05.01.2013 Views

Perceptual Coherence : Hearing and Seeing

Perceptual Coherence : Hearing and Seeing

Perceptual Coherence : Hearing and Seeing

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

116 <strong>Perceptual</strong> <strong>Coherence</strong><br />

Field argued that a 1/f amplitude relationship would occur if the relative<br />

contrasts were independent of viewing distance. Imagine taking a simple<br />

picture of a black-<strong>and</strong>-white grating <strong>and</strong> moving it twice the distance away.<br />

Now the black-<strong>and</strong>-white bars are half as wide, so that the frequency of the<br />

grating is twice the original frequency. If the amplitude falls off at 1/f, each<br />

octave will still have equal energy, so that the relative power in each doubled<br />

frequency will not change. Moreover, each octave will have the same<br />

variance (i.e., the same amount of information), so that if each neural unit<br />

has the same b<strong>and</strong>width, each will transmit an equal amount of information.<br />

Ruderman (1997) pointed out that the 1/f relationship for natural<br />

scenes is remarkably constant even for striking changes in the brightness of<br />

individual pixels. A strong test of the 1/f relationship can be done by first<br />

averaging small blocks of pixels, say all 2 × 2 blocks, <strong>and</strong> then demonstrating<br />

that the 1/f relationship still holds for the averaged signal. (Since mixing<br />

pixels reduces the total contrast, the contrast would need to be<br />

renormalized.) As an extreme case of blocking, Ruderman converted all<br />

pixels below the average brightness to black <strong>and</strong> all pixels above average<br />

brightness to white. All such conversions did not affect the 1/f scaling,<br />

demonstrating that whatever statistical structure exists at one spatial (i.e.,<br />

angular) grain exists at all levels of the grain.<br />

Up to this point, the 1/f amplitude-scaling factor was calculated by measuring<br />

the correlations among the pixels in one static image, although it is<br />

clear that images change gradually in time just as they change in space.<br />

Dong <strong>and</strong> Atick (1995) argued that in general it is impossible to separate<br />

the spatial <strong>and</strong> temporal variation. However, in cases in which the spatial<br />

<strong>and</strong> temporal regularities can be separated, the temporal power scaling factor<br />

is 1/w 2 (in Hz) <strong>and</strong> the amplitude scaling factor is 1/f (also see Hateren,<br />

1993). Thus the spatial <strong>and</strong> temporal scaling factors are roughly the same.<br />

To explain this outcome, Dong <strong>and</strong> Atick suggested that there is a distribution<br />

of static images at different distances <strong>and</strong> also that there is a distribution<br />

of relative motions at different velocities (essentially the same type<br />

of distribution found for relative contrast levels).<br />

Implications of 1/f c Power Laws<br />

Why is this important? Remember the basic argument in chapter 1 that contrast<br />

provides the critical information for audition <strong>and</strong> vision. If the amplitude<br />

falls off at 1/f, then there will be roughly equal contrast auditory <strong>and</strong><br />

visual energy in all octave b<strong>and</strong>widths. If the visual system or the auditory<br />

system is organized into sensors with octave b<strong>and</strong>widths, which seemed to<br />

be true for the visual <strong>and</strong> auditory space-time receptive fields described in<br />

chapter 2, then each sensor will encode <strong>and</strong> transmit an equal amount of information<br />

about the contrast in terms of the variance in its firing rate. As is

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!