Table 6. Results <strong>of</strong> model showing adult returns from A) s<strong>to</strong>cking 6 million fry annually and B) s<strong>to</strong>cking 12 million fry annually. A. Fry s<strong>to</strong>cking years Return Total annual Y1-5 Y6-10 Y11-15 Y16-20 Y21-25 Y26-30 Y31-35 Y36-40 Y41-45 Y46-51 years adult returns 6,000,000 6,000,000 6,000,000 6,000,000 6,000,000 6,000,000 6,000,000 6,000,000 6,000,000 6,000,000 Y6-10 18,868 18,868 Y11-15 40,807 21,939 18,868 Y16-20 66,318 25,511 21,939 18,868 Y21-25 95,982 29,664 25,511 21,939 18,868 Y26-30 130,475 34,493 29,664 25,511 21,939 18,868 Y31-35 170,583 40,108 34,493 29,664 25,511 21,939 18,868 Y36-40 217,221 46,637 40,108 34,493 29,664 25,511 21,939 18,868 Y41-45 271,450 54,229 46,637 40,108 34,493 29,664 25,511 21,939 18,868 Y46-50 334,508 63,057 54,229 46,637 40,108 34,493 29,664 25,511 21,939 18,868 Y51-55 407,830 73,323 63,057 54,229 46,637 40,108 34,493 29,664 25,511 21,939 18,868 Y56-60 474,221 85,259 73,323 63,057 54,229 46,637 40,108 34,493 29,664 25,511 21,939 Y61-65 551,420 99,138 85,259 73,323 63,057 54,229 46,637 40,108 34,493 29,664 25,511 Y66 641,186 115,277 99,138 85,259 73,323 63,057 54,229 46,637 40,108 34,493 29,664 B. Fry s<strong>to</strong>cking years Return Total annual Y1-5 Y6-10 Y11-15 Y16-20 Y21-25 Y26-30 Y31-35 Y36-40 Y41-45 Y46-51 years adult returns 12,000,000 12,000,000 12,000,000 12,000,000 12,000,000 12,000,000 12,000,000 12,000,000 12,000,000 Y6-10 37,736 37,736 Y11-15 81,615 43,879 37,736 Y16-20 132,637 51,022 43,879 37,736 Y21-25 191,965 59,328 51,022 43,879 37,736 Y26-30 260,950 68,986 59,328 51,022 43,879 37,736 Y31-35 341,167 80,216 68,986 59,328 51,022 43,879 37,736 Y36-40 434,441 93,275 80,216 68,986 59,328 51,022 43,879 37,736 Y41-45 542,900 108,459 93,275 80,216 68,986 59,328 51,022 43,879 37,736 Y46-50 669,015 126,115 108,459 93,275 80,216 68,986 59,328 51,022 43,879 37,736 We are proposing <strong>to</strong> s<strong>to</strong>ck shad in<strong>to</strong> habitat above Mil<strong>for</strong>d, West Enfield, and Howland as soon as possible <strong>to</strong> allow testing <strong>of</strong> upstream and downstream passage efficiency at Mil<strong>for</strong>d, West Enfield, and Howland, and Lowell Tannery within five years <strong>of</strong> s<strong>to</strong>cking. American shad are proving <strong>to</strong> be one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> most difficult anadromous species <strong>to</strong> successful pass at technical fishways, and an early determination <strong>of</strong> passage efficiency at Mil<strong>for</strong>d and Howland is critical <strong>to</strong> shad res<strong>to</strong>ration on this river. If adult shad use <strong>the</strong> state-<strong>of</strong>-<strong>the</strong>-art fishlift that will constructed at Mil<strong>for</strong>d, <strong>the</strong>y can be serve as broods<strong>to</strong>ck <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> hatchery and/or can be passed upstream <strong>to</strong> spawn naturally. 7.1.1 Identify potential sources <strong>of</strong> American shad broods<strong>to</strong>ck (500-600 adults <strong>to</strong> produce 6M fry or 1000-1200 adults <strong>for</strong> 12M fry). The privately owned Waldoboro Shad Hatchery, which has provided fry <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> Kennebec River <strong>Res<strong>to</strong>ration</strong> Project, was modeled after <strong>the</strong> Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission Hatchery that has successfully supplied shad <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> Susquehanna River res<strong>to</strong>ration. The Waldoboro Hatchery currently requires 500- 600 adult shad broods<strong>to</strong>ck <strong>to</strong> produce up <strong>to</strong> 6 million fry. At <strong>the</strong> start <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> season, DMR trucks several hundred adult broods<strong>to</strong>ck <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> hatchery. The fish are allowed <strong>to</strong> spawn naturally in large indoor circular tanks; no hormones are used in this process. DMR trucks additional fish <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> hatchery, which are added <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> spawning tanks <strong>to</strong> compensate <strong>for</strong> spawning mortality or <strong>to</strong> replace spent fish. Fertilized eggs are collected, allowed <strong>to</strong> hatch, and transferred <strong>to</strong> fry tanks. Fry are fed, marked with OTC, and released in<strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> river when <strong>the</strong>y are approximately 21days old. PRFP Page 24
