COMMISSION
4FcEkUnlA
4FcEkUnlA
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
While these new steps have the potential to increase the time for project review and<br />
evaluation, it will promote improved communication between tribes and lead agencies.<br />
The bill recognizes that consultation is an important function that already occurs between<br />
tribes and lead agencies; these new requirements do not impede on or replace previous<br />
consultation processes.<br />
The second component requires lead agencies to evaluate a project’s potential to impact<br />
TCRs. TCRs are a broad category as defined in CEQA. TCRs are “a site, feature, place,<br />
cultural landscape, sacred place, or object which is considered of cultural value to a<br />
California Native American Tribe” (PRC § 21074(a) (1-2). TCRs may overlap existing historic<br />
and archaeological sites and be considered cultural landscapes. The consultation process<br />
will identify potential TCRs in a project area. During environmental review, if it is determined<br />
that the project causes substantial adverse change to a TCR, it is a project that may have<br />
a significant effect on the environment (PRC § 21084.2). AB 52 also requires lead agencies<br />
to follow new confidentiality requirements regarding TCRs in the project area. These<br />
requirements make comments and information submitted by tribes confidential and not<br />
available to the public during public review of environmental documents.<br />
Since the passage of AB 52, the OHMVR Division and Districts have:<br />
•§<br />
attended Native American Heritage Commission meetings and hearings that<br />
discussed AB 52 legislation and changes to their roles and functions;<br />
•§<br />
facilitated training opportunities for managers, tribal liaisons, and interested staff;<br />
•§<br />
implemented regular and ongoing meetings with interested tribes to keep them<br />
informed of pending projects, and get their input as early in the planning stages<br />
as possible;<br />
•§<br />
administered contracts with qualified archaeological and cultural resource<br />
management firms for consultation services; and,<br />
•§<br />
conducted outreach for consultation efforts with local tribes to meet State Parks and<br />
OHMVR Division’s mission statements and comply with CEQA.<br />
Native American Consultation Training<br />
In August 2015, the OHMVR Division collaborated with State Parks’ Cultural Resources<br />
Division and the Native American Heritage Commission to provide an in-depth training<br />
for employees on AB 52 requirements. The training was offered to all OHMVR Division<br />
staff and was open to State Park cultural resource managers. More than 30 managers,<br />
supervisors, tribal liaisons, and interested staff participated at the William Penn Mott<br />
Jr. Training Center in Pacific Grove and from remote locations around the state using<br />
video conferencing technology. Two open sessions allowed participants to ask questions<br />
and discuss aspects of the bill not covered in the presentations. In addition, the Cultural<br />
2017 Program Report 79