25.09.2020 Views

Rethinking Schooling for the 21st Century

UNESCO MGIEP officially launched 'Rethinking Schooling for the 21st Century: The State of Education, Peace and Sustainable Development and Global Citizenship' in 2017 at the UNESCO General Conference. This study analyses how far the ideals of SDG 4.7 are embodied in policies and curricula across 22 Asian countries and establishes benchmarks against which future progress can be assessed. It also argues forcefully that we must redefine the purposes of schooling, addressing the fundamental challenges to efforts to promote peace, sustainability and global citizenship through education.

UNESCO MGIEP officially launched 'Rethinking Schooling for the 21st Century: The State of Education, Peace and Sustainable Development and Global Citizenship' in 2017 at the UNESCO General Conference. This study analyses how far the ideals of SDG 4.7 are embodied in policies and curricula across 22 Asian countries and establishes benchmarks against which future progress can be assessed. It also argues forcefully that we must redefine the purposes of schooling, addressing the fundamental challenges to efforts to promote peace, sustainability and global citizenship through education.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

in many systems of education, <strong>the</strong> social sciences have tended to become<br />

increasingly marginalised, as natural sciences, ma<strong>the</strong>matics and often English<br />

have been prioritised. This kind of jostling between different domains of<br />

knowledge indicates <strong>the</strong> frequent lack of coherence in curricular planning, and<br />

<strong>the</strong> continued prioritisation of disciplines assumed to contribute most directly<br />

to economic growth.<br />

History and Peace<br />

In history curriculum design, two particular issues are relevant to <strong>the</strong> pursuit of<br />

peace. The first pertains to <strong>the</strong> coverage of violent conflicts in national history,<br />

especially recent history. Conventional approaches involve ei<strong>the</strong>r glorifying<br />

victory and minimising human and o<strong>the</strong>r losses incurred in wars, or emphasising<br />

<strong>the</strong> unique and incommensurable nature of one’s own national victimhood, while<br />

belittling or ignoring <strong>the</strong> suffering of <strong>for</strong>eigners. School textbooks typically<br />

celebrate successful conquests by national heroes, no matter how ancient.<br />

Such celebrations of martial glory are seen as important <strong>for</strong> nation-building. In<br />

countries whose recent history has been ruptured by internal wars or conflicts,<br />

textbooks’ role in rein<strong>for</strong>cing a sense of national identity tends to be viewed as<br />

especially vital.<br />

With very few exceptions, officially mandated approaches to history teaching, and<br />

especially <strong>the</strong> textbooks produced to support <strong>the</strong>m, adopt a disseminative style.<br />

This generally leaves little space <strong>for</strong> contemplation or critical discussion. But<br />

such space is crucial to enabling history to be used, as it can be, <strong>for</strong> exploring and<br />

understanding different points of view — <strong>for</strong> example, appreciating <strong>the</strong> suffering<br />

of o<strong>the</strong>rs, ra<strong>the</strong>r than simply dwelling on <strong>the</strong> past victimhood of one’s own nation.<br />

Relevant exercises can take various <strong>for</strong>ms, such as presenting students with<br />

documents that offer different accounts of <strong>the</strong> origins of a conflict, and asking<br />

<strong>the</strong>m to debate <strong>the</strong>se. Prompting students to consider how o<strong>the</strong>r nations look<br />

at a conflict in <strong>the</strong>ir neighbourhood can be a useful means of developing a wider<br />

and more critical perspective. Looking at <strong>the</strong> same event from <strong>the</strong> viewpoint<br />

of o<strong>the</strong>rs can lend an international or comparative dimension to <strong>the</strong> teaching<br />

of history in schools that can contribute crucially to <strong>the</strong> development of crossnational<br />

understanding.<br />

The second major issue relating to history teaching is <strong>the</strong> need <strong>for</strong> greater<br />

space <strong>for</strong> social history. Curricula and textbooks often focus exclusively on<br />

political events and heroic or leading personalities. The experiences of ordinary<br />

people — peasants, artisans, shopkeepers and so <strong>for</strong>th — are typically overlooked.<br />

Most school histories record tumultuous happenings marking <strong>the</strong> closure and<br />

inauguration of successive eras. How common people in different walks of life<br />

coped with such transitions is seldom brought into focus despite <strong>the</strong> availability<br />

of various sources such as letters, newspapers, pictures or toys that relate to<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir lives. Especially neglected are <strong>the</strong> lives of women and LGBTQIA (Blount,<br />

2004; Mayo, 2014). Their absence in history textbooks exacerbates and helps<br />

<strong>Rethinking</strong> <strong>Schooling</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> 21 st <strong>Century</strong>:<br />

The State of Education <strong>for</strong> Peace, Sustainable Development and Global Citizenship in Asia<br />

19

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!