Operational Plan for the Restoration of Diadromous Fishes to the ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

18.2.2 Develop Assessment Study Plans, Conduct Fish Passage Efficiency Studies, and Develop Recommendations for Upstream and Downstream Fish Passage Improvements for Juvenile and Adult Alewife and American Eel at Lake and Pond Outlets within 50 Years Lake and pond outlet dams may inhibit passage of adult alewife and juvenile eel into lakes or ponds and low outflows at outlets during the emigration of juvenile and spent adult alewives and maturing eels may impede the timely downstream passage of alewives and eels. Studies are needed to understand what facilities or measures may be needed to meet fish passage efficiency goals and ensure passage of juvenile and adult alewife and American eel into and out of lakes and ponds. 18.2.3 Complete Fish Passage Improvements Based on Passage Efficiency Studies Once fish passage efficiency studies are complete, installation of passage facilities, operational changes to existing passage facilities, and/or installation of additional fish passage facilities at lake and pond outlets are to be undertaken 18.2.4. Assess Fish Passage Facility Improvements for Juvenile and Adult Alewife and American Eel at Lake and Pond Outlets A minimum of three field seasons are needed to verify that the improvements allow the fish passage facilities/measures to meet efficiency goals for passage of adult and juvenile alewife and American eel. 19.1.1 Review Need to Establish Upstream and Downstream Fish Passage Facility Operating Protocols to Ensure Proper Operation of Upstream and Downstream Fish Passage Facilities There is a need to monitor the operation of upstream and downstream fish passage facilities to ensure proper operation of the facilities during the migration season of the target restoration species. In some instances, particularly at hydro projects which have FERC license exemptions, operating protocols may not be included in articles within the FERC license or license exemption. There is a need to establish fish migration windows for the target restoration species so that all fish passage facilities are operated during the same time frames. 19.1.2 Periodically Inspect Upstream and Downstream Fish Passage Facilities to Ensure Facilities are Effective in Passing Target Restoration Species Weekly inspections of fish passage facilities need to be undertaken to ensure proper and timely operation of the facilities. 19.1.3 Consult with Owners of Fish Passage Facilities Regarding Fish Passage Issues Periodic maintenance at dams, ill-timed water releases, poor maintenance of fish passages facilities, etc. can result in poor fish passage. Consultation with dam owners prior to circumstances that cause less effective fish passage is necessary to prevent situations where access to spawning and rearing habitat is compromised. PRFP Page 76
19.1.4 Consult and/or Partner with Owners of Fish Passage Facilities to Improve Effectiveness of Fish Passage Facilities and/or Fish Passage Measures Fish passage facilities may be constructed as “state-of-the-art” yet may fall short of meeting fish passage efficiency goals. Similarly, measures may be instituted but could be ill-timed to benefit target restoration species. Consultation and/or forming partnerships with owners of fish passage facilities to improve the effectiveness of facilities and/or measures may be needed to meet fish passage targets. 19.1.5 Consult and/or Partner with Dam Owners to Install Fish Passage Facilities at Problematic Passage Sites Dam owners may have constructed fish passage facilities that comply with fish passage articles within FERC license or license exemptions. However, some facilities may perform poorly. In other situations, fish passage facilities have yet to be installed. Depending on the dam (hydro, non-hydro), state or federal regulatory agencies may have authority to prescribe or request that fish passage facilities be installed and operated. USFWS and NOAA have prescriptive authority under Section 18 of the Federal Power Act to prescribe installation and operation of fish passage facilities at FERC jurisdictional dams. DMR and IFW have statutory authority to request installation of fish passage facilities at FERC non-jurisdictional dams. Consultation and/or forming partnerships with dam owners may be necessary to ensure passage of target restoration species at problematic sites. 19.1.6 Develop Fish Handling and Trap Operating Protocols for the Milford Dam Fish Lift A new fish lift will be constructed at the Milford Dam in the next two or three years as part of the Penobscot River Restoration Project. MDDMR will be the primary agency involved with the operation of the lift. Atlantic salmon brood stock will be collected at this facility and clupeids will be sorted for release into the Milford headpond and/or transported to targeted river reaches or lakes and ponds. There is a need to develop protocols for fish handling, sorting, and operating the trap. 20.1.1 Monitor Stream Connectivity to Ensure Effective Upstream and Downstream Fish Passage and Instream Movements Stream connectivity is crucial for target restoration species to access spawning and rearing habitat and to access the ocean. Stream connectivity is also critical for stream dwelling juvenile life stages to access food and refuge. Establishing a system for monitoring stream connectivity will ensure unimpeded access to various habitats within the Penobscot River watershed. 20.1.2 Ensure Implementation of the Maine Department of Transportation’s Waterway and Wildlife Crossing Policy and Design Guide Numerous state and federal regulatory and resource agencies collaborated with MDOT in developing the policy and design guide. While the document guides development of effective ways to build, repair, and maintain the transportation PRFP Page 77
Page 1 and 2:
Operational Plan for the Restoratio
Page 3 and 4:
Table of Contents Introduction ....
