25.09.2020 Views

Rethinking Schooling for the 21st Century

UNESCO MGIEP officially launched 'Rethinking Schooling for the 21st Century: The State of Education, Peace and Sustainable Development and Global Citizenship' in 2017 at the UNESCO General Conference. This study analyses how far the ideals of SDG 4.7 are embodied in policies and curricula across 22 Asian countries and establishes benchmarks against which future progress can be assessed. It also argues forcefully that we must redefine the purposes of schooling, addressing the fundamental challenges to efforts to promote peace, sustainability and global citizenship through education.

UNESCO MGIEP officially launched 'Rethinking Schooling for the 21st Century: The State of Education, Peace and Sustainable Development and Global Citizenship' in 2017 at the UNESCO General Conference. This study analyses how far the ideals of SDG 4.7 are embodied in policies and curricula across 22 Asian countries and establishes benchmarks against which future progress can be assessed. It also argues forcefully that we must redefine the purposes of schooling, addressing the fundamental challenges to efforts to promote peace, sustainability and global citizenship through education.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Box 5.4 References to human rights in Nepal’s School Sector Development Plan<br />

(SSDP), 2016-2023<br />

The Constitution of Nepal (2015) guarantees <strong>the</strong> fundamental right to education<br />

and lays down <strong>the</strong> directive principles of <strong>the</strong> federal state and <strong>the</strong> provinces<br />

on education (p. 16, SSDP). Reflecting this guarantee, Nepal’s SSDP states:<br />

‘Every citizen shall have <strong>the</strong> right to free and compulsory basic education, and<br />

free education up to <strong>the</strong> secondary level’ (p. 17). The SSDP and <strong>the</strong> Ministry<br />

of Education have a policy of supporting mo<strong>the</strong>r tongue-based multilingual<br />

education up to grade 3 (SSDP, p. 41).<br />

Curricular engagement with <strong>the</strong> concept of human rights is far from a matter of<br />

common knowledge or expertise. The Indian NCF and several related position<br />

papers provide evidence of in-depth understanding of <strong>the</strong> challenge of using<br />

critical pedagogy to deal with violations of human rights, such as those involving<br />

equality and social justice, that are structurally embedded in culture. As<br />

manifested in a relatively low weightage on <strong>the</strong> sub-categories of democracy and<br />

civil liberties in <strong>the</strong> coding data (see Appendix II-4), documents from South Asian<br />

countries feature ra<strong>the</strong>r limited references to <strong>the</strong> wider, democratic context of<br />

human rights. A paucity of references to <strong>the</strong> sub-categories under ‘culture of<br />

peace‘ such as peace building, conflict resolution, non-violence, and awareness<br />

of <strong>for</strong>ms of abuse also suggests that <strong>the</strong> inclusion of human rights among lists<br />

of policy priorities is often somewhat tokenistic or symbolic (see Appendix II-6).<br />

Amongst <strong>the</strong> eight South Asian countries surveyed <strong>for</strong> this study, <strong>the</strong> coding<br />

data show that Afghanistan places <strong>the</strong> highest weightage on <strong>the</strong> concept of<br />

peace, covering all sub-categories. This is understandable given <strong>the</strong> unending<br />

violence suffered by <strong>the</strong> country. O<strong>the</strong>r countries that place a relatively high<br />

emphasis on this concept are India, Bhutan and Bangladesh. On <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r hand,<br />

Sri Lanka, Nepal, Pakistan and especially Iran put low emphasis on peace in<br />

policy and curricular documents. In Sri Lanka, where violent internal strife was<br />

long endemic, education ought to be seen as a major site <strong>for</strong> reflecting on and<br />

engaging with children’s experience of violent conflict. This can also be said of<br />

Nepal, where human rights figure quite highly among policy priorities. However,<br />

acknowledgement of <strong>the</strong> context and ethos in which human rights need to be<br />

addressed seem absent from policy, and especially from curriculum guidelines<br />

(where one might expect <strong>the</strong> context to be more fully elaborated). This reminds<br />

us <strong>the</strong> limits of what education, on its own, can achieve when <strong>the</strong> larger context<br />

is shaped by social and political factors that militate against <strong>the</strong> realisation of<br />

peace, sustainability and tolerance.<br />

To conclude, official conceptions of <strong>the</strong> social purpose of education are<br />

dominated in South Asia by <strong>the</strong> goal of human resource development. Some<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r aims are accorded varying levels of importance, but in official discourse<br />

<strong>the</strong>y often derive legitimacy from <strong>the</strong>ir supposed contribution to <strong>the</strong> attainment<br />

<strong>Rethinking</strong> <strong>Schooling</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> 21 st <strong>Century</strong>:<br />

The State of Education <strong>for</strong> Peace, Sustainable Development and Global Citizenship in Asia<br />

155

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!