25.09.2020 Views

Rethinking Schooling for the 21st Century

UNESCO MGIEP officially launched 'Rethinking Schooling for the 21st Century: The State of Education, Peace and Sustainable Development and Global Citizenship' in 2017 at the UNESCO General Conference. This study analyses how far the ideals of SDG 4.7 are embodied in policies and curricula across 22 Asian countries and establishes benchmarks against which future progress can be assessed. It also argues forcefully that we must redefine the purposes of schooling, addressing the fundamental challenges to efforts to promote peace, sustainability and global citizenship through education.

UNESCO MGIEP officially launched 'Rethinking Schooling for the 21st Century: The State of Education, Peace and Sustainable Development and Global Citizenship' in 2017 at the UNESCO General Conference. This study analyses how far the ideals of SDG 4.7 are embodied in policies and curricula across 22 Asian countries and establishes benchmarks against which future progress can be assessed. It also argues forcefully that we must redefine the purposes of schooling, addressing the fundamental challenges to efforts to promote peace, sustainability and global citizenship through education.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ein<strong>for</strong>ced by <strong>the</strong> fact that Thailand hosts <strong>the</strong> Asian regional offices of UNESCO<br />

and UNICEF, which in turn work closely with SEAMEO. One ongoing initiative<br />

relevant to SDG 4.7 is <strong>the</strong> Sou<strong>the</strong>ast Asia Primary Learning Metric (SEA-PLM),<br />

developed by SEAMEO and UNICEF. This is a primary education learning metric<br />

<strong>for</strong> SEAMEO countries which covers <strong>the</strong> key domains of reading, writing,<br />

ma<strong>the</strong>matics and global citizenship <strong>for</strong> Grade 5. 42<br />

An important element of <strong>the</strong> context <strong>for</strong> understanding <strong>the</strong> urgent need <strong>for</strong><br />

reorienting education towards sustainability in this region concerns <strong>the</strong> highly<br />

uneven distribution of <strong>the</strong> benefits of rapid economic development (UNESCO,<br />

2014c). Calls <strong>for</strong> a people- ra<strong>the</strong>r than state-centric ASEAN reflect <strong>the</strong> urgency<br />

of addressing consequent socio-economic inequality, and an associated rise<br />

in social tensions, often involving ethno-religious discrimination (Rigg, 2016;<br />

Davies, 2016). These problems exist <strong>for</strong> both newly industrialising economies as<br />

well as those that have attained middle- or high-income status. Of <strong>the</strong> <strong>for</strong>mer,<br />

having emerged in 1993 from a traumatic history of genocide and communist<br />

rule, Cambodia, a constitutional monarchy with multi-party politics, has<br />

developed rapidly with substantial national and international investment. At <strong>the</strong><br />

same time, <strong>the</strong> country has suffered from chronic corruption and inequality. Viet<br />

Nam initiated its own economic opening up or doi moi policy in <strong>the</strong> 1980s, 43 and<br />

since joining <strong>the</strong> WTO in 2007 has seen its economy grow at about 6 per cent<br />

per year, with <strong>the</strong> private sector playing a vital role (McKinsey Global Institute,<br />

2012). Lao PDR, which opened its economy to <strong>for</strong>eign capital investment around<br />

<strong>the</strong> same time, has also enjoyed rapid rates of growth in recent years, although<br />

poverty, youth unemployment and <strong>the</strong> rural-urban income gap remain substantial<br />

problems (World Bank, 2015). The experience of <strong>the</strong>se countries shows that<br />

economic growth is a far from an adequate measure of ‘development’ broadly<br />

understood (see, <strong>for</strong> example, Sen, 1999), let alone of ‘sustainable development’.<br />

Among <strong>the</strong> more established economies, Malaysia, having recorded an average<br />

economic growth of 7 per cent over <strong>the</strong> past 25 years, is likely to become a<br />

high-income nation by 2020 (OECD, 2016b). The Philippines is in <strong>the</strong> medium<br />

category of <strong>the</strong> Human Development Index (HDI) and has enjoyed substantial<br />

economic growth, particularly in recent years. However, in 2012, <strong>the</strong> Philippines<br />

had <strong>the</strong> highest inequality among <strong>the</strong> middle-income countries of Sou<strong>the</strong>ast<br />

Asia (World Bank, 2014). Likewise, Indonesia has experienced both substantial<br />

economic growth and rising inequality in recent years. Thailand is similarly an<br />

upper-middle income country, but is facing a middle-income trap. It loses out<br />

on competitiveness to fellow Asian countries that can offer lower costs of<br />

production, while lacking <strong>the</strong> technological capacity to compete with highervalue-added<br />

industries in o<strong>the</strong>r countries.<br />

42 See http://www.seaplm.org/seaplm/.<br />

43 The doi moi policy is a comprehensive political and economic re<strong>for</strong>m in 1986 towards a<br />

‘socialist oriented market economy’ (Neubart and Roeckel, 2008).<br />

106<br />

Chapter 4: Sou<strong>the</strong>ast Asia

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!