08.12.2012 Views

Operational Plan for the Restoration of Diadromous Fishes to the ...

Operational Plan for the Restoration of Diadromous Fishes to the ...

Operational Plan for the Restoration of Diadromous Fishes to the ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Work <strong>Plan</strong> Narratives<br />

1.1.1-1.1.3 and 2.1.1-2.1.2 Estimate <strong>the</strong> size <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> shortnose sturgeon and<br />

Atlantic sturgeon populations, identify <strong>the</strong>ir essential habitat, and complete a<br />

genetic analysis.<br />

This work was initiated by <strong>the</strong> University <strong>of</strong> Maine in 2007, and is expected <strong>to</strong> be<br />

completed in 2010. The ongoing study uses acoustic telemetry, mark-recapture<br />

techniques, DIDSON sonar, and microsatellite DNA analysis <strong>to</strong> accomplish its<br />

objectives. The study is funded by a 4-year NOAA Section 6 grant <strong>to</strong> DMR.<br />

1.1.5 and 2.1.5 Estimate <strong>the</strong> size <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> shortnose sturgeon and Atlantic<br />

sturgeon populations 20 and 40 years after Yr0.<br />

Population estimates should be made at least twice <strong>for</strong> both species after Veazie<br />

and Great Works dams are removed. Assuming that both species will be studied at<br />

<strong>the</strong> same time, <strong>the</strong> longer generation time <strong>of</strong> Atlantic sturgeon should drive <strong>the</strong><br />

timing <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> work. The shortnose sturgeon population, which overwinters in <strong>the</strong><br />

Penobscot, could be assessed on a shorter cycle (14, 28, 42 years) if current studies<br />

using sonar (DIDSON) prove <strong>to</strong> be effective.<br />

1.1.6 and 2.1.6 Reassess essential habitat 1-2 year, 20 and 40 years after Yr0.<br />

Conduct a follow-up telemetry study 1-2 years after <strong>the</strong> removal <strong>of</strong> Veazie and Great<br />

Works dams are removed <strong>to</strong> determine whe<strong>the</strong>r sturgeon are utilizing <strong>the</strong> newly<br />

accessible habitat. Studies <strong>of</strong> habitat use should be made at least twice <strong>for</strong> both<br />

species after Veazie and Great Works dams are removed. Assuming that both<br />

species will be studied at <strong>the</strong> same time, <strong>the</strong> longer generation time <strong>of</strong> Atlantic<br />

sturgeon should drive <strong>the</strong> timing <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> work.<br />

3.1.1 Document <strong>the</strong> age structure <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> existing rainbow smelt population by<br />

2012 (or prior <strong>to</strong> Yr0).<br />

The current age structure should be documented. Declines in rainbow smelt<br />

populations in Massachusetts appear <strong>to</strong> co-occur with decreases in age at first<br />

spawning.<br />

3.1.2 Estimate <strong>the</strong> size <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> rainbow smelt population in 2012(or prior <strong>to</strong> Yr0)<br />

if feasible.<br />

The most recent population estimate was developed from a mark-recapture study<br />

conducted nearly 40 years ago in conjunction with <strong>the</strong> commercial fishery. That<br />

fishery no longer exists, so a similar study would require a large amount <strong>of</strong> fishing<br />

ef<strong>for</strong>t. The existing or proposed assessment studies (rotary screw traps, beach<br />

seine survey, boat electr<strong>of</strong>ishing) may not be useful <strong>for</strong> rainbow smelt. Newer<br />

techniques (e.g. hydroacoustics) or a combination <strong>of</strong> techniques might be more<br />

efficient, but <strong>the</strong> methodology would have <strong>to</strong> be developed.<br />

PRFP Page 16

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!