Pedestrian Signal Safety - AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety

LIST OF TABLES
Table/Page
ES-1/19. Increase in vehicular delay at intersections operating with level of service A to F due to
changes in walking speed (WALK interval and flashing DON’T WALK interval).
1/30. NCUTCD recommendations for MUTCD Section 4.E.10.
2/34. Percentage of pedestrians, by type, successfully completing pedestrian crossings under the
traditional and countdown signal scenarios.
3/41. Summary of empirical data on walking speeds.
4/43. Summary of researcher recommendations on pedestrian walking speeds.
5/56. Combined results of mean walking speeds for younger pedestrians.
6/56. Combined results of mean walking speeds for older pedestrians.
7/57. Combined results of 15th-percentile walking speeds.
8/58. Mean walking speeds for pedestrians with impairments, stratified by impairment.
9/58. Pedestrian signal compliance for younger pedestrians by jurisdiction for traditional and pedestrian
countdown signals.
10/59. Pedestrian signal compliance for older pedestrians by jurisdiction for traditional and pedestrian
countdown signals.
11/60. Younger pedestrians remaining in the intersection at the onset of the DON’T WALK interval.
12/61. Older pedestrians remaining in the intersection at the onset of the DON’T WALK interval.
13/61. Pedestrian start-up times for older and younger pedestrians.
14/63. Pedestrian WALK and clearance time durations for case study intersection in Minneapolis,
Minnesota.
15/64. Level of service at signalized intersections.
16/66. Broward County, Florida: Total intersection level of service (and average delay per vehicle)
under various volume and pedestrian walking speed scenarios.
17/68. Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota: Total intersection level of service (and average delay per
vehicle) under various volume and pedestrian walking speed scenarios.
18/69. Montgomery County, Maryland: Total intersection level of service (and average delay per vehicle)
under various volume and pedestrian walking speed scenarios.
5