26.12.2012 Views

IARC MONOGRAPHS ON THE EVALUATION OF CARCINOGENIC ...

IARC MONOGRAPHS ON THE EVALUATION OF CARCINOGENIC ...

IARC MONOGRAPHS ON THE EVALUATION OF CARCINOGENIC ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ANNEX 291<br />

incidence (JECFA, 2001; see Section 5). However, uncertainty remains regarding (1) the<br />

health effects of occasional high exposures occurring due to unusual weather patterns, in<br />

comparison with those due to normal chronic exposure; (2) the effect of combinations of<br />

mycotoxins, e.g. aflatoxins and fumonisins, on cancer risk; and (3) the broader health<br />

effects of aflatoxin exposure. Under the latter consideration, the most important aspects<br />

are (1) the greater sensitivity of children to acute toxicity of aflatoxins as compared with<br />

adults; (2) the in-utero effects of aflatoxins, known to cross the placenta; (3) the immunosuppressive<br />

effects of aflatoxins, which may influence susceptibility to infectious<br />

disease; (4) the suppressive effects of aflatoxins on growth; and (5) the interactions<br />

between HCV, HBV and aflatoxins in liver cancer development in various populations<br />

in the world.<br />

The areas mentioned are important ones for future research, to provide information<br />

of direct relevance to public health decisions regarding aflatoxin exposure.<br />

5. Previous Recommendations<br />

Although some countries with fully developed market economies have enforced<br />

regulations on aflatoxins for some 30 years, it is only recently that a broader consensus<br />

has been developed on the impact of aflatoxins and other agriculturally important toxins<br />

on human populations. The health effects include those resulting from exposure in foods,<br />

from reductions in the quality of the crops affected and from reduced animal production.<br />

The health consequences of lowered income are also pertinent in some communities.<br />

This consensus was reached when the Joint Food and Agriculture Organization/World<br />

Health Organization (FAO/WHO) Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA) established<br />

an hypothetical standard for aflatoxins (JECFA, 1998), provisional maximum<br />

tolerable daily intakes (PMTDIs) for deoxynivalenol and fumonisins and a provisional<br />

tolerable weekly intake (PTWI) for ochratoxin A (JECFA, 2001). For aflatoxin and<br />

fumonisin, exposure in excess of the PMTDI occurs in much of Africa as well as parts<br />

of Asia and South America.<br />

JECFA attempted to separate the portion of risk of liver cancer attributable to aflatoxin<br />

from the risk attributable to other factors (JECFA, 1998, 2001). JECFA modelled<br />

dose–response curves from laboratory animal studies as well as human epidemiological<br />

studies of aflatoxin carcinogenicity. The risk of liver cancer from aflatoxin consumption<br />

was significantly higher (perhaps 30-fold) in individuals who were chronically infected<br />

with hepatitis B virus (hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-positive) than in those who<br />

were not (HBsAg-negative).<br />

It was concluded that populations such as those in western Europe and the USA with<br />

a low prevalence of HBsAg-positive individuals or populations with a low mean intake<br />

of aflatoxins are unlikely to achieve a decrease in liver cancer cases from more stringent

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!