20.03.2017 Views

COMMISSION

4FcEkUnlA

4FcEkUnlA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

While these new steps have the potential to increase the time for project review and<br />

evaluation, it will promote improved communication between tribes and lead agencies.<br />

The bill recognizes that consultation is an important function that already occurs between<br />

tribes and lead agencies; these new requirements do not impede on or replace previous<br />

consultation processes.<br />

The second component requires lead agencies to evaluate a project’s potential to impact<br />

TCRs. TCRs are a broad category as defined in CEQA. TCRs are “a site, feature, place,<br />

cultural landscape, sacred place, or object which is considered of cultural value to a<br />

California Native American Tribe” (PRC § 21074(a) (1-2). TCRs may overlap existing historic<br />

and archaeological sites and be considered cultural landscapes. The consultation process<br />

will identify potential TCRs in a project area. During environmental review, if it is determined<br />

that the project causes substantial adverse change to a TCR, it is a project that may have<br />

a significant effect on the environment (PRC § 21084.2). AB 52 also requires lead agencies<br />

to follow new confidentiality requirements regarding TCRs in the project area. These<br />

requirements make comments and information submitted by tribes confidential and not<br />

available to the public during public review of environmental documents.<br />

Since the passage of AB 52, the OHMVR Division and Districts have:<br />

•§<br />

attended Native American Heritage Commission meetings and hearings that<br />

discussed AB 52 legislation and changes to their roles and functions;<br />

•§<br />

facilitated training opportunities for managers, tribal liaisons, and interested staff;<br />

•§<br />

implemented regular and ongoing meetings with interested tribes to keep them<br />

informed of pending projects, and get their input as early in the planning stages<br />

as possible;<br />

•§<br />

administered contracts with qualified archaeological and cultural resource<br />

management firms for consultation services; and,<br />

•§<br />

conducted outreach for consultation efforts with local tribes to meet State Parks and<br />

OHMVR Division’s mission statements and comply with CEQA.<br />

Native American Consultation Training<br />

In August 2015, the OHMVR Division collaborated with State Parks’ Cultural Resources<br />

Division and the Native American Heritage Commission to provide an in-depth training<br />

for employees on AB 52 requirements. The training was offered to all OHMVR Division<br />

staff and was open to State Park cultural resource managers. More than 30 managers,<br />

supervisors, tribal liaisons, and interested staff participated at the William Penn Mott<br />

Jr. Training Center in Pacific Grove and from remote locations around the state using<br />

video conferencing technology. Two open sessions allowed participants to ask questions<br />

and discuss aspects of the bill not covered in the presentations. In addition, the Cultural<br />

2017 Program Report 79

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!