26.12.2012 Views

IARC MONOGRAPHS ON THE EVALUATION OF CARCINOGENIC ...

IARC MONOGRAPHS ON THE EVALUATION OF CARCINOGENIC ...

IARC MONOGRAPHS ON THE EVALUATION OF CARCINOGENIC ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

STYRENE 447<br />

successive layers of chopped and/or woven fibre glass are deposited manually or with a<br />

chopper gun at the same time as the resin is sprayed or brushed on, and then the surface<br />

is rolled. During lamination and curing, about 10% of the styrene may evaporate into the<br />

workplace air (National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, 1983; Crandall &<br />

Hartle, 1985). Exposure to styrene in this industry has been extensively documented and<br />

summarized in several reports (National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health,<br />

1983; WHO, 1983; Pfäffli & Säämänen, 1993). Table 4 lists levels of occupational exposure<br />

to styrene (personal breathing zone samples) reported in various countries in the<br />

larger studies.<br />

Among the biological monitoring methods available (Section 1.1.5(b)), measurements<br />

of mandelic acid and phenylglyoxylic acid (see Section 4.1.1(c)) in urine are the<br />

most commonly used biological indices of exposure to styrene. Table 5 gives the concentrations<br />

of the classical biological indicators of exposure from various studies. Symanski<br />

et al. (2001) examined the variation in urinary levels of mandelic acid and phenylglyoxylic<br />

acid among workers exposed to styrene in the reinforced plastics industry. Levels<br />

of phenylglyoxylic acid varied less than those of mandelic acid, as did metabolite levels<br />

expressed in terms of urinary creatinine concentration. Urinary metabolite levels were<br />

highest for laminators and for samples collected at the end of the working week.<br />

Several factors influence the level of styrene in air. The manufacture of objects with<br />

large surface area, such as boats, truck parts, baths and showers, by the open-mould<br />

process results in the highest exposure. Data from 28 plants producing reinforced plastics<br />

products in the USA showed that the average exposure to styrene in open-mould<br />

processes was two to three times higher than that in press-mould processes: 24–82 ppm<br />

[102–350 mg/m 3 ] versus 11–26 ppm [47–111 mg/m 3 ] (Lemasters et al., 1985). In a<br />

detailed survey of 12 plants making fibreglass in Washington State, USA, 40% of 8-h<br />

samples contained more than 100 ppm [430 mg/m 3 ]. Chopper gun operators had the<br />

highest exposure, followed by laminators and gel-coat applicators; boat-building<br />

involved higher exposures than any other sector. For 11 plants, a relationship was seen<br />

between level of exposure and the quantity of resin consumed per month per exposed<br />

employee (Schumacher et al., 1981). Similar results were reported by Sullivan and<br />

Sullivan (1986) in their survey of 10 plants in Ontario, Canada, who also noted that<br />

although dilution ventilation and often auxiliary fans were used in almost all plants, there<br />

was little use of local exhaust ventilation. This was also the case for boat construction in<br />

the USA. Gel coaters have lower exposure because they generally work in ventilated<br />

booths (Crandall & Hartle, 1985). The presence of flexible exhaust ventilation hoses was<br />

reported to reduce styrene concentrations by a factor of two at a boat construction<br />

company in Japan (Ikeda et al., 1982). So-called ‘low-styrene emission resins’ are in<br />

theory promising for reducing exposure, but their potential to do so in the workplace has<br />

not been sufficiently validated and they are not widely used (A.D. Little, Inc., 1981;<br />

Sullivan & Sullivan, 1986; Säämänen et al., 1993).<br />

An extensive data source on exposures to styrene in the styrene composites manufacturing<br />

industry is the report of a study conducted in 1986 by Cal/OSHA (1986). This

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!