07.12.2012 Views

Pedestrian Signal Safety - AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety

Pedestrian Signal Safety - AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety

Pedestrian Signal Safety - AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

226<br />

• There was a slightly larger percentage of pedestrians left in the intersection at PCD signals <strong>for</strong><br />

younger pedestrians. However, this was based on a very small sample size.<br />

• Surveyed pedestrians generally preferred the PCD signal to traditional signals, with 90 percent<br />

of pedestrians understanding the indication.<br />

• Operational analysis:<br />

o Total intersection volume was estimated at 6,500 peak-hour vehicles, with 2,000<br />

vehicles and 1,250 vehicles on the major and minor street approaches, respectively.<br />

This approach produced more of a saturated/lower LOS condition at a “base” level<br />

scenario similar to the base condition LOS at the Montgomery County, Maryland case<br />

study intersection.<br />

o Under the 3.00 ft./sec. walking speed scenario when existing volume conditions were<br />

compared to the modeled increase of 15 percent above existing volume conditions,<br />

there was a reduction of two LOS designations (from LOS D to LOS F) and a<br />

corresponding increase in 122 sec. <strong>for</strong> ADPV. A similar result occurred under the 3.50<br />

ft./sec. walking speed scenario, where the total intersection LOS decreased from LOS D<br />

to LOS F and there was a corresponding increase in 108 sec. in ADPV.<br />

o At the 4.00 ft./sec. pedestrian walking speed scenario, the total increase in average<br />

intersection delay per vehicle from the existing volume condition level to the 15 percent<br />

above existing volume condition level was 28 sec. and there was a reduction of one<br />

LOS designation, from LOS E to LOS F. Note that the difference in the ADPV between<br />

the 15 percent above existing volume condition and the existing volume condition at the<br />

3.00 ft./sec. and 3.50 ft./sec. pedestrian walking speed scenarios was 94 sec. and 80<br />

sec., respectively.<br />

o The total intersection traffic volume range modeled in White Plains, New York was<br />

the lowest compared to the six case study intersections (approximately 1,600 to<br />

2,100 peak-hour vehicles). The highest total intersection traffic volume modeled was<br />

in Orange County, Cali<strong>for</strong>nia, where the case study intersection exhibited a range of<br />

approximately 5,900 to 7,600 peak-hour vehicles.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!