Because adult shad mortality increases with increasing temperature and distance that fish must be trucked, only sources <strong>of</strong> broods<strong>to</strong>ck within a 5-6 hour drive were considered. Potential sources <strong>of</strong> sufficient broods<strong>to</strong>ck in <strong>the</strong> Gulf <strong>of</strong> Maine are limited (Table 7). A remnant population exists in <strong>the</strong> lower Penobscot, but DMR estimates this population <strong>to</strong> be 1000 fish at most. In addition, capturing <strong>the</strong>se fish <strong>for</strong> broods<strong>to</strong>ck be<strong>for</strong>e <strong>the</strong> removal <strong>of</strong> Veazie and Great Works dams would be nearly impossible. Runs in <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r Maine rivers are ei<strong>the</strong>r <strong>to</strong>o small, are undergoing res<strong>to</strong>ration, or cannot be easily captured. The nearest source 13 <strong>of</strong> 1000-1200 adults within <strong>the</strong> Gulf <strong>of</strong> Maine is <strong>the</strong> Merrimack River (Table 7). This quantity <strong>of</strong> broods<strong>to</strong>ck is also available from <strong>the</strong> Connecticut River, located outside <strong>the</strong> Gulf <strong>of</strong> Maine. During <strong>the</strong> development <strong>of</strong> this operational plan, we reviewed <strong>the</strong> best available in<strong>for</strong>mation regarding <strong>the</strong> genetic structuring <strong>of</strong> shad populations on <strong>the</strong> east coast in order <strong>to</strong> assess <strong>the</strong> potential impacts <strong>of</strong> using out-<strong>of</strong>-basin shad broods<strong>to</strong>ck <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> Penobscot River res<strong>to</strong>ration. This analysis is presented in Appendix A. Table 7. Nearest potential sources <strong>of</strong> American shad broods<strong>to</strong>ck. River system Distance Status <strong>of</strong> run Penobscot 0 mi Size unknown, not easily captured Kennebec/Androscoggin 58 mi Size unknown, ongoing res<strong>to</strong>ration, not easily captured Narraguagus 72 mi 100 adults in 2008 Saco 93 mi ~1200 adults, ongoing res<strong>to</strong>ration, capture at fishlift Merrimack 125 mi ~29,000 in 2008, ongoing res<strong>to</strong>ration, capture at fishlift St. John 179 mi Less than 1000 in 28 <strong>of</strong> 29 years from 1974- 2002 7.1.2. Double capacity <strong>of</strong> Waldoboro American shad hatchery. The Waldoboro Shad Hatchery currently can produce up <strong>to</strong> 6 million fry per year. It would have <strong>to</strong> be expanded <strong>to</strong> produce 12 million fry per year, which could be accomplished in less than one year if funding becomes available. 7.1.3 Develop an assessment plan <strong>for</strong> evaluating <strong>the</strong> effectiveness <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> American shad hatchery s<strong>to</strong>cking program (per ASMFC pro<strong>to</strong>cols). Amendment 1 <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> Interstate Fishery Management <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>for</strong> Shad and River Herring requires that states with a hatchery program must submit proposals <strong>for</strong> evaluation and provide in<strong>for</strong>mation in <strong>the</strong> annual report <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> hatchery contribution (percent wild versus hatchery fish <strong>for</strong> juveniles and adults). Most programs mark hatchery fry with OTC, which shows as a fluorescent ring on <strong>the</strong> o<strong>to</strong>lith. Samples <strong>of</strong> emigrating juveniles and returning adults are sacrificed and <strong>the</strong>ir o<strong>to</strong>liths are 13 Distance measured from river mouth <strong>to</strong> river mouth. PRFP Page 25
- Page 1 and 2: Operational Plan for the Restoratio
- Page 3 and 4: Table of Contents Introduction ....
