25.09.2020 Views

Rethinking Schooling for the 21st Century

UNESCO MGIEP officially launched 'Rethinking Schooling for the 21st Century: The State of Education, Peace and Sustainable Development and Global Citizenship' in 2017 at the UNESCO General Conference. This study analyses how far the ideals of SDG 4.7 are embodied in policies and curricula across 22 Asian countries and establishes benchmarks against which future progress can be assessed. It also argues forcefully that we must redefine the purposes of schooling, addressing the fundamental challenges to efforts to promote peace, sustainability and global citizenship through education.

UNESCO MGIEP officially launched 'Rethinking Schooling for the 21st Century: The State of Education, Peace and Sustainable Development and Global Citizenship' in 2017 at the UNESCO General Conference. This study analyses how far the ideals of SDG 4.7 are embodied in policies and curricula across 22 Asian countries and establishes benchmarks against which future progress can be assessed. It also argues forcefully that we must redefine the purposes of schooling, addressing the fundamental challenges to efforts to promote peace, sustainability and global citizenship through education.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Figure 6.3 Introduction of New State Education Standards (SES) in Kazakhstan,<br />

Kyrgyzstan, Mongolia and Uzbekistan<br />

Kazakhstan:<br />

• The New General SES (launched in 2002) introduced<br />

mainly an outcome-based education<br />

program.<br />

• The State Programme of Education Development<br />

2005-2010 was developed based on <strong>the</strong><br />

acknowledgement that education standards<br />

and processes required a substantial re<strong>for</strong>m<br />

– including <strong>the</strong> transition from rote to outcome-based<br />

learning.<br />

• The nationwide discussion of <strong>the</strong> results of<br />

Kazakhstan’s participation in international<br />

monitoring studies such as <strong>the</strong> TIMSS<br />

and PISA – in particular <strong>the</strong> below-average<br />

achievement in PISA – had a direct impact on<br />

Kazakhstan’s education re<strong>for</strong>m policy (Bridges,<br />

2014). The SES were revamped in both<br />

2012 and 2016, which determined a list of<br />

compulsory subjects, programmes and study<br />

plans, and allowed each school to develop its<br />

own educational plan (Pons et al., 2015).<br />

Mongolia:<br />

• The new SES (launched in 2004) introduced<br />

a skills-based curriculum, emphasising student-centred<br />

pedagogies. Major modifications<br />

were made to <strong>the</strong> SES in 2007, 2010 and 2011<br />

to improve its implementation and outcomes.<br />

• In 2009, <strong>the</strong> newly <strong>for</strong>med government<br />

launched <strong>the</strong> Mongolian Cambridge Education<br />

Initiative in order to align Mongolia’s education<br />

system to international standards (a new<br />

curriculum was piloted in English, maths<br />

and science in selected laboratory schools).<br />

The project also aimed to review and update<br />

<strong>the</strong> National Curriculum and Assessment<br />

Framework.<br />

• Post-parliamentary elections, <strong>the</strong> Ministry<br />

launched ano<strong>the</strong>r comprehensive quality<br />

re<strong>for</strong>m program <strong>for</strong> 2012-2016, that mainly<br />

focused on skills/competencies that students<br />

must acquire – a competency-based approach<br />

to learning achievements (Sarvi, Munger and<br />

Pillay, 2015).<br />

Uzbekistan:<br />

• In compliance with <strong>the</strong> National Program <strong>for</strong><br />

Personnel Training (NPPT), <strong>the</strong> Government<br />

of Uzbekistan approved <strong>the</strong> SES <strong>for</strong> general<br />

secondary education <strong>for</strong> grades 1-9 in 1999,<br />

which incorporates a modern basic study<br />

plan, education standards <strong>for</strong> 23 subjects,<br />

standard curricula and training programs<br />

(Weidman and Yoder, 2010, p. 64).<br />

• A new SES was adopted in 2010 but could<br />

not substantially improve <strong>the</strong> standards of<br />

education (Nasirov, 2017).<br />

Kyrgyzstan:<br />

• In Kyrgyzstan, a new SES was first developed<br />

in 1996 and subsequently revised in 2002,<br />

2004 and 2015, while <strong>the</strong> Law on Education<br />

was adopted in 1992 and amended in 1997<br />

and 2003.<br />

• After much deliberation, <strong>the</strong> Government<br />

approved <strong>the</strong> new SES and an Action Plan in<br />

2015 <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> phased implementation of new<br />

generation standards in secondary education<br />

by 2022 (Soros Foundation, 2014).<br />

<strong>Rethinking</strong> <strong>Schooling</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> 21 st <strong>Century</strong>:<br />

The State of Education <strong>for</strong> Peace, Sustainable Development and Global Citizenship in Asia<br />

181

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!