07.12.2012 Views

Pedestrian Signal Safety - AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety

Pedestrian Signal Safety - AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety

Pedestrian Signal Safety - AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

SITE SELECTION<br />

The City of White Plains maintains 132 signalized intersections, of which 101 have pedestrian signals.<br />

White Plains began installing pedestrian countdown (PCD) signals in its jurisdiction in December<br />

2003. At the time of the study, it had signals installed at 15 intersections, mainly in its central business<br />

district, where there was a large volume of pedestrians. The signals were compliant with the Manual<br />

on Uni<strong>for</strong>m <strong>Traffic</strong> Control Devices (MUTCD) and displayed the countdown during the flashing DON’T<br />

WALK (FDW) interval.<br />

Walking speed was used as part of the calculation to determine the pedestrian signal intervals,<br />

varying between 3.00 and 4.00 feet/second (ft./sec.), depending on the presence of schools and<br />

known older populations. The city concentrated its placement of PCD signals at high-volume/<br />

high-pedestrian intersections with long crossing distances. There were no <strong>for</strong>mal criteria <strong>for</strong> defining<br />

high volume or long crossing distances; city engineers used their judgment regarding which<br />

intersections were longer or had high volumes.<br />

White Plains Commissioner of <strong>Traffic</strong> Thomas Soyk recommended 20 intersections <strong>for</strong> the study,<br />

including intersections equipped with PCD signals and with traditional pedestrian signals (TPS). Soyk<br />

selected intersections that had high pedestrian volumes and had been counted <strong>for</strong> pedestrian and<br />

vehicle volume in the last few years. The project engineer reviewed these 20 intersections <strong>for</strong> the<br />

following aspects:<br />

• pedestrian volumes, particularly older pedestrian volumes;<br />

• lack of any construction or other temporary impediments (such as street closures) that may<br />

affect pedestrian behavior;<br />

• ability to sufficiently collect data (such as utility poles located close to the intersection);<br />

• conventional intersection design; and<br />

• surrounding land use.<br />

Based on field observations, discussions with the engineering staff, and the recommendations of the<br />

<strong>AAA</strong> representative, four intersections were selected <strong>for</strong> the study:<br />

• Mamaroneck Avenue and Martine Avenue (countdown);<br />

• Mamaroneck Avenue and Maple Avenue (countdown);<br />

• Mamaroneck Avenue and Post Avenue (traditional); and<br />

• Hamilton Avenue and Church Street (traditional).<br />

Figure F-2 displays the type of pedestrian signal at each of the four intersections. As shown, the<br />

intersections were in close proximity to one another, with the farthest two intersections only one-halfmile<br />

apart. The intersections all were located in the White Plains central business district, which was<br />

characterized by office buildings and commercial storefronts.<br />

177

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!