25.09.2020 Views

Rethinking Schooling for the 21st Century

UNESCO MGIEP officially launched 'Rethinking Schooling for the 21st Century: The State of Education, Peace and Sustainable Development and Global Citizenship' in 2017 at the UNESCO General Conference. This study analyses how far the ideals of SDG 4.7 are embodied in policies and curricula across 22 Asian countries and establishes benchmarks against which future progress can be assessed. It also argues forcefully that we must redefine the purposes of schooling, addressing the fundamental challenges to efforts to promote peace, sustainability and global citizenship through education.

UNESCO MGIEP officially launched 'Rethinking Schooling for the 21st Century: The State of Education, Peace and Sustainable Development and Global Citizenship' in 2017 at the UNESCO General Conference. This study analyses how far the ideals of SDG 4.7 are embodied in policies and curricula across 22 Asian countries and establishes benchmarks against which future progress can be assessed. It also argues forcefully that we must redefine the purposes of schooling, addressing the fundamental challenges to efforts to promote peace, sustainability and global citizenship through education.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Figure 2.5 The prevalence of <strong>the</strong> concept ‘gender equality’<br />

Countries that accord high weightage to ‘gender equality’ are concentrated in<br />

South Asia.<br />

A paucity or absence of references to ‘gender equality’ in education policy and<br />

curriculum is observed both in some countries which rate very high as well as in<br />

o<strong>the</strong>rs that score very low in <strong>the</strong> Gender Development Index.<br />

Gender Development Index (GDI) (2015) Gender equality (category 5)<br />

Prevalence<br />

Very High High Moderate Low Very Low NA Very High High Moderate Low Absent<br />

Source: UNDP. 2017. Gender Development Index (GDI).<br />

http://hdr.undp.org/en/composite/GDI (Accessed 30 September 2017).<br />

particular paucity of references to gender in this region can perhaps be partially<br />

explained as <strong>the</strong> legacy of egalitarian Soviet ideals of ‘gender-blindness’ (see<br />

Chapter 6).<br />

A paucity or absence of references to ‘gender equality’ is observed both in some<br />

countries which rate very high as well as in o<strong>the</strong>rs that score very low in <strong>the</strong><br />

Gender Development Index. 17 The meaning of <strong>the</strong> coding results <strong>the</strong>re<strong>for</strong>e must<br />

be examined on a case-by-case basis — as is attempted in <strong>the</strong> regionally-focused<br />

chapters in Part II. The anomalous pattern of references to gender illustrates<br />

<strong>the</strong> problems involved in basing any monitoring ef<strong>for</strong>ts simply on counting <strong>the</strong><br />

‘presence’ or ‘absence’ of 4.7-related concepts in <strong>the</strong> official documents.<br />

17 See http://hdr.undp.org/en/content/gender-development-index-gdi.<br />

52<br />

Chapter 2: Key Findings and Insights

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!