Pedestrian Signal Safety - AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety
Pedestrian Signal Safety - AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety
Pedestrian Signal Safety - AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
92<br />
RESULTS OF PEDESTRIAN SIGNAL SURVEY<br />
Purpose of Survey<br />
The purpose of the survey of governmental organizations was to identify the state of the art and<br />
state of the practice in pedestrian signal timing and the use of pedestrian signals. This Web-based<br />
survey had as its objective the development of a body of knowledge on walking speeds as they relate<br />
to special user populations, including older persons. The project team also requested in<strong>for</strong>mation<br />
regarding PCD signals, including comprehension, number of countdown signals, advantages,<br />
and challenges.<br />
Survey Methodology<br />
The e-mail survey was conducted between June 17 and June 29, 2004. There were 1,140 invitees.<br />
Invitees comprised members of the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) employed in a public<br />
agency either at the local (city, county, or township) or state level. There were 599 visits to the<br />
electronic survey (53 percent of invitees viewed the survey), with an overall response rate of 16<br />
percent (n = 182 responses).<br />
As would be expected, not all responses contained answers to every question. ITE understood the<br />
need <strong>for</strong> privacy <strong>for</strong> some organizations and the hesitancy of some respondents to provide data.<br />
Question 1 requested that the respondents indicate the level of privacy desired in exchange <strong>for</strong><br />
completing the survey. A total of 43 respondents requested complete anonymity in terms of any<br />
publication or summary in<strong>for</strong>mation that might contain in<strong>for</strong>mation related to their jurisdiction.<br />
SURVEY DEMOGRAPHICS<br />
Table A-1 shows the distribution of respondents by agency/organization type. As shown, more<br />
than half (54.2 percent) of the respondents were employed by U.S. city governmental agencies.<br />
Approximately 14 percent of the respondents worked <strong>for</strong> county or combined city/county<br />
governmental organizations. Combined, almost seven of 10 respondents (115 of<br />
the 168 respondents) worked <strong>for</strong> local governmental organizations. Almost 20 percent of the<br />
respondents (n = 31) were employed at state departments of transportation. Non-U.S. respondents<br />
included Canadian cities and provinces (17, or 10.2 percent) and international cities and provinces (5,<br />
or 3.0 percent).<br />
Figure A-1 shows the 41 states where survey respondents were employed. The numbers included<br />
in Figure A-1 (1/1) represent the number of jurisdictions or organizations that responded from a<br />
particular state and the number of jurisdictions or organizations that have PCD signals in place.