- Page 5 and 6: Introduction The overarching goal o
- Page 7 and 8: Section 1 - Alewife, American eel,
- Page 9 and 10: Introduction Five species (shortnos
- Page 11 and 12: 3.0 Objective: Rebuild the rainbow
- Page 13 and 14: Table 1. List of lakes above Veazie
- Page 15 and 16: Figure 1. Alewife Phase 1 habitat (
- Page 17 and 18: Table 2. River habitat that histori
- Page 19 and 20: Work Plan Table The budget includes
- Page 21 and 22: 3.1.3, 3.2.1, and 3.3.1 Estimate th
- Page 23 and 24: USFWS (Seavey). Analysis may includ
- Page 25 and 26: A boat electrofishing survey (Yoder
- Page 27: Table 5. Results of natural recolon
- Page 31 and 32: 11.0 Rebuild the striped bass popul
- Page 33 and 34: meta-population. Based on watershed
- Page 35 and 36: Objective 12: Increase wild/natural
- Page 37 and 38: Work Plan Table The budget includes
- Page 39 and 40: 14.1.2 14.1.3 14.2.1 14.2.2 14.2.3
- Page 41 and 42: 12.1.4 Operate the adult Atlantic s
- Page 43 and 44: 12.6.1 Proposal to investigate natu
- Page 45 and 46: the ability to target specific area
- Page 47 and 48: occur. Assessment is likely to incl
- Page 49 and 50: smolts needs to be documented (Task
- Page 51 and 52: Section 2 - Passage and Connectivit
- Page 53 and 54: Atlantic salmon. Two dams on the St
- Page 55 and 56: On the tributaries, the downstream
- Page 57 and 58: can prevent the successful downstre
- Page 59 and 60: ensure maximum emigration of target
- Page 61 and 62: 18.1.2 Strategy: Develop/conduct as
- Page 63 and 64: 21.1.1 Strategy: Develop a Memorand
- Page 65 and 66: 17.1.6 17.2.1 17.2.2 17.2.3 17.2.4
- Page 67 and 68: 17.6.5 17.6.6 17.6.7 18.1.1 18.1.2
- Page 69 and 70: 20.1.6 20.1.7 20.1.8 20.1.9 20.2.1
- Page 71 and 72: Over the past 20 years, there have
- Page 73 and 74: that address fish passage. Similarl
- Page 75 and 76: 17.2.4 Assess Fish Passage Improvem
- Page 77 and 78: 17.5.1 Review the FERC License and
- Page 79 and 80:
18.1.1 Review Need and Process to I
- Page 81 and 82:
19.1.4 Consult and/or Partner with
- Page 83 and 84:
goals, DMR will need to work with l
- Page 85 and 86:
21.1.5 Develop Memorandum of Unders
- Page 87 and 88:
Section 3 - Habitat PRFP Page 83
- Page 89 and 90:
Hydrology Riparian and organic inpu
- Page 91 and 92:
22.8 Strategy: Undertake an IFIM to
- Page 93 and 94:
Work Plan Narratives 22.1 Expand US
- Page 95 and 96:
Recent surveys in coastal Maine riv
- Page 97 and 98:
Section 4 - Non-Native species incl
- Page 99 and 100:
23.1.1.1.1.2 East Branch Pond, whic
- Page 101 and 102:
Investigate and maintain current bl
- Page 103 and 104:
The dam at Schoodic Lake has a 6’
- Page 105 and 106:
Work with IFW regional biologists t
- Page 107 and 108:
Authors: Joan Trial and Melissa Las
- Page 109 and 110:
Objective 28: Support regional and