Page 5 and 6:
Introduction The overarching goal o
Page 7 and 8:
Section 1 - Alewife, American eel,
Page 9 and 10:
Introduction Five species (shortnos
Page 11 and 12:
3.0 Objective: Rebuild the rainbow
Page 13 and 14:
Table 1. List of lakes above Veazie
Page 15 and 16:
Figure 1. Alewife Phase 1 habitat (
Page 17 and 18:
Table 2. River habitat that histori
Page 19 and 20:
Work Plan Table The budget includes
Page 21 and 22:
3.1.3, 3.2.1, and 3.3.1 Estimate th
Page 23 and 24:
USFWS (Seavey). Analysis may includ
Page 25 and 26:
A boat electrofishing survey (Yoder
Page 27 and 28:
Table 5. Results of natural recolon
Page 29 and 30: Because adult shad mortality increa
Page 31 and 32: 11.0 Rebuild the striped bass popul
Page 33 and 34: meta-population. Based on watershed
Page 35 and 36: Objective 12: Increase wild/natural
Page 37 and 38: Work Plan Table The budget includes
Page 39 and 40: 14.1.2 14.1.3 14.2.1 14.2.2 14.2.3
Page 41 and 42: 12.1.4 Operate the adult Atlantic s
Page 43 and 44: 12.6.1 Proposal to investigate natu
Page 45 and 46: the ability to target specific area
Page 47 and 48: occur. Assessment is likely to incl
Page 49 and 50: smolts needs to be documented (Task
Page 51 and 52: Section 2 - Passage and Connectivit
Page 53 and 54: Atlantic salmon. Two dams on the St
Page 55 and 56: On the tributaries, the downstream
Page 57 and 58: can prevent the successful downstre
Page 59 and 60: ensure maximum emigration of target
Page 61 and 62: 18.1.2 Strategy: Develop/conduct as
Page 63 and 64: 21.1.1 Strategy: Develop a Memorand
Page 65 and 66: 17.1.6 17.2.1 17.2.2 17.2.3 17.2.4
Page 67 and 68: 17.6.5 17.6.6 17.6.7 18.1.1 18.1.2
Page 69 and 70: 20.1.6 20.1.7 20.1.8 20.1.9 20.2.1
Page 71 and 72: Over the past 20 years, there have
Page 73 and 74: that address fish passage. Similarl
Page 75 and 76: 17.2.4 Assess Fish Passage Improvem
Page 77 and 78: 17.5.1 Review the FERC License and
Page 79: 18.1.1 Review Need and Process to I
Page 83 and 84: goals, DMR will need to work with l
Page 85 and 86: 21.1.5 Develop Memorandum of Unders
Page 87 and 88: Section 3 - Habitat PRFP Page 83
Page 89 and 90: Hydrology Riparian and organic inpu
Page 91 and 92: 22.8 Strategy: Undertake an IFIM to
Page 93 and 94: Work Plan Narratives 22.1 Expand US
Page 95 and 96: Recent surveys in coastal Maine riv
Page 97 and 98: Section 4 - Non-Native species incl
Page 99 and 100: 23.1.1.1.1.2 East Branch Pond, whic
Page 101 and 102: Investigate and maintain current bl
Page 103 and 104: The dam at Schoodic Lake has a 6’
Page 105 and 106: Work with IFW regional biologists t
