26.12.2012 Views

IARC MONOGRAPHS ON THE EVALUATION OF CARCINOGENIC ...

IARC MONOGRAPHS ON THE EVALUATION OF CARCINOGENIC ...

IARC MONOGRAPHS ON THE EVALUATION OF CARCINOGENIC ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

3.2 Chemical methods<br />

The alkali process usually practised to produce refined table oil completely removes<br />

aflatoxin (ICMSF, 1996).<br />

The use of chemicals to inactivate, bind or remove aflatoxins has been studied extensively.<br />

Any such procedure must effectively inactivate or remove the toxin, while maintaining<br />

the nutritional and technological properties of the product and without generating<br />

toxic reaction products (López-García & Park, 1998). Food safety demonstration studies<br />

must be conducted to ensure compliance with regulatory requirements. To date, these<br />

chemical methods have been approved only for the reduction of aflatoxins in animal feed<br />

commodities. Reacting the toxin chemically with another compound intentionally introduced<br />

in the vicinity of the toxin molecule holds the greatest promise for rapid and effective<br />

removal or inactivation of aflatoxin. Among such techniques are the use of chemosorbents<br />

and ammoniation. Other than the demonstrated reduction in bioavailability of<br />

aflatoxin as a result of hydrated sodium calcium aluminosilicate binding (Phillips et al.,<br />

1988), ammoniation is the only chemical inactivation process that has been shown to<br />

destroy aflatoxin efficiently in cottonseed and cottonseed meal, peanuts and peanut meal<br />

and maize (Park et al., 1988; Park & Price, 2001).<br />

3.2.1 Aflatoxin-binding agents<br />

Adsorption of aflatoxin using activated carbons, clays and aluminosilicates has been<br />

demonstrated in a number of studies. Bentonite clays (Masimango et al., 1979) and<br />

activated charcoal (Decker, 1980), both used in oil purification, can adsorb up to 92% of<br />

aflatoxin present. A phyllosilicate clay currently used as an anti-caking agent has been<br />

shown to bind aflatoxin tightly and diminish markedly its uptake into the circulatory<br />

system, preventing aflatoxicoses and reducing levels of aflatoxin M 1 in milk (Phillips<br />

et al., 1988). The specificity of the clays and their potential for binding nutrients in addition<br />

to aflatoxin remains a concern. Further research is required to determine whether<br />

these materials can be used in human foods.<br />

3.2.2 The ammoniation process<br />

ANNEX 285<br />

The ammoniation process has been used to reduce aflatoxin levels in feed ration<br />

components in order to prevent the presence of aflatoxin in tissues and animal products<br />

such as milk. In the USA, the States of Arizona, California and Texas permit the ammoniation<br />

of cottonseed products. Texas has, in addition, approved the ammoniation procedure<br />

for aflatoxin-contaminated corn, but the treated corn may only be used in finishing<br />

beef cattle diets. Ammoniation is used in Brazil, France, Mexico, Senegal, Sudan and<br />

some states of the USA to lower aflatoxin contamination levels in animal feeds. The two<br />

procedures in widespread use are: (a) a high-pressure and high-temperature process<br />

(HP/HT) used at treatment plants, and (b) an atmospheric-pressure and ambient-temperature<br />

procedure (AP/AT) that can be used on the farm (Table 2). The HP/HT process

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!