25.09.2020 Views

Rethinking Schooling for the 21st Century

UNESCO MGIEP officially launched 'Rethinking Schooling for the 21st Century: The State of Education, Peace and Sustainable Development and Global Citizenship' in 2017 at the UNESCO General Conference. This study analyses how far the ideals of SDG 4.7 are embodied in policies and curricula across 22 Asian countries and establishes benchmarks against which future progress can be assessed. It also argues forcefully that we must redefine the purposes of schooling, addressing the fundamental challenges to efforts to promote peace, sustainability and global citizenship through education.

UNESCO MGIEP officially launched 'Rethinking Schooling for the 21st Century: The State of Education, Peace and Sustainable Development and Global Citizenship' in 2017 at the UNESCO General Conference. This study analyses how far the ideals of SDG 4.7 are embodied in policies and curricula across 22 Asian countries and establishes benchmarks against which future progress can be assessed. It also argues forcefully that we must redefine the purposes of schooling, addressing the fundamental challenges to efforts to promote peace, sustainability and global citizenship through education.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

emphasis on similarities (Rose, 2015, pp. 93-97). 36 Chinese textbook depictions<br />

of contemporary Japan allude to a notion of ‘eastern culture’ (dongfang wenhua),<br />

but in highly stereotypical terms — while emphasising <strong>the</strong> Chinese origins of<br />

many aspects of traditional Japanese culture. Overall, Rose concludes, China<br />

and Japan are ‘generally not portrayed as fellow constituents of a shared “East<br />

Asian” region or cultural sphere,’ with curricula in both countries featuring ‘little<br />

discussion of <strong>the</strong> nature or extent of <strong>the</strong>ir shared cultural traditions, beyond<br />

references to <strong>the</strong> (one-way) transmission of culture from China to Japan in <strong>the</strong><br />

distant past’ (p. 100).<br />

Gender<br />

What do prevalent conceptions of nationhood and development imply <strong>for</strong> gender<br />

relations? Much rhetoric on <strong>the</strong> role of women in development has tended to<br />

view this matter instrumentally; women have often been implicitly depicted<br />

as ‘mo<strong>the</strong>rs of development’, with <strong>the</strong> value of girls’ education defended by<br />

reference to its utility in ‘reducing poverty, containing population growth,<br />

engendering public health, and streng<strong>the</strong>ning <strong>the</strong> nation’ (Ross, 2006, pp. 29-30).<br />

On this matter, official curricula have little to tell us: issues of gender equality<br />

Issues of gender equality<br />

barely rate a mention in<br />

curricular documents<br />

<strong>for</strong> any of <strong>the</strong> major East<br />

Asian countries<br />

barely rate a mention in curricular documents<br />

<strong>for</strong> any of <strong>the</strong> major East Asian countries (see<br />

Appendix II-5). In <strong>the</strong> case of China and Japan,<br />

<strong>the</strong> issue appears almost entirely absent from<br />

such documents; in Korea, it rates a passing<br />

mention only in <strong>the</strong> curriculum <strong>for</strong> middle school<br />

Social Science. But this curricular ‘blind spot’ is<br />

itself highly significant.<br />

Concern <strong>for</strong> gender equality has typically taken a low priority in Japan’s public<br />

policy agenda; Japan typically comes at <strong>the</strong> very bottom of developed-country<br />

league tables <strong>for</strong> female employment, <strong>the</strong> gender pay gap and o<strong>the</strong>r measures<br />

of equality (OECD, 2012). Curricular documents indicate no concerted drive to<br />

trans<strong>for</strong>m entrenched attitudes in this area. This does not imply <strong>the</strong> complete<br />

neglect of such issues in textbooks. These feature many images of women,<br />

often stereotypical (nurses, teachers, shoppers, homemakers, receptionists<br />

and so <strong>for</strong>th), but sometimes less so. The Teikoku Shoin Civics (Koumin) text,<br />

<strong>for</strong> example, features a picture of <strong>the</strong> athlete Yoshida Saori (brandishing a<br />

Japanese flag at <strong>the</strong> London Olympics) (p. 166) and a text box on Ogata Sadako,<br />

<strong>the</strong> <strong>for</strong>mer (female) head of <strong>the</strong> UNHCR (p. 183). But <strong>the</strong> same text features only<br />

one short paragraph explicitly addressing <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>me of gender equality (p. 43),<br />

which simply outlines relevant Japanese legislation and exhorts everyone to ‘take<br />

responsibility’ <strong>for</strong> promoting equality. Tokyo Shoseki’s Civics text goes somewhat<br />

fur<strong>the</strong>r, devoting almost a whole page to this <strong>the</strong>me, and presenting a text box<br />

36 By contrast, references to Korea, according to Rose, still tend to emphasise similarities with<br />

Japan (2015, p. 96).<br />

<strong>Rethinking</strong> <strong>Schooling</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> 21 st <strong>Century</strong>:<br />

The State of Education <strong>for</strong> Peace, Sustainable Development and Global Citizenship in Asia<br />

95

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!