08.12.2012 Views

Operational Plan for the Restoration of Diadromous Fishes to the ...

Operational Plan for the Restoration of Diadromous Fishes to the ...

Operational Plan for the Restoration of Diadromous Fishes to the ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

comprise <strong>the</strong> majority <strong>of</strong> fish passing upstream through <strong>the</strong> Proposed Bypass following<br />

implementation <strong>of</strong> res<strong>to</strong>ration projects in <strong>the</strong> Penobscot River watershed, and operation <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> TSCF would <strong>the</strong>re<strong>for</strong>e require handling <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se fish.<br />

Fish entering <strong>the</strong> trap system would be manually sorted with dip nets or similar equipment.<br />

Manual operations would require skilled staff on a daily basis while target res<strong>to</strong>ration<br />

species are active. As presented herein, <strong>the</strong> TSCF can be used <strong>for</strong> both single and twostage<br />

manual sorting <strong>of</strong> trapped fish. It is envisioned that two-stage sorting would be used<br />

initially <strong>to</strong> provide <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> evaluation <strong>of</strong> sorting efficacy at excluding target exclusion species.<br />

Configuration <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> sorting area <strong>for</strong> single or two-stage sorting would be accomplished<br />

through opening and closing gates between <strong>the</strong> sorting area immediately adjacent <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

trap and <strong>the</strong> hydraulic inlet <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> TSCF in <strong>the</strong> Howland Dam impoundment on <strong>the</strong><br />

Piscataquis River. Trash racks or o<strong>the</strong>r means <strong>of</strong> excluding debris from <strong>the</strong> TSCF and/or<br />

Proposed Bypass may be necessary.<br />

3.2 Facility Details<br />

This section presents more-detailed in<strong>for</strong>mation on <strong>the</strong> TSCF, including design alternatives<br />

and facility operations.<br />

3.2.1 Location<br />

Site-specific fac<strong>to</strong>rs and functional considerations suggest that a facility located <strong>to</strong>wards <strong>the</strong><br />

upstream end <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Proposed Bypass would be most appropriate. This determination is<br />

based on biological fac<strong>to</strong>rs, <strong>the</strong> generally steep banks downstream from Howland Dam,<br />

potential flooding <strong>of</strong> a facility situated adjacent <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> confluence <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Piscataquis and<br />

Penobscot Rivers, and constructability.<br />

Location <strong>of</strong> a TSCF along <strong>the</strong> upper reach <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Proposed Bypass has a number <strong>of</strong><br />

apparent practical advantages over a system located along <strong>the</strong> downstream reach <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

bypass channel.<br />

Installation <strong>of</strong> a TSCF on <strong>the</strong> upper reach <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Proposed Bypass would likely result in<br />

fewer fish dropping back through <strong>the</strong> Proposed Bypass, particularly if flow speeds are lower<br />

in <strong>the</strong> Proposed Bypass upstream from <strong>the</strong> TSCF. Locating <strong>the</strong> TSCF at <strong>the</strong> upstream end<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Proposed Bypass along <strong>the</strong> Howland Dam impoundment would apparently minimize<br />

<strong>the</strong> potential <strong>for</strong> fish dropping-back through <strong>the</strong> TSCF. Appropriate conditions <strong>for</strong> upstream<br />

fish passage upstream from <strong>the</strong> TSCF are also necessary <strong>to</strong> reduce impingement <strong>of</strong> fish on<br />

<strong>the</strong> TSCF appurtenances (e.g., bar racks). Locating <strong>the</strong> TSCF along <strong>the</strong> upper reach <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Proposed Bypass may also limit <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> fish entering <strong>the</strong> system, as weak and/or<br />

injured fish and fish that lack a strong urge <strong>to</strong> move upstream through <strong>the</strong> system may not<br />

move far enough up <strong>the</strong> bypass channel <strong>to</strong> reach <strong>the</strong> TSCF.<br />

The high steep banks downstream from <strong>the</strong> Howland Dam pose a number <strong>of</strong> practical<br />

issues relevant <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> TSCF, including potential flooding, constructability, access, and<br />

operations and maintenance. Potential flooding constraints can be determined using typical<br />

engineering methods, and would need <strong>to</strong> consider maximum water surface elevations in <strong>the</strong><br />

Penobscot River and potential overwashing <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> adjacent land during flood events in <strong>the</strong><br />

Piscataquis River. Permanent access <strong>for</strong> heavy equipment <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> TSCF would likely be<br />

required, including tank trucks <strong>for</strong> “trap and truck” s<strong>to</strong>cking. A TSCF located on <strong>the</strong> upper<br />

reach <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Proposed Bypass would likely have easier access <strong>for</strong> such equipment.<br />

PRFP Page 273

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!