- Page 1:
Pedestrian Signal Safety for Older
- Page 5 and 6:
LIST OF TABLES Table/Page ES-1/19.
- Page 7:
LIST OF FIGURES Figure/Page 1/22. E
- Page 11 and 12:
LIST OF DEFINITIONS Access Board Th
- Page 13:
FOREWORD ABOUT THE SPONSOR This stu
- Page 16 and 17:
16 Mark J. Kulewicz Director-Traffi
- Page 18 and 19:
18 LITERATURE REVIEW FINDINGS • O
- Page 20 and 21:
20 1. Based on the results observed
- Page 22 and 23:
22 Figure 1. Example of a pedestria
- Page 25 and 26:
METHODS The project objectives were
- Page 27 and 28:
and 3.40 ft./sec. for pedestrians o
- Page 29 and 30:
the potential impact of various wal
- Page 31 and 32:
Pedestrian Start-Up Time Pedestrian
- Page 33 and 34:
• a PCD signal with both the coun
- Page 35 and 36:
six crosswalks experienced a signif
- Page 37 and 38:
where: W = duration of WALK indicat
- Page 39 and 40:
Gates, Noyce, Bill, and Van Ee expa
- Page 41 and 42:
Table 3. Summary of empirical data
- Page 43 and 44:
Table 4. Summary of researcher reco
- Page 45 and 46:
SITE SELECTION/EFFECT OF DIFFERENT
- Page 47 and 48:
Walking Speeds The project team mea
- Page 49 and 50:
RESULTS AGENCY SURVEY FINDINGS Deta
- Page 51 and 52:
5 0 . 0 % 4 5 . 0 % 4 0 . 0 % 3 5 .
- Page 53 and 54:
POSITIVE IMPACTS OF PEDESTRIAN COUN
- Page 55 and 56:
• Give third priority to signaliz
- Page 57 and 58:
15th-Percentile Walking Speed The 1
- Page 59 and 60:
Table 10: Pedestrian signal complia
- Page 61 and 62:
Table 12. Older pedestrians remaini
- Page 63 and 64:
The case study intersections in Sal
- Page 65 and 66:
Five different traffic volume condi
- Page 67 and 68:
Minneapolis/St.Paul, Minnesota Figu
- Page 69 and 70:
Figure 10. Delay vs. volumes at Mon
- Page 71 and 72:
There was no change in overall LOS
- Page 73 and 74:
Figure 13. Delay vs. volumes at Ora
- Page 75 and 76: Pedestrian Understanding and Prefer
- Page 77 and 78: the countdown at the end of the FDW
- Page 79 and 80: lengths are preferred for pedestria
- Page 81 and 82: Table 23. Comparison of the literat
- Page 83 and 84: observer was assigned to each inter
- Page 85 and 86: APPENDIX A WEB-PEDESTRIAN COUNTDOWN
- Page 87 and 88: PURPOSE OF SURVEY The purpose of th
- Page 89 and 90: d) Plan to use during the next one
- Page 91 and 92: Question 22 If you answered “yes
- Page 93 and 94: Table A-1. Distribution of responde
- Page 95 and 96: Table A-2. Respondent organizations
- Page 97 and 98: Figure A-2 shows the distribution o
- Page 99 and 100: 6 0 .0 % 5 5 .0 % 5 0 .0 % 4 5 .0 %
- Page 101 and 102: Figure A-7. Roadway characteristics
- Page 103 and 104: PEDESTRIAN COUNTDOWN SIGNAL START/E
- Page 105 and 106: PCD Signal Start/End Times Start of
- Page 107 and 108: 3. Seniors and other adults showed
- Page 109 and 110: • No. Countdown timers encourage
- Page 111 and 112: the crossing time remaining? Yes 20
- Page 113 and 114: • None (n = 32) • Motorists spe
- Page 115 and 116: PEDESTRIAN SAFETY FOR OLDER PEDESTR
- Page 117 and 118: APPENDIX C: BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA
- Page 119 and 120: BACKGROUND Broward County is locate
- Page 121 and 122: DATA COLLECTION METHODOLOGY Pedestr
- Page 123 and 124: For younger pedestrians, the mean w
- Page 125: Pedestrians Under 65 Table C-6 show
- Page 129 and 130: Table C-11. Pedestrian WALK and cle
- Page 131 and 132: Figure C-2. Delay vs. volumes at ca
- Page 133 and 134: Table C-13. Broward County, Florida
- Page 135 and 136: APPENDIX D: MINNEAPOLIS/ST. PAUL, M
- Page 137 and 138: BACKGROUND Minneapolis, in southeas
- Page 139 and 140: • Lyndale Avenue and Franklin Ave
- Page 141 and 142: Table D-2. Walking speeds for pedes
- Page 143 and 144: Table D-4. Significance testing of
- Page 145 and 146: Table D-7. Frequency and percentage
- Page 147 and 148: SURVEY RESULTS A total of 150 pedes
- Page 149 and 150: For the major street approaches, LO
- Page 151 and 152: 3.50 ft./sec. Figure D-6. Intersect
- Page 153 and 154: SUMMARY In summary, the key results
- Page 155 and 156: LIST OF TABLES Table/Page E-1/156.
