-6, and D-7 in Appendix D show intersection delay <strong>for</strong> major and<br />
minor street approaches at walking speeds of 3.00, 3.50, and 4.00 ft./sec. at the Minneapolis/St. Paul<br />
case study intersection.<br />
Figure 9. Delay vs. volumes at Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota case study intersection <strong>for</strong> walking<br />
speeds of 3.00, 3.50, 4.00 ft./sec. and base conditions.<br />
67