Page 107 and 108: Authors: Joan Trial and Melissa Las
Page 109 and 110: Objective 28: Support regional and
Page 111 and 112: Coordinate data collection and shar
Page 113 and 114: Work Plan Narratives 26.1. Convene
Page 115 and 116: 27.5 Hold an interagency technical
Page 117 and 118: River Restoration Trust (PRRT or Tr
Page 119 and 120: Appendices Appendix A - Role of Hat
Page 121 and 122: Population Structure The ‘concept
Page 123 and 124: supplementation have been highly su
Page 125 and 126: 3. Blueback Herring Meristic/Morpho
Page 127 and 128: populations, Waldman et al. (1996)
Page 129 and 130: Summary No specific information is
Page 131 and 132:
References Anderson, M.G., Vickery,
Page 133 and 134:
Cumberland Basin, New Brunswick. Ph
Page 135 and 136:
Table 1. Sub-drainage and reaches i
Page 137 and 138:
itself verses mortality that may oc
Page 139 and 140:
We estimated cumulative dam mortali
Page 141 and 142:
Female Returns 16000 14000 12000 10
Page 143 and 144:
that must be passed. Furthermore, h
Page 145 and 146:
Appendix C - Penobscot Habitat and
Page 147 and 148:
Parr density (no. / 100 m 2 ) 45 40
Page 149 and 150:
Enfield Weldon to West Enfield Matt
Page 151 and 152:
Habitat (units) Parr Production Hab
Page 153 and 154:
Figure 8. Optimal parr production s
Page 155 and 156:
Subwatershed Dam Reach Management R
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
Page 161 and 162:
Page 163 and 164:
Page 165 and 166:
Page 167 and 168:
lakes fisheries: a general review a
Page 169 and 170:
ecommended adjustments. While other
Page 171 and 172:
Major flexibility constraints of th
Page 173 and 174:
Table 6. Continued. YOY Parr Result
Page 175 and 176:
Appendix E - Atlantic Salmon Fisher
Page 177 and 178:
easonably be accessed; and 4) minim
Page 179 and 180:
Approximately 600,000 smolts are st
Page 181 and 182:
operations. Adult fish reared speci
Page 183 and 184:
Methods We chose to divide the Peno
Page 185 and 186:
• Measure 1b: Sub-drainages with
Page 187 and 188:
Objective 3: Discontinue supplement
Page 189 and 190:
� Strategy- Assess environmental
Page 191 and 192:
Appendix G - Habitat Survey and Ass
Page 193 and 194:
elated to diadromous fishes upstrea
Page 195 and 196:
designs (GRTS), where samples are r
Page 197 and 198:
with panels starting in year 1, 2,
Page 199 and 200:
incorporate further refinements unt
Page 201 and 202:
in statistical analyses stratum Str
Page 203 and 204:
Appendix I - Downstream Passage Stu
Page 205 and 206:
MILFORD (FERC No. 2534) Project Des
Page 207 and 208:
Bangor-Pacific Hydro Associates. 19
Page 209 and 210:
Shepard, S.L. and S.D. Hall. 1991.