- Page 157 and 158: SITE SELECTION Engineering staff fr
- Page 159 and 160: DATA COLLECTION METHODOLOGY Pedestr
- Page 161 and 162: For younger pedestrians, the mean w
- Page 163 and 164: Twenty-two pedestrians with mobilit
- Page 165 and 166: Older Pedestrians Table E-8 shows t
- Page 167 and 168: EFFECT OF CHANGING WALKING SPEEDS O
- Page 169 and 170: As shown in Table E-12, major stree
- Page 171 and 172: 3.50 ft./sec. Figure E-6. Intersect
- Page 173 and 174: SUMMARY In summary, the key results
- Page 175 and 176: LIST OF TABLES Table/Page F-1/176.
- Page 177 and 178:
SITE SELECTION The City of White Pl
- Page 179 and 180:
RESULTS Walking Speeds The walking
- Page 181 and 182:
For younger pedestrians, the mean w
- Page 183 and 184:
cross. That is, at an intersection
- Page 185 and 186:
Pedestrians Left in Intersection At
- Page 187 and 188:
Table F-11. Pedestrian WALK and cle
- Page 189 and 190:
Table F-13. White Plains, New York:
- Page 191 and 192:
APPENDIX G: SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH CA
- Page 193 and 194:
BACKGROUND Salt Lake City is Utah
- Page 195 and 196:
Figure G-2 displays the type of ped
- Page 197 and 198:
Table G-2. Walking speeds for pedes
- Page 199 and 200:
Pedestrians with Impairments Pedest
- Page 201 and 202:
Older Pedestrians Table G-8 shows t
- Page 203 and 204:
EFFECT OF CHANGING WALKING SPEEDS O
- Page 205 and 206:
Figure G-3. Delay vs. volumes at ca
- Page 207 and 208:
Table G-13. Salt Lake City, Utah in
- Page 209 and 210:
APPENDIX H: ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORN
- Page 211 and 212:
BACKGROUND Orange County, Californi
- Page 213 and 214:
DATA COLLECTION METHODOLOGY Pedestr
- Page 215 and 216:
For younger pedestrians, the mean w
- Page 217 and 218:
Younger Pedestrians Table H-6 shows
- Page 219 and 220:
Pedestrians Left in Intersection At
- Page 221 and 222:
Figure H-2 shows the overall averag
- Page 223 and 224:
Figure H-2. Delay vs. volumes at ca
- Page 225 and 226:
Table H-13. Orange County, Californ
- Page 227 and 228:
APPENDIX I: MONROE COUNTY, NEW YORK
- Page 229 and 230:
COUNTY OF MONROE DEPARTMENT OF TRAN
- Page 231 and 232:
APPENDIX J: NATIONAL COMMITTEE ON U
- Page 233 and 234:
3. Add a new Guidance statement rec
- Page 235 and 236:
Guidance: Where the pedestrian clea
- Page 237 and 238:
Fugger, T.F., B.C. Randles, A.C. St