25.09.2020 Views

Rethinking Schooling for the 21st Century

UNESCO MGIEP officially launched 'Rethinking Schooling for the 21st Century: The State of Education, Peace and Sustainable Development and Global Citizenship' in 2017 at the UNESCO General Conference. This study analyses how far the ideals of SDG 4.7 are embodied in policies and curricula across 22 Asian countries and establishes benchmarks against which future progress can be assessed. It also argues forcefully that we must redefine the purposes of schooling, addressing the fundamental challenges to efforts to promote peace, sustainability and global citizenship through education.

UNESCO MGIEP officially launched 'Rethinking Schooling for the 21st Century: The State of Education, Peace and Sustainable Development and Global Citizenship' in 2017 at the UNESCO General Conference. This study analyses how far the ideals of SDG 4.7 are embodied in policies and curricula across 22 Asian countries and establishes benchmarks against which future progress can be assessed. It also argues forcefully that we must redefine the purposes of schooling, addressing the fundamental challenges to efforts to promote peace, sustainability and global citizenship through education.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Siegfried, 2012; Weinthal, 2006). It is difficult to assess <strong>the</strong> extent to which values<br />

and competencies required <strong>for</strong> understanding and addressing <strong>the</strong>se critical<br />

issues are included in learning resources and educational practice on <strong>the</strong> ground,<br />

but policy documents and curricula across <strong>the</strong> region show little evidence of<br />

effective integration of SDG 4.7, particularly when it comes to promoting <strong>for</strong>ms<br />

of identity consciousness that transcend national divisions.<br />

Loving <strong>the</strong> ‘Mo<strong>the</strong>rland’<br />

The imperative of loving <strong>the</strong> ‘Mo<strong>the</strong>rland’ and respecting its history, culture<br />

and traditions is universally prioritized across this region. The coding data show<br />

overwhelming emphasis on national identities, patriotism and nationalism in <strong>the</strong><br />

three Central Asian states and, to a slightly lesser extent, in Mongolia (Appendix<br />

II-12i). On <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r hand, national policy documents and curricula largely neglect<br />

concepts pertaining to global citizenship (see Appendices II-7-10), with some<br />

partial exceptions. For example, Kazakhstan’s SES contains a few sections where<br />

global environmental issues, poverty, consumerism and racism are presented<br />

as issues <strong>for</strong> discussion in specific subjects (Grade 9 Biology and Geography);<br />

similarly, Kyrgyzstan’s subject curricula feature significant coverage of issues of<br />

sustainable development, with an emphasis on its transnational environmental<br />

dimension (Grade 9 History and Grade 9 Geography; see Appendix II-2).<br />

The project of building a new national identity has been most intensive in <strong>the</strong><br />

Republic of Kazakhstan, which experienced <strong>the</strong> most extensive ‘russification’ of<br />

all Central Asian Soviet republics. Building a unitary state and a bilingual and<br />

multicultural nation has also become a key priority <strong>for</strong> Kazakhstan’s political<br />

elites (Cummings, 2005). The state policy documents and President Nazarbayev’s<br />

speeches have explicitly referred to Kazakhstan as <strong>the</strong> ethnic centre of <strong>the</strong><br />

Kazakhs, and Kazakhs as <strong>the</strong> original successors to <strong>the</strong> nationhood, but<br />

simultaneously <strong>the</strong>y acknowledge <strong>the</strong> multinationalism of Kazakhstani society<br />

(see Box 6.1). The coding data show significant consistency regarding nationbuilding<br />

priorities across policy and curricular documents. Through literary<br />

readings in <strong>the</strong> Kazakh language, <strong>for</strong> instance, <strong>the</strong> objective is to ‘foster respect<br />

<strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> language, culture, history of <strong>the</strong> Kazakh people, love <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> Mo<strong>the</strong>rland,<br />

[and] <strong>the</strong> Republic of Kazakhstan’ 83 (Grade 4, p. 2); similar objectives are echoed<br />

in <strong>the</strong> curricula of o<strong>the</strong>r subjects.<br />

In Kyrgyzstan, as elsewhere in Central Asia, developing a new state ideology that<br />

integrates concepts such as <strong>the</strong> nation, freedom, responsibility and development<br />

has been viewed as a key to successful nation-building (Murzakulova and<br />

Schoeberlein, 2009). The SES presents <strong>the</strong> aim of education as developing ‘love<br />

<strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> Mo<strong>the</strong>rland, respect <strong>for</strong> national traditions, and respect <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> cultural<br />

83 Original in Russian: ‘с предметом «Литературное чтение»: через аутентные тексты<br />

учащиеся учатся высказывать свое мнение с учетом познавательных особенностей<br />

казахского языка; воспитывает уважение к языку, культуре, истории казахского<br />

народа, любовь к Родине, к Республике Казахстан’.<br />

190<br />

Chapter 6: Central Asia and Mongolia

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!