25.09.2020 Views

Rethinking Schooling for the 21st Century

UNESCO MGIEP officially launched 'Rethinking Schooling for the 21st Century: The State of Education, Peace and Sustainable Development and Global Citizenship' in 2017 at the UNESCO General Conference. This study analyses how far the ideals of SDG 4.7 are embodied in policies and curricula across 22 Asian countries and establishes benchmarks against which future progress can be assessed. It also argues forcefully that we must redefine the purposes of schooling, addressing the fundamental challenges to efforts to promote peace, sustainability and global citizenship through education.

UNESCO MGIEP officially launched 'Rethinking Schooling for the 21st Century: The State of Education, Peace and Sustainable Development and Global Citizenship' in 2017 at the UNESCO General Conference. This study analyses how far the ideals of SDG 4.7 are embodied in policies and curricula across 22 Asian countries and establishes benchmarks against which future progress can be assessed. It also argues forcefully that we must redefine the purposes of schooling, addressing the fundamental challenges to efforts to promote peace, sustainability and global citizenship through education.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

textbooks, though this policy is almost certain to be abandoned by her successor.<br />

Textbook pluralism thus survives in Korea, but in a highly polarised <strong>for</strong>m ironically<br />

underpinned by broad consensus over <strong>the</strong> ethno-cultural essence of nationhood.<br />

Portrayals of Ethno-cultural Diversity: Minorities and Migrants<br />

As <strong>the</strong> coding results demonstrate, <strong>the</strong> importance of respecting diversity is<br />

acknowledged, to varying degrees, in curricula across East Asia (see Appendix<br />

II-12d). However, references to diversity or tolerance tend to dissolve, on closer<br />

examination, in <strong>the</strong> pervasive solvent of nationalism. Besides documents relating<br />

to Moral Education (or equivalent subjects) and social studies, it is significant<br />

that specific references to diversity appear most frequently in <strong>for</strong>eign language<br />

curricula (see Figure 3.4). Understandings of pluralism and diversity as qualities<br />

that cut across national boundaries, characterising domestic as much as<br />

international society, remain generally weak.<br />

Figure 3.4. References to ‘respect/appreciation <strong>for</strong> diversity’ in primary and<br />

secondary subject curricula in China, Japan and <strong>the</strong> Republic of Korea<br />

16<br />

National Language Foreign Language Maths<br />

Science Social Science<br />

No. of references per 100 pages<br />

12<br />

8<br />

4<br />

0<br />

China<br />

Japan<br />

Korea,<br />

Republic<br />

of<br />

China Japan Korea,<br />

Republic<br />

of<br />

China Japan Korea,<br />

Republic<br />

of<br />

China Japan Korea,<br />

Republic<br />

of<br />

China Japan Korea,<br />

Republic<br />

of<br />

More general policy statements, taken on <strong>the</strong>ir own, give a ra<strong>the</strong>r different<br />

impression in <strong>the</strong> case of China. There, official curricula explicitly highlight <strong>the</strong><br />

diverse ethic character of <strong>the</strong> People’s Republic, mandating extensive provision<br />

<strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> education of ‘minorities’ — alongside persistent emphasis on inter-ethnic<br />

‘unity’ or ‘solidarity’ (minzu tuanjie) (see MOEGO and SEACGO, 2008). The<br />

National Education Outline (gangyao) 2010-2020 enumerates various measures<br />

aimed at ‘advancing’ bilingual teaching; ‘pairing’ schools in minority areas with<br />

those elsewhere, <strong>for</strong> purposes of ‘assistance’; incentivising graduates to teach<br />

in ‘minority-inhabited areas’; and developing ‘modern distance education’. The<br />

13th Five-Year Plan 2016-2020 makes <strong>the</strong> ‘sound development of ethnic areas’<br />

a ‘strategic goal’ of re<strong>for</strong>m (Chapter 40), while emphasising successes already<br />

achieved. The number of years of education received by 14 of <strong>the</strong> 56 officially<br />

recognised ethnic minorities, including Koreans, Manchus, Mongols and Kazakhs,<br />

now exceeds <strong>the</strong> national average (UNHRC, 2013). In Tibet, it is claimed, fifteen<br />

years of free education is available; <strong>the</strong> enrolment rate of school-age children<br />

<strong>for</strong> primary schools has reached 99.64 per cent; youth illiteracy has fallen to 0.57<br />

<strong>Rethinking</strong> <strong>Schooling</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> 21 st <strong>Century</strong>:<br />

The State of Education <strong>for</strong> Peace, Sustainable Development and Global Citizenship in Asia<br />

85

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!