Page 211 and 212:
Options under the Multiparty Settle
Page 213 and 214:
As a result of the discussion at th
Page 215 and 216:
By 2000, PPL (new owner of the dams
Page 217 and 218:
arriers to prevent movement of pike
Page 219 and 220:
Kennebec 2008 WhittierPond Vienna N
Page 221 and 222:
are a coldwater species and need ac
Page 223 and 224:
Figure 4. Total species composition
Page 225 and 226:
northern pike (Lucas 2008, Scott an
Page 227 and 228:
Above1 Run 16.3 551 7 FLF, YLP, WHS
Page 229 and 230:
any given water. During warmer peri
Page 231 and 232:
In Maine, lake trout feed primarily
Page 233 and 234:
Piscataquis drainage will likely of
Page 235 and 236:
approximately 14°C”. These tempe
Page 237 and 238:
cover, and aquatic macrophytes are
Page 239 and 240:
and 2) the availability of data in
Page 241 and 242:
Table 5 Northern Pike Waterway Habi
Page 243 and 244:
4. The 40 largest watebodies in the
Page 245 and 246:
5. About 97 percent of the rivers a
Page 247 and 248:
Human-Caused Introductions Backgrou
Page 249 and 250:
Table 7 Maine Lake Northern Pike Di
Page 251 and 252:
Pattern of Introduction and Dispers
Page 253 and 254:
4) The model developed by Solow and
Page 255 and 256:
Inventory of Risk Rating for Waterb
Page 257 and 258:
(Buck's Falls and Cowyard Falls), m
Page 259 and 260:
Prescott Pond Little Wilson Stream
Page 261 and 262:
Summary of Ecological Risk Introduc
Page 263 and 264:
No improvements were made over the
Page 265 and 266:
Level 3 Management actions These ar
Page 267 and 268:
d. Conduct habitat surveys of the P
Page 269 and 270:
Gallagher, M., R. Dill and G. Krame
Page 271 and 272:
Starfield, A. M. and A. L. Bleloch.
Page 273 and 274:
Appendix A: Trapping/Sorting/Counti
Page 275 and 276:
means to “provide safe, timely an
Page 277 and 278:
comprise the majority of fish passi
Page 279 and 280:
exclusion. Information from publish
Page 281 and 282:
A series TSCF system would route al
Page 283 and 284:
(i.e., total exclusion of the targe
Page 285 and 286:
PRFP Page 281
Page 287 and 288:
PRFP Page 283
Page 289 and 290:
Appendix B Outline for Preliminary
Page 291 and 292:
channel would carry almost 1000 cfs
Page 293 and 294:
powerhouse), rock weir/chevron/rest
Page 295 and 296:
PRFP Page 291
Page 297 and 298:
PRFP Page 294
Page 299 and 300:
PRFP Page 296
Page 301 and 302:
populations. Although each member s
Page 303 and 304:
Appendix K - Northern Pike Movement
Page 305 and 306:
MAINE DEPARTMENT OF MARINE RESOURCE
Page 307 and 308:
Table of Contents (Cont’d) LIST O
Page 309 and 310:
2.0 DESCRIPTION OF THE STUDY AREA 2
Page 311 and 312:
3.0 METHODS Both streams were surve
Page 313 and 314:
4.0 RESULTS 4.1 East Branch Lake 4.
Page 315 and 316:
elevation) difference from the crib
Page 317 and 318:
Figure 4: Water and Channel Elevati
Page 319 and 320:
A portion of the stream passes to t
Page 321 and 322:
4.1.3 Wangan and Sanborn brooks are
Page 323 and 324:
Photo 6: View Looking Northwesterly
Page 325 and 326:
location that would prevent fish fr
Page 327 and 328:
APPENDIX 1 SURVEY OF NATURAL BARRIE
Page 329 and 330:
Figure A-1: Orientation of Study Si
Page 331 and 332:
Photo A-3: View from within Sanborn
Page 333 and 334:
Response to Comments and Suggested
Page 335 and 336:
Response: Early mortality syndrome
Page 337 and 338:
population can provide 97,500 alewi
Page 339 and 340:
DMR proposes to expand the Waldobor
Page 341 and 342:
Salmon Comment: There are advocates
Page 343 and 344:
Table 4. Species disposition Specie
Page 345 and 346:
Kingsbury Pond X Long Pond X Long P
Page 347 and 348:
Halfmoon Pond X Hammond Pond X X X
Page 349 and 350:
West Garland Pond X West Lake X X X
Page 351 and 352:
spread of any invasive species, and
Page 353 and 354:
Response: There are conditions when
Page 355 and 356:
Comment: Plan often uses the terms
show all

Operational Plan for the Restoration of Diadromous Fishes to the ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?