- Page 111 and 112:
Coordinate data collection and shar
- Page 113 and 114:
Work Plan Narratives 26.1. Convene
- Page 115 and 116:
27.5 Hold an interagency technical
- Page 117 and 118:
River Restoration Trust (PRRT or Tr
- Page 119 and 120:
Appendices Appendix A - Role of Hat
- Page 121 and 122:
Population Structure The ‘concept
- Page 123 and 124:
supplementation have been highly su
- Page 125 and 126:
3. Blueback Herring Meristic/Morpho
- Page 127 and 128:
populations, Waldman et al. (1996)
- Page 129 and 130:
Summary No specific information is
- Page 131 and 132:
References Anderson, M.G., Vickery,
- Page 133 and 134:
Cumberland Basin, New Brunswick. Ph
- Page 135 and 136:
Table 1. Sub-drainage and reaches i
- Page 137 and 138:
itself verses mortality that may oc
- Page 139 and 140:
We estimated cumulative dam mortali
- Page 141 and 142:
Female Returns 16000 14000 12000 10
- Page 143 and 144:
that must be passed. Furthermore, h
- Page 145 and 146:
Appendix C - Penobscot Habitat and
- Page 147 and 148:
Parr density (no. / 100 m 2 ) 45 40
- Page 149 and 150:
Enfield Weldon to West Enfield Matt
- Page 151 and 152:
Habitat (units) Parr Production Hab
- Page 153 and 154:
Figure 8. Optimal parr production s
- Page 155 and 156:
Subwatershed Dam Reach Management R
- Page 157 and 158:
Subwatershed Dam Reach Management R
- Page 159 and 160:
Subwatershed Dam Reach Management R
- Page 161 and 162:
Subwatershed Dam Reach Management R
- Page 163 and 164:
Subwatershed Dam Reach Management R
- Page 165 and 166:
Subwatershed Dam Reach Management R
- Page 167 and 168:
lakes fisheries: a general review a
- Page 169 and 170:
ecommended adjustments. While other
- Page 171 and 172:
Major flexibility constraints of th
- Page 173 and 174:
Table 6. Continued. YOY Parr Result
- Page 175 and 176:
Appendix E - Atlantic Salmon Fisher
- Page 177 and 178:
easonably be accessed; and 4) minim
- Page 179 and 180:
Approximately 600,000 smolts are st
- Page 181 and 182:
operations. Adult fish reared speci
- Page 183 and 184:
Methods We chose to divide the Peno
- Page 185 and 186:
• Measure 1b: Sub-drainages with
- Page 187 and 188:
Objective 3: Discontinue supplement
- Page 189 and 190:
� Strategy- Assess environmental
- Page 191 and 192:
Appendix G - Habitat Survey and Ass
- Page 193 and 194:
elated to diadromous fishes upstrea
- Page 195 and 196:
designs (GRTS), where samples are r
- Page 197 and 198:
with panels starting in year 1, 2,
- Page 199 and 200:
incorporate further refinements unt
- Page 201 and 202:
in statistical analyses stratum Str
- Page 203 and 204:
Appendix I - Downstream Passage Stu
- Page 205 and 206:
MILFORD (FERC No. 2534) Project Des
- Page 207 and 208:
Bangor-Pacific Hydro Associates. 19
- Page 209 and 210:
Shepard, S.L. and S.D. Hall. 1991.
