05.01.2013 Views

Perceptual Coherence : Hearing and Seeing

Perceptual Coherence : Hearing and Seeing

Perceptual Coherence : Hearing and Seeing

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

14 <strong>Perceptual</strong> <strong>Coherence</strong><br />

must judge whether two shapes can be matched by simple rigid rotations or<br />

reflections. But often the new stimulus is a more complex transformation of<br />

the original one, such as matching baby to adult pictures or matching an<br />

instrument or singer at one pitch to an instrument or singer at a different<br />

pitch. In both of these cases, the perception of whether the two pictures or<br />

two sounds came from the same source must depend on the creation of<br />

a trajectory that allows the observer to predict how people age or how a<br />

novel note would sound. I would argue that the correspondence problem is<br />

harder for listening because sounds at different pitches <strong>and</strong> loudness often<br />

change in nonmonotonic ways due to simultaneous variation in the excitation<br />

<strong>and</strong> resonant filters. The transformation simultaneously defines inclusion<br />

<strong>and</strong> exclusion: the set of pictures <strong>and</strong> sounds that come from one<br />

object <strong>and</strong> those that come from other objects.<br />

Inherent Limitations on Certainty<br />

Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle states that there is an inevitable trade-off<br />

between precision in the knowledge of a particle’s position <strong>and</strong> precision<br />

in the knowledge of the momentum of the same particle. Niels Bohr<br />

broadened this concept by arguing that two perspectives may be necessary<br />

to underst<strong>and</strong> a phenomenon, <strong>and</strong> yet the measurement of those two perspectives<br />

may require fundamentally incompatible experimental procedures<br />

(Greenspan, 2001). These ideas can be understood to set limits on the<br />

resolution of sensory systems. For vision, there is a reciprocal limitation<br />

for space <strong>and</strong> time (<strong>and</strong>, as illustrated in chapter 2, a reciprocal limitation<br />

between spatial frequency <strong>and</strong> spatial orientation). Resolution is equivalent<br />

to the reliability or uncertainty of the measurement; increasing the resolution<br />

reduces the “blur” of the property. The resolution can be defined as the<br />

square root of the variance of repeated measurements. 2<br />

For audition, there is a reciprocal limitation between resolution in frequency<br />

<strong>and</strong> in time. To simultaneously measure the duration <strong>and</strong> frequency<br />

of a short segment, the resolution of duration restricts the resolution of the<br />

spectral components <strong>and</strong> vice versa. Suppose we define the resolution of<br />

frequency <strong>and</strong> time so that (∆F)(∆T) = 1. 3 Thus, a temporal resolution of<br />

1/100 s restricts our frequency resolution to 100 Hz so that it would be impossible<br />

to distinguish between two sounds that differ by less than 100 Hz.<br />

Gabor (1946) has discussed how to achieve an optimal balance between<br />

frequency <strong>and</strong> space or time uncertainty in the sense of minimizing the<br />

2. In chapter 9, we will see that resolution also determines the optimal way to combine<br />

auditory <strong>and</strong> visual information.<br />

3. In general, (∆F)(∆T) = constant, <strong>and</strong> the value of the constant is determined by the<br />

shape of the distributions <strong>and</strong> the definitions of the width (i.e., the resolution) of the frequency<br />

<strong>and</strong> time distributions.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!