05.01.2013 Views

Perceptual Coherence : Hearing and Seeing

Perceptual Coherence : Hearing and Seeing

Perceptual Coherence : Hearing and Seeing

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The Perception of Quality: Visual Color 321<br />

In another type of asymmetric matching procedure, the test patch is<br />

achromatic, somewhere between white <strong>and</strong> black seen under normal daylight.<br />

Since achromatic colors (i.e., the grays) reflect all spectral wavelengths<br />

equally (termed spectrally nonselective), their reflected light will<br />

match the spectral properties of the illuminant. If the illuminant has more<br />

energy in the reds, then the achromatic patch will look reddish. The matching<br />

task requires the observer to use the adjustable projection colorimeter<br />

to add spectral energy to make the test patch look gray (again). The<br />

observer must adjust the colorimeter so that the reflected light from the<br />

achromatic patch, now based on the sum of the ambient <strong>and</strong> adjustable colorimeter<br />

spectral energies, would equal the reflectance of gray under normal<br />

daylight illumination (Brainard, 1998). To do so, the observer must use<br />

the reflected light from the st<strong>and</strong>ard patch <strong>and</strong> background to estimate the<br />

ambient illumination in order to adjust the colorimeter.<br />

A good starting point is experiments by Kraft <strong>and</strong> Brainard (1999) that<br />

made use of a highly realistic visual scene <strong>and</strong> that attempted to tease apart<br />

the contributions of various cues that have been hypothesized to account<br />

for color constancy. Observers looked into a test chamber that contained a<br />

flat panel composed of 24 different colored squares, a tube wrapped in tinfoil<br />

that could produce specular reflection <strong>and</strong> thereby illuminate other<br />

parts of the scene by means of interreflections, <strong>and</strong> three-dimensional cube<br />

<strong>and</strong> pyramid shapes constructed from gray cardboard that could provide<br />

shadow cues (see figure 7.8). One wall of the chamber was covered with<br />

the same cardboard as used to construct the cube <strong>and</strong> pyramid. The dark<br />

gray test patch hung on the back wall. In all of the experiments, the observer’s<br />

task was to make the test patch look gray by manipulating the red,<br />

green, <strong>and</strong> blue beams of a hidden projector.<br />

The purpose of the experiment was to determine the relative importance<br />

of the various cues postulated to account for constancy. Prior to the actual<br />

experiment, Kraft <strong>and</strong> Brainard (1999) determined the maximum degree of<br />

constancy achievable in the “rich” test chamber <strong>and</strong> the minimum degree of<br />

constancy achievable when all cues were removed. The authors first maximized<br />

the cues for constancy. The experimental chamber was lined with the<br />

same gray background for the neutral illuminant <strong>and</strong> for the orange-red test<br />

illuminant. These combinations made the test patch look dark gray for the<br />

neutral illumination, but orange-red for the second illumination. In this<br />

case, observers easily adjusted the test patch to look gray under the orangered<br />

illuminant. The constancy index was 0.83, a remarkably high value.<br />

Kraft <strong>and</strong> Brainard then minimized the cues by removing all the objects<br />

(only the test patch remained) <strong>and</strong> comparing one condition in which the<br />

background was gray with a neutral illumination to a second condition<br />

in which the background was blue with an orange-red illumination (i.e.,<br />

the patch still looked orange-red). Here the local illumination from the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!