26.12.2012 Views

IARC MONOGRAPHS ON THE EVALUATION OF CARCINOGENIC ...

IARC MONOGRAPHS ON THE EVALUATION OF CARCINOGENIC ...

IARC MONOGRAPHS ON THE EVALUATION OF CARCINOGENIC ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

472<br />

<strong>IARC</strong> <strong>M<strong>ON</strong>OGRAPHS</strong> VOLUME 82<br />

more than the number expected (SMR, 1.1; 95% CI, 0.88–1.3). There were 48 observed<br />

deaths from leukaemia in the overall cohort (SMR, 1.3; 95% CI, 0.97–1.7). There was a<br />

statistically significant excess of leukaemia among workers in polymerization (15 deaths;<br />

SMR, 2.5; 95% CI, 1.4–4.1), maintenance labour (13 deaths; SMR, 2.7; 95% CI, 1.4–4.5)<br />

and laboratories (10 deaths; SMR, 4.3; 95% CI, 2.1–7.9), which were three areas with<br />

potential for relatively high exposure to 1,3-butadiene or styrene monomers. Among the<br />

‘ever hourly-paid’ workers with 10 or more years of employment and 20 or more years<br />

since hire, there was a significant excess of leukaemia deaths (28 deaths; SMR, 2.2;<br />

95% CI, 1.5–3.2).<br />

Delzell et al. (2001) and Sielken & Valdez-Flores (2001) re-analysed the University<br />

of Alabama results on leukaemia deaths within the US and Canadian cohorts. In these<br />

studies, the exposure assessments for 1,3-butadiene and styrene were revised, as compared<br />

with the earlier report (Macaluso et al., 1996) and exposure estimates were developed<br />

for dimethyldithiocarbamate (DMDTC). [The Working Group noted that, unlike in<br />

the earlier report, assessment of exposure was performed after knowing the jobs and<br />

departments of the leukaemia cases.] Workers from two facilities had exposure records<br />

of insufficient quality and were dropped from the original study, leaving 13 130 men<br />

from six of the plants, and 59 deaths from leukaemia (medical records were obtained for<br />

48 cases and one case was an acute unspecified leukaemia) during 1943–91 (in 234 416<br />

person–years). Vital status was known for over 99% of the subjects, and death certificates<br />

were available for 98% of the decedents. In the within-cohort comparisons (Poisson<br />

regression), unlike in the cohort (SMR) study, all leukaemia deaths (leukaemia being<br />

either an underlying or a contributing cause of death) were used; 49 of the leukaemia<br />

deaths were confirmed from medical records. About 79% of the cohort subjects were<br />

exposed to 1,3-butadiene, the median cumulative exposure being 71 ppm–years<br />

[301 mg/m 3 –years], and 85% to styrene, with a median cumulative exposure of 17 ppm–<br />

years [72 mg/m 3 –years], and 62% to DMDTC with a median cumulative exposure 1 of<br />

373.9 mg–years/cm. Poisson regression analyses with the individual exposures indicated<br />

a positive and monotonically increasing association between grouped cumulative exposure<br />

to styrene (relative risks of 1.0, 1.2, 2.3 and 3.2, for exposures of 0, > 0–< 20.6,<br />

20.6–< 60.4 and ≥ 60.4 ppm–years) and leukaemia, and between exposure to 1,3-butadiene<br />

and leukaemia. For both of the exposures, a statistically significant relative risk<br />

was obtained for the highest cumulative exposure category (for styrene: relative risk, 3.2;<br />

95% CI, 1.2–8.8; 18 deaths; for 1,3-butadiene: relative risk, 3.8; 95% CI, 1.6–9.1; 17<br />

deaths). The exposure–response relationship for DMDTC and leukaemia did not increase<br />

monotonically, but a significantly increased relative risk was observed for each of the<br />

exposed groups. In models that included all three exposures, the exposure–response<br />

1 The DMDTC exposure estimation procedure yielded: (1) an estimate of the concentration of DMDTC in<br />

the solution wetting the skin of the exposed worker (in mg/cm 3 ); (2) an estimate of the skin surface exposed<br />

(in cm 2 ); and (3) an estimate of the frequency and duration of exposure. The exposure intensity unit was<br />

(mg/cm 3 ) × (cm 2 ) = mg/cm.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!