Pedestrian Signal Safety - AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety
Pedestrian Signal Safety - AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety
Pedestrian Signal Safety - AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
SURVEY RESULTS<br />
A total of 150 pedestrians were surveyed in the Minneapolis and St. Paul area, including 16<br />
pedestrians 65 and older. <strong>Pedestrian</strong>s were intercepted after they completed their crossing at<br />
countdown-equipped intersections and asked if they would like to participate in a brief survey on<br />
pedestrian safety. <strong>Pedestrian</strong>s were asked if they noticed anything different about crossing at this<br />
intersection than at similar intersections in the Minneapolis/St. Paul area. A follow-up question<br />
confirmed that the difference noted was the countdown signal. Ninety-three (approximately 62<br />
percent) of the pedestrians noticed the PCD signals.<br />
All surveyed pedestrians were asked to explain the meaning of the countdown indication.<br />
Approximately 93 percent (140 out of 150) provided a satisfactory explanation of the countdown<br />
indication. Of those pedestrians who had a preference regarding the use of TPS or countdown<br />
signals, only 25 percent preferred PCD signals. However, approximately 75 percent of all pedestrians<br />
surveyed indicated that the PCD signal was helpful in crossing the street safely. Many of those<br />
surveyed who preferred the traditional signal noted that the PCD signal did not provide enough time<br />
to cross.<br />
EFFECT OF CHANGING WALKING SPEEDS ON PEDESTRIAN CLEARANCE TIMES<br />
Table D-10 displays the required pedestrian signal times <strong>for</strong> different walking speeds and the time<br />
available <strong>for</strong> that movement at each of the intersections studied. Table D-10 presents the ˝symbol<br />
where the total pedestrian signal time exceeded the available minimum green time. Key findings<br />
related to pedestrian WALK clearance time durations <strong>for</strong> the case study intersections included:<br />
• The pedestrian intervals exceeded the available green times <strong>for</strong> the 3.00 ft./sec. scenario in<br />
four of four crosswalks.<br />
• It should be noted that if this jurisdiction used the 7-sec. [minimum] WALK time recommended<br />
in the 2003 edition of the Manual on Uni<strong>for</strong>m <strong>Traffic</strong> Control Devices (MUTCD), of instead of<br />
the policy-based 12-sec. WALK time used by the City of Minneapolis, the available green time<br />
would be adequate at 3.00 ft./sec. The City’s use of a greater minimum WALK time interval in<br />
this case implies a proactive policy to provide greater level of service (LOS) to pedestrians.<br />
147