07.12.2012 Views

Pedestrian Signal Safety - AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety

Pedestrian Signal Safety - AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety

Pedestrian Signal Safety - AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Table G-13. Salt Lake City, Utah intersection level of service under various peak-hour traffic volume<br />

and pedestrian walking speed scenarios.<br />

SUMMARY<br />

Walking speed<br />

scenario<br />

-10 percent<br />

volume<br />

LOS (and average delay, in sec.)<br />

Existing<br />

volume<br />

+5 percent<br />

volume<br />

+10 percent<br />

volume<br />

+15 percent<br />

volume<br />

3.00 ft./sec. C (23) C (24) C (25) C (22) C (26)<br />

3.50 ft./sec. C (26) C (24) C (24) C (25) C (26)<br />

4.00 ft./sec. C (21) C (22) C (23) C (24) C (25)<br />

Major street LOS (and average delay, in sec.)<br />

3.00 ft./sec. C (26) C (25) C (29) C (28) C (29)<br />

3.50 ft./sec. C (25) C (26) C (27) C (27) C (29)<br />

4.00 ft./sec. C (21) C (23) C (23) C (24) C (25)<br />

Minor street LOS (and average delay, in sec.)<br />

3.00 ft./sec. B (18) C (21) B (19) C (21) C (22)<br />

3.50 ft./sec. B (19) B (20)* B (20)* C (21) B (20)*<br />

4.00 ft./sec. C (21) C (22) C (22) C (23) C (24)<br />

There were different environments between the two intersections with traditional signals and the<br />

two intersections with countdown signals, which may account <strong>for</strong> differences in observed pedestrian<br />

activity. With this caveat, the key results are as follows <strong>for</strong> Salt Lake City:<br />

• MWS <strong>for</strong> younger pedestrians was 4.90 ft./sec. at the two TPS and 5.30 ft./sec. at the two PCD<br />

signals. This difference was statistically significant.<br />

• MWS <strong>for</strong> older pedestrians was 4.20 ft./sec. at the two TPS and 4.30 ft./sec. at the two PCD<br />

signals. This difference was not statistically significant.<br />

• MWS <strong>for</strong> older pedestrians was generally slower than <strong>for</strong> younger pedestrians by about<br />

0.70 ft./sec. at traditional intersections and 1.00 ft./sec. at PCD intersections. The difference<br />

in walking speeds between the two age groups was significant at both PCD signals and<br />

traditional signals.<br />

• <strong>Pedestrian</strong>s with mobility impairments and without motorized or standard wheelchairs had<br />

appreciably slower walking speeds—their mean was 3.60 ft./sec. compared to about 4.20 ft./<br />

sec. <strong>for</strong> older pedestrians. A small sample size is recognized.<br />

• Older pedestrians had a slower start-up time, but this will vary by intersection and leg of<br />

intersection.<br />

• A higher level of compliance (entering crosswalk on WALK display) was found with TPS with<br />

younger pedestrians than with PCD signals. The reverse was true <strong>for</strong> older pedestrians.<br />

207

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!