25.09.2020 Views

Rethinking Schooling for the 21st Century

UNESCO MGIEP officially launched 'Rethinking Schooling for the 21st Century: The State of Education, Peace and Sustainable Development and Global Citizenship' in 2017 at the UNESCO General Conference. This study analyses how far the ideals of SDG 4.7 are embodied in policies and curricula across 22 Asian countries and establishes benchmarks against which future progress can be assessed. It also argues forcefully that we must redefine the purposes of schooling, addressing the fundamental challenges to efforts to promote peace, sustainability and global citizenship through education.

UNESCO MGIEP officially launched 'Rethinking Schooling for the 21st Century: The State of Education, Peace and Sustainable Development and Global Citizenship' in 2017 at the UNESCO General Conference. This study analyses how far the ideals of SDG 4.7 are embodied in policies and curricula across 22 Asian countries and establishes benchmarks against which future progress can be assessed. It also argues forcefully that we must redefine the purposes of schooling, addressing the fundamental challenges to efforts to promote peace, sustainability and global citizenship through education.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Table 6.1. Teaching/learning approaches in all coded documents (number of<br />

references)<br />

Student/<br />

Learner<br />

Centred<br />

Respecting<br />

Learner's<br />

diversity<br />

Interdisciplinary<br />

Wholeschool<br />

approach<br />

Use of ICTs/<br />

Social media<br />

Kazakhstan 623 50 72 0 50<br />

Kyrgyzstan 23 2 12 0 8<br />

Mongolia 18 16 4 4 7<br />

Uzbekistan 76 1 12 1 11<br />

TOTAL 740 69 100 5 76<br />

Although a student-centred approach is heavily emphasised in education policy<br />

and curricula, a tradition of teacher-centred pedagogy remains — as does a strong<br />

emphasis on preparation <strong>for</strong> national-level high-stakes examinations such as<br />

<strong>the</strong> National Graduation Test, and Maths Olympiads. A boom in private tutoring<br />

and examination preparation courses across <strong>the</strong> region has been connected<br />

to a number of drivers, including <strong>the</strong> deteriorating quality of education in<br />

mainstream schools, <strong>the</strong> persistent importance of high-stakes examinations, and<br />

<strong>the</strong> increasingly competitive and insecure nature of <strong>the</strong> labour market combined<br />

with <strong>the</strong> collapse of Soviet-era welfare guarantees (Silova, 2009b) (<strong>the</strong> issue of<br />

supplementary private tutoring is taken up in <strong>the</strong> next section).<br />

In Kyrgyzstan, teachers were offered little training <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> task of creating new<br />

materials <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> purpose of school-based curriculum development, as envisaged<br />

in official policy (de la Sablonnière, Taylor and Sadykova, 2009). Central authorities<br />

did not allow schools to choose texts, and those <strong>the</strong>y had were rarely updated.<br />

Research in <strong>the</strong> late 1990s reported that, in <strong>the</strong> absence of substantial training<br />

and new resources, teachers could only ‘follow slavishly’ <strong>the</strong> approach laid down<br />

in such materials, leading to a ‘very passive stance’ (Webber, 2000). Although <strong>the</strong><br />

central authorities introduced new concepts and approaches such as assessing<br />

<strong>the</strong> surrounding environment, critical analysis, collective decision-making and<br />

<strong>the</strong> use of phrases such as ‘learner autonomy’ and ‘critical thinking’, <strong>the</strong>y did<br />

not provide any specific guidance or new resources to assist in operationalising<br />

<strong>the</strong>se ideas. In <strong>the</strong> Central Asian societies,<br />

teachers had little exposure to <strong>the</strong> discourse of<br />

alternative ways of conceptualising education<br />

(de la Sablonnière, Taylor and Sadykova, 2009).<br />

As Amsler (2009) observed in Kyrgyzstan,<br />

<strong>the</strong> hope that education promises a brighter<br />

future <strong>for</strong> both <strong>the</strong> individual and society often<br />

coexists awkwardly with teachers’ extremely low<br />

salaries and declining professional legitimacy.<br />

The social status of teachers has weakened in<br />

The hope that education<br />

promises a brighter<br />

future <strong>for</strong> both<br />

<strong>the</strong> individual and<br />

society often coexists<br />

awkwardly with<br />

teachers’ extremely low<br />

salaries and declining<br />

professional legitimacy<br />

<strong>Rethinking</strong> <strong>Schooling</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> 21 st <strong>Century</strong>:<br />

The State of Education <strong>for</strong> Peace, Sustainable Development and Global Citizenship in Asia<br />

197

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!