25.09.2020 Views

Rethinking Schooling for the 21st Century

UNESCO MGIEP officially launched 'Rethinking Schooling for the 21st Century: The State of Education, Peace and Sustainable Development and Global Citizenship' in 2017 at the UNESCO General Conference. This study analyses how far the ideals of SDG 4.7 are embodied in policies and curricula across 22 Asian countries and establishes benchmarks against which future progress can be assessed. It also argues forcefully that we must redefine the purposes of schooling, addressing the fundamental challenges to efforts to promote peace, sustainability and global citizenship through education.

UNESCO MGIEP officially launched 'Rethinking Schooling for the 21st Century: The State of Education, Peace and Sustainable Development and Global Citizenship' in 2017 at the UNESCO General Conference. This study analyses how far the ideals of SDG 4.7 are embodied in policies and curricula across 22 Asian countries and establishes benchmarks against which future progress can be assessed. It also argues forcefully that we must redefine the purposes of schooling, addressing the fundamental challenges to efforts to promote peace, sustainability and global citizenship through education.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

of meritocracy, and <strong>the</strong> social structures and interests that such discourses help<br />

legitimise, is urgently needed to guide educational policy across South Asia.<br />

CONCLUSION<br />

This review of <strong>the</strong> South Asian region underlines <strong>the</strong> difficulty of using official<br />

policy and curricular statements as <strong>the</strong> basis <strong>for</strong> any assessment of <strong>the</strong> extent<br />

to which education is contributing to attaining goals such as peace, global<br />

citizenship and sustainability of development. Making any such assessment<br />

requires that we also consider a range of fundamental problems or questions<br />

relating to <strong>the</strong> context out of which policy emerges, and which it seeks to<br />

influence. One such question relates to systemic or institutional capacity — of <strong>the</strong><br />

system <strong>for</strong> administering schools, and of <strong>the</strong> broader policy making apparatus.<br />

Both need to be studied be<strong>for</strong>e we can arrive at any objective understanding<br />

of how education is contributing to <strong>the</strong> achievement of policy goals. In India,<br />

<strong>the</strong> national and state-level realities differ so considerably that generalization<br />

regarding <strong>the</strong> situation across <strong>the</strong> country is practically impossible.<br />

An elite stratum of private schools dominates and distorts perceptions of<br />

education amongst policy making elites — divorcing <strong>the</strong>ir own experience from<br />

that of <strong>the</strong> bulk of <strong>the</strong> population served by public schooling. This is true <strong>for</strong><br />

India, Pakistan and most of <strong>the</strong> rest of South Asia, where <strong>the</strong>re exists a growing<br />

gap between conditions in state-run schools and private schools, <strong>the</strong> latter now<br />

representing about one third of <strong>the</strong> system. The continued growth of private<br />

schooling exerts a complex and largely detrimental influence on <strong>the</strong> general<br />

education system and its capacity <strong>for</strong> contributing to <strong>the</strong> realisation of a<br />

coherent policy agenda driven by humanistic values. The assumption that state<br />

regulation alone can ensure effective public accountability and attention to <strong>the</strong><br />

broader goals of education is questionable at <strong>the</strong> best of times. But across South<br />

Asia, <strong>the</strong> regulatory powers of states have come under great strain over <strong>the</strong><br />

recent decades, as global institutions have effectively persuaded governments<br />

to shed state responsibilities and open up a market in provision of key public<br />

services to private operators. These globally endorsed policies have created new<br />

strains and contradictions in a system already steeped in attitudes of colonial<br />

condescension towards <strong>the</strong> poorer strata of society.<br />

Ideological conflicts are part of <strong>the</strong> everyday<br />

reality of South Asia. Many of <strong>the</strong>se conflicts have<br />

been managed relatively effectively by democratic<br />

institutions, but o<strong>the</strong>rs have tended towards<br />

violence. Indeed, violence has become endemic<br />

in several regions of <strong>the</strong> subcontinent, directly<br />

affecting children’s overall livelihoods and <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

opportunities <strong>for</strong> education. But even <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

majority of children, spared <strong>the</strong> direct impact of<br />

One way in which<br />

education can<br />

contribute to peace<br />

is by fostering <strong>the</strong><br />

belief that a desire <strong>for</strong><br />

peace is something<br />

shared by one’s closest<br />

neighbours<br />

<strong>Rethinking</strong> <strong>Schooling</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> 21 st <strong>Century</strong>:<br />

The State of Education <strong>for</strong> Peace, Sustainable Development and Global Citizenship in Asia<br />

167

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!