- Page 1:
Pedestrian Signal Safety for Older
- Page 5 and 6:
LIST OF TABLES Table/Page ES-1/19.
- Page 7:
LIST OF FIGURES Figure/Page 1/22. E
- Page 11 and 12:
LIST OF DEFINITIONS Access Board Th
- Page 13:
FOREWORD ABOUT THE SPONSOR This stu
- Page 16 and 17:
16 Mark J. Kulewicz Director-Traffi
- Page 18 and 19:
18 LITERATURE REVIEW FINDINGS • O
- Page 20 and 21:
20 1. Based on the results observed
- Page 22 and 23:
22 Figure 1. Example of a pedestria
- Page 25 and 26:
METHODS The project objectives were
- Page 27 and 28:
and 3.40 ft./sec. for pedestrians o
- Page 29 and 30:
the potential impact of various wal
- Page 31 and 32:
Pedestrian Start-Up Time Pedestrian
- Page 33 and 34:
• a PCD signal with both the coun
- Page 35 and 36:
six crosswalks experienced a signif
- Page 37 and 38:
where: W = duration of WALK indicat
- Page 39 and 40:
Gates, Noyce, Bill, and Van Ee expa
- Page 41 and 42:
Table 3. Summary of empirical data
- Page 43 and 44:
Table 4. Summary of researcher reco
- Page 45 and 46:
SITE SELECTION/EFFECT OF DIFFERENT
- Page 47 and 48:
Walking Speeds The project team mea
- Page 49 and 50:
RESULTS AGENCY SURVEY FINDINGS Deta
- Page 51 and 52:
5 0 . 0 % 4 5 . 0 % 4 0 . 0 % 3 5 .
- Page 53 and 54:
POSITIVE IMPACTS OF PEDESTRIAN COUN
- Page 55 and 56:
• Give third priority to signaliz
- Page 57 and 58:
15th-Percentile Walking Speed The 1
- Page 59 and 60:
Table 10: Pedestrian signal complia
- Page 61 and 62:
Table 12. Older pedestrians remaini
- Page 63 and 64:
The case study intersections in Sal
- Page 65 and 66:
Five different traffic volume condi
- Page 67 and 68:
Minneapolis/St.Paul, Minnesota Figu
- Page 69 and 70:
Figure 10. Delay vs. volumes at Mon
- Page 71 and 72:
There was no change in overall LOS
- Page 73 and 74:
Figure 13. Delay vs. volumes at Ora
- Page 75 and 76:
Pedestrian Understanding and Prefer
- Page 77 and 78:
the countdown at the end of the FDW
- Page 79 and 80:
lengths are preferred for pedestria
- Page 81 and 82:
Table 23. Comparison of the literat
- Page 83 and 84:
observer was assigned to each inter
- Page 85 and 86:
APPENDIX A WEB-PEDESTRIAN COUNTDOWN
- Page 87 and 88:
PURPOSE OF SURVEY The purpose of th
- Page 89 and 90:
d) Plan to use during the next one
- Page 91 and 92:
Question 22 If you answered “yes
- Page 93 and 94:
Table A-1. Distribution of responde
- Page 95 and 96:
Table A-2. Respondent organizations
- Page 97 and 98:
Figure A-2 shows the distribution o
- Page 99 and 100:
6 0 .0 % 5 5 .0 % 5 0 .0 % 4 5 .0 %
- Page 101 and 102:
Figure A-7. Roadway characteristics
- Page 103 and 104:
PEDESTRIAN COUNTDOWN SIGNAL START/E
- Page 105 and 106:
PCD Signal Start/End Times Start of
- Page 107 and 108:
3. Seniors and other adults showed
- Page 109 and 110:
• No. Countdown timers encourage
- Page 111 and 112:
the crossing time remaining? Yes 20
- Page 113 and 114:
• None (n = 32) • Motorists spe
- Page 115 and 116:
PEDESTRIAN SAFETY FOR OLDER PEDESTR
- Page 117 and 118:
APPENDIX C: BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA
- Page 119 and 120:
BACKGROUND Broward County is locate
- Page 121 and 122:
DATA COLLECTION METHODOLOGY Pedestr
- Page 123 and 124:
For younger pedestrians, the mean w
