26.12.2012 Views

IARC MONOGRAPHS ON THE EVALUATION OF CARCINOGENIC ...

IARC MONOGRAPHS ON THE EVALUATION OF CARCINOGENIC ...

IARC MONOGRAPHS ON THE EVALUATION OF CARCINOGENIC ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

AFLATOXINS 241<br />

during DNA replication and repair, can influence not only the overall mutation frequency<br />

but also the distribution of mutations.<br />

An intrasanguineous host-mediated assay was used to determine the pattern of mutagenesis<br />

induced by aflatoxin B 1 in the lacI gene of E. coli bacteria recovered from rat<br />

liver. Most of the 281 mutations analysed were base substitutions at GC base pairs; over<br />

half were GC to TA transversions, with other mutations evenly divided between GC to<br />

AT transitions and GC to CG transversions (Prieto-Alamo et al., 1996).<br />

In a human lymphoblastoid cell line (h1A2v2) expressing recombinant human<br />

CYP1A1 enzyme, aflatoxin B 1 (4 ng/mL; 25 h) produced a hotspot GC to TA transversion<br />

mutation at base pair 209 in exon 3 of the HPRT gene in 10–17% of all mutants<br />

(Cariello et al., 1994). This hotspot occurred at a GGGGGG sequence (target base<br />

underlined).<br />

Bailey et al. (1996) studied the induction of mutations with two of the principal<br />

forms of DNA damage induced by aflatoxin B 1, namely the AFB 1–N7-Gua adduct and<br />

the consequent apurinic sites, by site-directed mutagenesis. Single-stranded M13 bacteriophage<br />

DNA containing a unique AFB 1–N7-Gua adduct or an apurinic site was used to<br />

transform E. coli. The predominant mutations with AFB 1–N7-Gua were G to T transversions<br />

targeted to the site of the original adduct (approximately 74%), with lower<br />

frequencies of G to A transitions (13–18%) and G to C transversions (1–3%). Using<br />

E. coli strains differing in biochemical activity of UmuDC and MucAB — proteins<br />

involved in processing of apurinic sites by insertion of dAMP — the authors showed that<br />

the mutations observed with the AFB 1–N7-Gua were not predominantly a simple result<br />

of depurination of the initial adduct. A significant number of base substitutions were<br />

located at the base 5′ to the site of the original adduct, representing around 13% of the<br />

total mutations. This induction of mutations at the base adjacent to the original site of<br />

damage was not observed with apurinic sites as the mutagenic lesion. This was suggested<br />

to reflect interference with DNA replication following the intercalation of aflatoxin B 1<br />

8,9-epoxide (Gopalakrishnan et al., 1990).<br />

Earlier studies suggested general sequence preferences for aflatoxin B 1 binding<br />

dependent on the target guanine being located in a sequence of guanines or with a 5′<br />

cytosine (<strong>IARC</strong>, 1993). The base 3′ to the modified G appears less consistently<br />

predictive of reactivity. Results on sequence-specific binding have been reviewed (Smela<br />

et al., 2001). In this context, the question has been raised as to whether cytosine methylation<br />

affects the binding of aflatoxin B 1. Ross et al. (1999) examined the effect of CpG<br />

methylation on binding of aflatoxin B 1 8,9-epoxide to an 11-mer oligodeoxynucleotide<br />

containing the sequence of codons 248 and 249 of the TP53 gene (see Section 4.4.1(b)).<br />

Binding to methylated or unmethylated fragments of the human HPRT gene was also<br />

investigated. In neither instance did cytosine methylation affect aflatoxin B 1 binding to<br />

guanines within the sequence. In contrast, Chen et al. (1998) reported strongly enhanced<br />

binding of aflatoxin B 1 to methylated compared with non-methylated CpG sites in TP53<br />

mutational hotspots, including codon 248, using an UvrABC incision method. The

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!