05.01.2013 Views

Perceptual Coherence : Hearing and Seeing

Perceptual Coherence : Hearing and Seeing

Perceptual Coherence : Hearing and Seeing

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The Perception of Quality: Visual Color 307<br />

Now we can substitute equation 7.6a for [E(λ)] <strong>and</strong> equation 7.6b for<br />

[R b (λ)] to create the rather complex equation:<br />

Excitation cone M =Σ[S m(λ)][ε 1E 1(λ) +ε 2E 2(λ)<br />

+ε 3 E 3 (λ)][αR 1 (λ) +βR 2 (λ) +γR 3 (λ)]. (7.8)<br />

The basis functions for illumination multiplied by the basis functions for<br />

reflectance create the excitation for each cone system at each wavelength.<br />

The excitation is multiplied by the absorption curve to yield the firing rate.<br />

There would be analogous equations for the two other cones.<br />

To estimate the surface color, we need to derive the surface descriptors<br />

α, β, <strong>and</strong> γ. But to estimate the color, the observer simultaneously must<br />

figure out the illumination. The difficulty is that there are more unknowns<br />

than data points. There are three unknowns for the illumination (one value<br />

for each of the three basis functions), <strong>and</strong> there are three unknowns for<br />

the body reflectance (one value for each basis function). However, there are<br />

only three known values, one for the excitation of each cone system. The<br />

indeterminacy problem gets worse if more basis functions are needed to<br />

model reflectance or if the surface is not uniform. Now, the indeterminacy<br />

occurs at each point. All color models basically begin with three equations<br />

like equation 7.8, one for each cone system. Each model described below<br />

makes slightly different simplifying assumptions to achieve a solution.<br />

Before considering specific color models, it is worthwhile to consider<br />

the advantage of thinking about color constancy in terms of the linear sums<br />

of excitation <strong>and</strong> reflectance basis functions. Linear models represent a priori<br />

hypotheses about the likely set of inputs <strong>and</strong>, to the extent that the visual<br />

system has evolved to pick up those likely inputs, the perceptual<br />

inference problem becomes more tractable. Given that the illumination can<br />

be described with three basis functions, then we can calculate the relative<br />

amounts of each illumination basis function from the excitation of the<br />

three cones. Similarly, given that the reflectances of most objects can be<br />

adequately described with three basis functions, we can calculate the relative<br />

amounts of each reflectance basis function from the excitation of the<br />

three cones. We are replacing the direct calculation of the continuous illumination<br />

<strong>and</strong> reflectance functions with the calculation of the relative<br />

amounts of the respective basis functions.<br />

Moreover, to the extent that the basis functions appear to be analogous to<br />

physiological or perceptual functions, we can argue indirectly that the basis<br />

functions underlie color constancy. For example, three basis functions have<br />

been found to represent surface reflectance for a set of Munsell colors (Cohen,<br />

1964). The first function is relatively flat across the wavelengths. The<br />

second function contrasts green with red, while the third function contrasts<br />

yellow mainly with blue <strong>and</strong> less strongly with red. Each basis function has<br />

one more reversal, mimicking basis functions described previously. Thus,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!