Pedestrian Signal Safety - AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety
Pedestrian Signal Safety - AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety
Pedestrian Signal Safety - AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
144<br />
Observations were recorded <strong>for</strong> pedestrians at the minor approach of University and Snelling. Based<br />
on a sample of 100 younger pedestrians, younger pedestrians had a start-up time of 2.10 sec. at this<br />
crossing. Based on a sample of 19 older pedestrians at the same crossing, older pedestrians had a<br />
start-up time of 2.90 sec. This is a difference of 0.80 sec.<br />
Compliance<br />
<strong>Pedestrian</strong>s at each intersection were observed during two hours of peak vehicle and pedestrian<br />
activity using the PATH system. For each pedestrian, observers recorded the pedestrian signal<br />
indication (WALK, FDW, or DW) that was displayed when the pedestrian entered the intersection.<br />
Observations were recorded separately <strong>for</strong> younger pedestrians and those 65 and older.<br />
Observations were recorded during the three hours of peak vehicle activity because vehicle volumes<br />
at intersections likely affect pedestrian compliance to the signal. This is related to the opportunity to<br />
cross. That is, at an intersection with low vehicle volume, pedestrians are more likely to violate the<br />
pedestrian signal because there are more available crossing gaps.<br />
<strong>Pedestrian</strong>s Under 65<br />
Table D-6 shows the frequency and percentage of younger pedestrians entering during each signal<br />
indication <strong>for</strong> two intersections equipped with TPS.<br />
Table D-6. Frequency and percentage of younger pedestrians entering during the WALK, flashing<br />
DON’T WALK, or DON’T WALK indication at traditional signals in Minneapolis and St. Paul,<br />
Minnesota.<br />
Intersection Leg<br />
WALK FDW DW<br />
Frequency Percent Frequency Percent Frequency Percent<br />
Lyndale and<br />
Franklin<br />
(traditional)<br />
Major<br />
Minor<br />
80<br />
52<br />
84<br />
63<br />
14<br />
7<br />
15<br />
9<br />
1<br />
23<br />
1<br />
28<br />
University and<br />
Hamline<br />
(traditional)<br />
Major<br />
Minor<br />
8<br />
21<br />
44<br />
75<br />
3<br />
5<br />
17<br />
18<br />
7<br />
2<br />
39<br />
7<br />
Total at traditional<br />
signals<br />
161 72 29 13 33 15<br />
The compliance <strong>for</strong> younger pedestrians at traditional signals varied from 44 percent to 84 percent<br />
entering during the WALK indication. When the four intersection legs were considered together, 72<br />
percent entered during the WALK indication.<br />
Table D-7 shows the frequency and percentage of younger pedestrians entering during each signal<br />
indication <strong>for</strong> the two intersections equipped with PCD signals. As with the traditional intersections,<br />
the compliance varied by intersection and leg from 36 percent to 76 percent. The combined<br />
percentage was slightly lower (62 percent) than at traditional signals.