- Page 211 and 212:
Options under the Multiparty Settle
- Page 213 and 214:
As a result of the discussion at th
- Page 215 and 216:
By 2000, PPL (new owner of the dams
- Page 217 and 218:
arriers to prevent movement of pike
- Page 219 and 220:
Kennebec 2008 WhittierPond Vienna N
- Page 221 and 222:
are a coldwater species and need ac
- Page 223 and 224:
Figure 4. Total species composition
- Page 225 and 226:
northern pike (Lucas 2008, Scott an
- Page 227 and 228:
Above1 Run 16.3 551 7 FLF, YLP, WHS
- Page 229 and 230:
any given water. During warmer peri
- Page 231 and 232:
In Maine, lake trout feed primarily
- Page 233 and 234:
Piscataquis drainage will likely of
- Page 235 and 236:
approximately 14°C”. These tempe
- Page 237 and 238:
cover, and aquatic macrophytes are
- Page 239 and 240:
and 2) the availability of data in
- Page 241 and 242:
Table 5 Northern Pike Waterway Habi
- Page 243 and 244:
4. The 40 largest watebodies in the
- Page 245 and 246:
5. About 97 percent of the rivers a
- Page 247 and 248:
Human-Caused Introductions Backgrou
- Page 249 and 250:
Table 7 Maine Lake Northern Pike Di
- Page 251 and 252:
Pattern of Introduction and Dispers
- Page 253 and 254:
4) The model developed by Solow and
- Page 255 and 256:
Inventory of Risk Rating for Waterb
- Page 257 and 258:
(Buck's Falls and Cowyard Falls), m
- Page 259 and 260:
Prescott Pond Little Wilson Stream
- Page 261 and 262:
Summary of Ecological Risk Introduc
- Page 263 and 264:
No improvements were made over the
- Page 265 and 266:
Level 3 Management actions These ar
- Page 267 and 268:
d. Conduct habitat surveys of the P
- Page 269 and 270:
Gallagher, M., R. Dill and G. Krame
- Page 271 and 272:
Starfield, A. M. and A. L. Bleloch.
- Page 273 and 274:
Appendix A: Trapping/Sorting/Counti
- Page 275 and 276:
means to “provide safe, timely an
- Page 277 and 278:
comprise the majority of fish passi
- Page 279 and 280:
exclusion. Information from publish
- Page 281 and 282:
A series TSCF system would route al
- Page 283 and 284:
(i.e., total exclusion of the targe
- Page 285 and 286:
PRFP Page 281
- Page 287 and 288:
PRFP Page 283
- Page 289 and 290:
Appendix B Outline for Preliminary
- Page 291 and 292:
channel would carry almost 1000 cfs
- Page 293 and 294:
powerhouse), rock weir/chevron/rest
- Page 295 and 296:
PRFP Page 291
- Page 297 and 298:
PRFP Page 294
- Page 299 and 300:
PRFP Page 296
- Page 301 and 302:
populations. Although each member s
- Page 303 and 304:
Appendix K - Northern Pike Movement
- Page 305 and 306:
MAINE DEPARTMENT OF MARINE RESOURCE
- Page 307 and 308:
Table of Contents (Cont’d) LIST O
- Page 309 and 310:
2.0 DESCRIPTION OF THE STUDY AREA 2
- Page 311 and 312:
3.0 METHODS Both streams were surve
- Page 313 and 314:
4.0 RESULTS 4.1 East Branch Lake 4.
- Page 315 and 316:
elevation) difference from the crib
- Page 317 and 318:
Figure 4: Water and Channel Elevati
- Page 319 and 320:
A portion of the stream passes to t
- Page 321 and 322:
4.1.3 Wangan and Sanborn brooks are
- Page 323 and 324:
Photo 6: View Looking Northwesterly
- Page 325 and 326:
location that would prevent fish fr
- Page 327 and 328:
APPENDIX 1 SURVEY OF NATURAL BARRIE
- Page 329 and 330:
Figure A-1: Orientation of Study Si
- Page 331 and 332:
Photo A-3: View from within Sanborn
- Page 333 and 334:
Response to Comments and Suggested
- Page 335 and 336:
Response: Early mortality syndrome
- Page 337 and 338:
population can provide 97,500 alewi
- Page 339 and 340:
DMR proposes to expand the Waldobor
- Page 341 and 342:
Salmon Comment: There are advocates
- Page 343 and 344:
Table 4. Species disposition Specie
- Page 345 and 346:
Kingsbury Pond X Long Pond X Long P
- Page 347 and 348:
Halfmoon Pond X Hammond Pond X X X
- Page 349 and 350:
West Garland Pond X West Lake X X X
- Page 351 and 352:
spread of any invasive species, and
- Page 353 and 354:
Response: There are conditions when
- Page 355 and 356:
Comment: Plan often uses the terms