26.12.2012 Views

IARC MONOGRAPHS ON THE EVALUATION OF CARCINOGENIC ...

IARC MONOGRAPHS ON THE EVALUATION OF CARCINOGENIC ...

IARC MONOGRAPHS ON THE EVALUATION OF CARCINOGENIC ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Male Swiss Webster mice and male Sprague-Dawley rats were exposed to naphthalene<br />

(0–110 ppm) [0–580 mg/m 3 ] for 4 h via whole-body inhalation (West et al., 2001).<br />

Other groups of mice were given an intraperitoneal injection of 0, 50, 100, 200 or<br />

400 mg/kg bw naphthalene. Inhalation exposure of rats to naphthalene did not result in<br />

any detectable changes in the airway epithelial cells. In mice, exposure to naphthalene at<br />

concentrations above 2 ppm [10.5 mg/m 3 ] resulted in a concentration-dependent increase<br />

in Clara cell injury. At low concentrations, naphthalene caused injury in the proximal<br />

airways, while at high concentrations, there was injury both in proximal airways and in<br />

the more distal conducting airways. Parenteral exposure of mice to naphthalene caused<br />

injury that was limited to the distal airways at low dose (≤ 200 mg/kg bw), while at<br />

higher doses (> 300 mg/kg bw), the injury also included the proximal conducting airways.<br />

The higher sensitivity of the distal airways was initially attributed to higher rates<br />

of naphthalene metabolism (Buckpitt et al., 1995), but the results of West et al. (2001)<br />

suggest that cells throughout the airways are equally sensitive and that sensitivity differences<br />

between proximal and distal airways to naphthalene treatment may be due to<br />

differences in the distribution of the compound, although there are no data to support this<br />

suggestion. In conclusion, the pattern of injury after exposure to naphthalene is speciesspecific<br />

and highly dependent on route of exposure.<br />

The ability of naphthalene to cause oxidative stress was assessed in female Sprague-<br />

Dawley rats (weighing 160–180 g) given vitamin E succinate for three days and then<br />

administered 1100 mg/kg bw naphthalene as a single oral dose on day 4. Another group<br />

of rats received naphthalene alone. Naphthalene induced oxidative stress as measured by<br />

increased lipid peroxidation in mitochondria in liver and brain and reduction of glutathione<br />

concentrations in these organs. The treatment also increased DNA single-strand<br />

breaks in liver tissue, and induced an increase in membrane fluidity in liver and brain<br />

microsomes, together with increases in the urinary elimination of malonaldehyde,<br />

formaldehyde, acetaldehyde and acetone. These indices of oxidative stress were less<br />

strong in the rats that had been pretreated with vitamin E succinate (Vuchetich et al.,<br />

1996). [The Working Group noted the high dose used in this study.]<br />

(b) In-vivo studies with multiple doses<br />

NAPHTHALENE 405<br />

Yamauchi et al. (1986) reported that daily administration of oral doses [number of<br />

days not given] of 1 g/kg bw naphthalene to male Wistar rats (weighing 150–170 g)<br />

resulted in increases in levels of serum and liver lipid peroxides, suggesting enhanced<br />

lipid peroxidation. Oral administration of naphthalene in dose increments up to<br />

750 mg/kg bw over nine weeks also enhanced lipid peroxidation and decreased the activity<br />

of selenium-dependent glutathione peroxidase in the liver of male Blue-Spruce rats<br />

(Germansky & Jamall, 1988).<br />

Male albino rats (weighing 100–125 g) were administered 1 g/kg bw naphthalene<br />

orally in refined groundnut oil daily for 10 days. Biochemical alterations in the liver,<br />

kidney and eye were evaluated. Significant changes were observed only in the liver,<br />

including increased liver weight, lipid peroxidation and aniline hydroxylase activity.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!