07.12.2012 Views

Pedestrian Signal Safety - AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety

Pedestrian Signal Safety - AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety

Pedestrian Signal Safety - AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

SURVEY RESULTS<br />

A total of 150 pedestrians were surveyed in the Minneapolis and St. Paul area, including 16<br />

pedestrians 65 and older. <strong>Pedestrian</strong>s were intercepted after they completed their crossing at<br />

countdown-equipped intersections and asked if they would like to participate in a brief survey on<br />

pedestrian safety. <strong>Pedestrian</strong>s were asked if they noticed anything different about crossing at this<br />

intersection than at similar intersections in the Minneapolis/St. Paul area. A follow-up question<br />

confirmed that the difference noted was the countdown signal. Ninety-three (approximately 62<br />

percent) of the pedestrians noticed the PCD signals.<br />

All surveyed pedestrians were asked to explain the meaning of the countdown indication.<br />

Approximately 93 percent (140 out of 150) provided a satisfactory explanation of the countdown<br />

indication. Of those pedestrians who had a preference regarding the use of TPS or countdown<br />

signals, only 25 percent preferred PCD signals. However, approximately 75 percent of all pedestrians<br />

surveyed indicated that the PCD signal was helpful in crossing the street safely. Many of those<br />

surveyed who preferred the traditional signal noted that the PCD signal did not provide enough time<br />

to cross.<br />

EFFECT OF CHANGING WALKING SPEEDS ON PEDESTRIAN CLEARANCE TIMES<br />

Table D-10 displays the required pedestrian signal times <strong>for</strong> different walking speeds and the time<br />

available <strong>for</strong> that movement at each of the intersections studied. Table D-10 presents the ˝symbol<br />

where the total pedestrian signal time exceeded the available minimum green time. Key findings<br />

related to pedestrian WALK clearance time durations <strong>for</strong> the case study intersections included:<br />

• The pedestrian intervals exceeded the available green times <strong>for</strong> the 3.00 ft./sec. scenario in<br />

four of four crosswalks.<br />

• It should be noted that if this jurisdiction used the 7-sec. [minimum] WALK time recommended<br />

in the 2003 edition of the Manual on Uni<strong>for</strong>m <strong>Traffic</strong> Control Devices (MUTCD), of instead of<br />

the policy-based 12-sec. WALK time used by the City of Minneapolis, the available green time<br />

would be adequate at 3.00 ft./sec. The City’s use of a greater minimum WALK time interval in<br />

this case implies a proactive policy to provide greater level of service (LOS) to pedestrians.<br />

147

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!