07.12.2012 Views

Pedestrian Signal Safety - AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety

Pedestrian Signal Safety - AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety

Pedestrian Signal Safety - AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

144<br />

Observations were recorded <strong>for</strong> pedestrians at the minor approach of University and Snelling. Based<br />

on a sample of 100 younger pedestrians, younger pedestrians had a start-up time of 2.10 sec. at this<br />

crossing. Based on a sample of 19 older pedestrians at the same crossing, older pedestrians had a<br />

start-up time of 2.90 sec. This is a difference of 0.80 sec.<br />

Compliance<br />

<strong>Pedestrian</strong>s at each intersection were observed during two hours of peak vehicle and pedestrian<br />

activity using the PATH system. For each pedestrian, observers recorded the pedestrian signal<br />

indication (WALK, FDW, or DW) that was displayed when the pedestrian entered the intersection.<br />

Observations were recorded separately <strong>for</strong> younger pedestrians and those 65 and older.<br />

Observations were recorded during the three hours of peak vehicle activity because vehicle volumes<br />

at intersections likely affect pedestrian compliance to the signal. This is related to the opportunity to<br />

cross. That is, at an intersection with low vehicle volume, pedestrians are more likely to violate the<br />

pedestrian signal because there are more available crossing gaps.<br />

<strong>Pedestrian</strong>s Under 65<br />

Table D-6 shows the frequency and percentage of younger pedestrians entering during each signal<br />

indication <strong>for</strong> two intersections equipped with TPS.<br />

Table D-6. Frequency and percentage of younger pedestrians entering during the WALK, flashing<br />

DON’T WALK, or DON’T WALK indication at traditional signals in Minneapolis and St. Paul,<br />

Minnesota.<br />

Intersection Leg<br />

WALK FDW DW<br />

Frequency Percent Frequency Percent Frequency Percent<br />

Lyndale and<br />

Franklin<br />

(traditional)<br />

Major<br />

Minor<br />

80<br />

52<br />

84<br />

63<br />

14<br />

7<br />

15<br />

9<br />

1<br />

23<br />

1<br />

28<br />

University and<br />

Hamline<br />

(traditional)<br />

Major<br />

Minor<br />

8<br />

21<br />

44<br />

75<br />

3<br />

5<br />

17<br />

18<br />

7<br />

2<br />

39<br />

7<br />

Total at traditional<br />

signals<br />

161 72 29 13 33 15<br />

The compliance <strong>for</strong> younger pedestrians at traditional signals varied from 44 percent to 84 percent<br />

entering during the WALK indication. When the four intersection legs were considered together, 72<br />

percent entered during the WALK indication.<br />

Table D-7 shows the frequency and percentage of younger pedestrians entering during each signal<br />

indication <strong>for</strong> the two intersections equipped with PCD signals. As with the traditional intersections,<br />

the compliance varied by intersection and leg from 36 percent to 76 percent. The combined<br />

percentage was slightly lower (62 percent) than at traditional signals.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!