Pedestrian Signal Safety - AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety
Pedestrian Signal Safety - AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety
Pedestrian Signal Safety - AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Table G-13. Salt Lake City, Utah intersection level of service under various peak-hour traffic volume<br />
and pedestrian walking speed scenarios.<br />
SUMMARY<br />
Walking speed<br />
scenario<br />
-10 percent<br />
volume<br />
LOS (and average delay, in sec.)<br />
Existing<br />
volume<br />
+5 percent<br />
volume<br />
+10 percent<br />
volume<br />
+15 percent<br />
volume<br />
3.00 ft./sec. C (23) C (24) C (25) C (22) C (26)<br />
3.50 ft./sec. C (26) C (24) C (24) C (25) C (26)<br />
4.00 ft./sec. C (21) C (22) C (23) C (24) C (25)<br />
Major street LOS (and average delay, in sec.)<br />
3.00 ft./sec. C (26) C (25) C (29) C (28) C (29)<br />
3.50 ft./sec. C (25) C (26) C (27) C (27) C (29)<br />
4.00 ft./sec. C (21) C (23) C (23) C (24) C (25)<br />
Minor street LOS (and average delay, in sec.)<br />
3.00 ft./sec. B (18) C (21) B (19) C (21) C (22)<br />
3.50 ft./sec. B (19) B (20)* B (20)* C (21) B (20)*<br />
4.00 ft./sec. C (21) C (22) C (22) C (23) C (24)<br />
There were different environments between the two intersections with traditional signals and the<br />
two intersections with countdown signals, which may account <strong>for</strong> differences in observed pedestrian<br />
activity. With this caveat, the key results are as follows <strong>for</strong> Salt Lake City:<br />
• MWS <strong>for</strong> younger pedestrians was 4.90 ft./sec. at the two TPS and 5.30 ft./sec. at the two PCD<br />
signals. This difference was statistically significant.<br />
• MWS <strong>for</strong> older pedestrians was 4.20 ft./sec. at the two TPS and 4.30 ft./sec. at the two PCD<br />
signals. This difference was not statistically significant.<br />
• MWS <strong>for</strong> older pedestrians was generally slower than <strong>for</strong> younger pedestrians by about<br />
0.70 ft./sec. at traditional intersections and 1.00 ft./sec. at PCD intersections. The difference<br />
in walking speeds between the two age groups was significant at both PCD signals and<br />
traditional signals.<br />
• <strong>Pedestrian</strong>s with mobility impairments and without motorized or standard wheelchairs had<br />
appreciably slower walking speeds—their mean was 3.60 ft./sec. compared to about 4.20 ft./<br />
sec. <strong>for</strong> older pedestrians. A small sample size is recognized.<br />
• Older pedestrians had a slower start-up time, but this will vary by intersection and leg of<br />
intersection.<br />
• A higher level of compliance (entering crosswalk on WALK display) was found with TPS with<br />
younger pedestrians than with PCD signals. The reverse was true <strong>for</strong> older pedestrians.<br />
207