25.09.2020 Views

Rethinking Schooling for the 21st Century

UNESCO MGIEP officially launched 'Rethinking Schooling for the 21st Century: The State of Education, Peace and Sustainable Development and Global Citizenship' in 2017 at the UNESCO General Conference. This study analyses how far the ideals of SDG 4.7 are embodied in policies and curricula across 22 Asian countries and establishes benchmarks against which future progress can be assessed. It also argues forcefully that we must redefine the purposes of schooling, addressing the fundamental challenges to efforts to promote peace, sustainability and global citizenship through education.

UNESCO MGIEP officially launched 'Rethinking Schooling for the 21st Century: The State of Education, Peace and Sustainable Development and Global Citizenship' in 2017 at the UNESCO General Conference. This study analyses how far the ideals of SDG 4.7 are embodied in policies and curricula across 22 Asian countries and establishes benchmarks against which future progress can be assessed. It also argues forcefully that we must redefine the purposes of schooling, addressing the fundamental challenges to efforts to promote peace, sustainability and global citizenship through education.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

interconnections, interdependence’ is likely a reflection of official attempts to<br />

promote <strong>the</strong> country's role as an aid donor and partner <strong>for</strong> developing countries<br />

across Asia and Africa. While 'multiculturalism/interculturalism' also receives<br />

a very high weightage in some o<strong>the</strong>r Asian countries marked with high ethnic<br />

diversity (Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Sri Lanka, India, Indonesia, <strong>the</strong> Philippines,<br />

Thailand) (see Figure 2.7), most of <strong>the</strong>m accord no weightage to transnational<br />

interconnectedness, with <strong>the</strong> exceptions of India (moderate weightage) and<br />

Kyrgyzstan (low weightage).<br />

KEY INSIGHTS FOR SDG 4.7 POLICY AND<br />

CURRICULUM MONITORING<br />

Fully capturing <strong>the</strong> intent of 4.7 is a daunting task. Firstly, concepts embedded in<br />

4.7 have contested definitions and many have yet to achieve widespread currency<br />

in local languages. UNESCO (2016b) promotes ESD and GCED as two mutually<br />

rein<strong>for</strong>cing pillars of 4.7 implementation, but <strong>the</strong>y still lack internationally agreed<br />

definitions and <strong>the</strong>re is often little conceptual clarity about what qualifies as<br />

ESD and GCED — or ‘sustainable development’ and ‘global citizenship’ <strong>for</strong> that<br />

matter (see Chapter 1). The coding results strongly indicate that key concepts<br />

associated with SDG 4.7 are often deployed in ways that are not in fact aligned<br />

with pursuit of <strong>the</strong> goals of sustainable development and global citizenship.<br />

The interpretation of <strong>the</strong> coding results here underlines <strong>the</strong> importance of<br />

carefully examining <strong>the</strong> constituent components of concepts related to SDG 4.7<br />

to illuminate <strong>the</strong> extent to which different countries have integrated <strong>the</strong> ideas<br />

of peace, sustainable development and global citizenship in <strong>the</strong>ir policies and<br />

curricula.<br />

Key insight 1:<br />

The coding data point to <strong>the</strong> need to scrutinise <strong>the</strong> constituent<br />

components of <strong>the</strong> different key concepts associated with SDG<br />

4.7 to assess <strong>the</strong> extent to which ESD/GCED is integrated in<br />

education policies and curricula.<br />

Secondly, capturing <strong>the</strong> trans<strong>for</strong>mative aspirations of 4.7 is not only technically<br />

but also politically challenging, because such aspirations could contradict key<br />

objectives of national curricula. The SDG4-Education 2030 Agenda reaffirms<br />

<strong>the</strong> right to education <strong>for</strong> all, and recognises <strong>the</strong> role of education in achieving<br />

goals beyond economic growth and national development. The overwhelming<br />

emphasis on <strong>the</strong> instrumental role of education in fostering national identity and<br />

generating ‘human resources’ <strong>for</strong> economic development (see Trend 2) points<br />

towards <strong>the</strong> challenge of implementing SDG 4.7 in countries across Asia. The<br />

coding data certainly reflect widespread awareness of many of <strong>the</strong> concepts<br />

associated with SDG 4.7, but determining what this actually signifies requires<br />

a closer examination of social and political conditions of <strong>the</strong> countries under<br />

review.<br />

56<br />

Chapter 2: Key Findings and Insights

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!