- Page 125 and 126:
Pedestrians Under 65 Table C-6 show
- Page 127 and 128:
Pedestrians Left in Intersection At
- Page 129 and 130:
Table C-11. Pedestrian WALK and cle
- Page 131 and 132:
Figure C-2. Delay vs. volumes at ca
- Page 133 and 134:
Table C-13. Broward County, Florida
- Page 135 and 136:
APPENDIX D: MINNEAPOLIS/ST. PAUL, M
- Page 137 and 138:
BACKGROUND Minneapolis, in southeas
- Page 139 and 140:
• Lyndale Avenue and Franklin Ave
- Page 141 and 142:
Table D-2. Walking speeds for pedes
- Page 143 and 144:
Table D-4. Significance testing of
- Page 145 and 146:
Table D-7. Frequency and percentage
- Page 147 and 148:
SURVEY RESULTS A total of 150 pedes
- Page 149 and 150:
For the major street approaches, LO
- Page 151 and 152:
3.50 ft./sec. Figure D-6. Intersect
- Page 153 and 154:
SUMMARY In summary, the key results
- Page 155 and 156:
LIST OF TABLES Table/Page E-1/156.
- Page 157 and 158:
SITE SELECTION Engineering staff fr
- Page 159 and 160:
DATA COLLECTION METHODOLOGY Pedestr
- Page 161 and 162:
For younger pedestrians, the mean w
- Page 163 and 164:
Twenty-two pedestrians with mobilit
- Page 165 and 166:
Older Pedestrians Table E-8 shows t
- Page 167 and 168:
EFFECT OF CHANGING WALKING SPEEDS O
- Page 169 and 170:
As shown in Table E-12, major stree
- Page 171 and 172:
3.50 ft./sec. Figure E-6. Intersect
- Page 173 and 174: SUMMARY In summary, the key results
- Page 175 and 176: LIST OF TABLES Table/Page F-1/176.
- Page 177 and 178: SITE SELECTION The City of White Pl
- Page 179 and 180: RESULTS Walking Speeds The walking
- Page 181 and 182: For younger pedestrians, the mean w
- Page 183 and 184: cross. That is, at an intersection
- Page 185 and 186: Pedestrians Left in Intersection At
- Page 187 and 188: Table F-11. Pedestrian WALK and cle
- Page 189 and 190: Table F-13. White Plains, New York:
- Page 191 and 192: APPENDIX G: SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH CA
- Page 193 and 194: BACKGROUND Salt Lake City is Utah
- Page 195 and 196: Figure G-2 displays the type of ped
- Page 197 and 198: Table G-2. Walking speeds for pedes
- Page 199 and 200: Pedestrians with Impairments Pedest
- Page 201 and 202: Older Pedestrians Table G-8 shows t
- Page 203 and 204: EFFECT OF CHANGING WALKING SPEEDS O
- Page 205 and 206: Figure G-3. Delay vs. volumes at ca
- Page 207 and 208: Table G-13. Salt Lake City, Utah in
- Page 209 and 210: APPENDIX H: ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORN
- Page 211 and 212: BACKGROUND Orange County, Californi
- Page 213 and 214: DATA COLLECTION METHODOLOGY Pedestr
- Page 215 and 216: For younger pedestrians, the mean w
- Page 217 and 218: Younger Pedestrians Table H-6 shows
- Page 219 and 220: Pedestrians Left in Intersection At
- Page 221 and 222: Figure H-2 shows the overall averag
- Page 223: Figure H-2. Delay vs. volumes at ca
- Page 227 and 228: APPENDIX I: MONROE COUNTY, NEW YORK
- Page 229 and 230: COUNTY OF MONROE DEPARTMENT OF TRAN
- Page 231 and 232: APPENDIX J: NATIONAL COMMITTEE ON U
- Page 233 and 234: 3. Add a new Guidance statement rec
- Page 235 and 236: Guidance: Where the pedestrian clea
- Page 237 and 238: Fugger, T.F., B.C. Randles, A.C. St