07.12.2012 Views

Pedestrian Signal Safety - AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety

Pedestrian Signal Safety - AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety

Pedestrian Signal Safety - AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Minneapolis/St.Paul, Minnesota<br />

Figure 9 and Table 17 show the total intersection LOS and ADPV <strong>for</strong> the Minneapolis/St. Paul,<br />

Minnesota case study intersection under various peak-hour traffic volume and pedestrian walking<br />

speed scenarios. Table D-10 in Appendix D shows the intersection operational and geometric<br />

characteristics <strong>for</strong> the Minneapolis/St. Paul case study intersection.<br />

When existing volume conditions were compared to a modeled increase of 10 percent above<br />

existing volume conditions, there was a decrease of one LOS designation (from LOS C to D) with<br />

a corresponding increase in ADPV of 14 sec. under the 3.00 ft./sec. walking speed scenario. An<br />

incremental increase of another 5 percent of peak-hour volume to the 3.00 ft./sec. walking speed<br />

lowered the LOS from D to E and added 7 sec. to the ADPV. Thus, from existing volume conditions<br />

to a modeled increase of 15 percent over existing volumes, there was a reduction of two LOS<br />

designations (from LOS C to E) and a corresponding increase of approximately 21 sec. <strong>for</strong> the ADPV.<br />

Under the 3.50 ft./sec. and 4.00 ft./sec. walking speed scenarios, under existing volumes to an<br />

increase of 15 percent above existing volumes, there was no change in LOS (LOS C remained the<br />

same); however, there was a corresponding increase in ADPV of approximately 5 sec. and 4 sec.<br />

under the 3.50 ft./sec. and 4.00 ft./sec. walking speed scenarios, respectively.<br />

In summary, the 3.00 ft./sec. pedestrian walking speed, compared to the 3.50 ft./sec. and 4.00 ft./sec.<br />

pedestrian walking speeds, had a greater negative impact on vehicular traffic operations at the case<br />

study intersection.<br />

A discussion of LOS and AVD <strong>for</strong> the major and minor approaches is included in Appendix D to this<br />

report. Table D-11 and Figures D-5, D-6, and D-7 in Appendix D show intersection delay <strong>for</strong> major and<br />

minor street approaches at walking speeds of 3.00, 3.50, and 4.00 ft./sec. at the Minneapolis/St. Paul<br />

case study intersection.<br />

Figure 9. Delay vs. volumes at Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota case study intersection <strong>for</strong> walking<br />

speeds of 3.00, 3.50, 4.00 ft./sec. and base conditions.<br />

67

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!