05.01.2013 Views

Perceptual Coherence : Hearing and Seeing

Perceptual Coherence : Hearing and Seeing

Perceptual Coherence : Hearing and Seeing

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

120 <strong>Perceptual</strong> <strong>Coherence</strong><br />

For example, Kubovy <strong>and</strong> Jordan (1979) built up a set of sounds, each<br />

composed of 12 harmonically related sine waves (e.g., 600, 800, 1000,...<br />

2800 Hz). They created 12 different tones, in which 11 of the 12 sine waves<br />

were in phase <strong>and</strong> 1 was out of phase. Kubovy <strong>and</strong> Jordan (1979) then presented<br />

sequences of the tones (at a presentation rate of about 3 tones per<br />

second) so that the out-of-phase wave either increased or decreased in frequency<br />

<strong>and</strong> listeners had to judge which direction occurred (a simple example<br />

of upward movement using four components would be: −+++, +−++,<br />

++−+, +++−). Listeners were able to judge the direction for sets of higherfrequency<br />

harmonics (e.g., 2200−2800 Hz) but were unable to judge<br />

direction for sets of lower-frequency harmonics (600–1200 Hz). It is not<br />

clear why this difference occurred. If the 12 stimuli were presented one at a<br />

time, no matter which sine wave was out of phase, the pitch did not change.<br />

Listeners matched the pitch of the complex tone to the same pure tone. The<br />

effects of phase were found only in sequences in which the phase shift<br />

moved across the frequency components of the complex sounds.<br />

Moreover, changing phase relationships among components of complex<br />

sounds led listeners to segment the sounds into sets of frequency components<br />

with constant phase relationships. Suppose we had two overlapping complex<br />

sounds with similar but not identical fundamental frequencies. Why should<br />

the two sounds separate? One possible answer is that the phase relationships<br />

within each sound would be invariant, but the phase relationships between the<br />

two sounds would shift over time because the fundamental frequencies were<br />

not identical, <strong>and</strong> that shift could be encoded by the phase-locked response to<br />

each sound. Similar to the work of Kubovy <strong>and</strong> Jordan (1979), it would be the<br />

changing phase relationships that are the perceptual information. 9<br />

I would argue that the effect of phase is identical for hearing <strong>and</strong> seeing.<br />

For static objects, the phase relationships do not affect periodicity but do<br />

affect quality, while for changing objects the phase relationships create stability<br />

<strong>and</strong> movement. (In chapter 5, I consider motion created by phase<br />

changes.) The ear is not phase-deaf <strong>and</strong> the eye is not phase-blind.<br />

Physiological Transformations That Maximize<br />

Information Transmission<br />

Given the statistical structure of the environment, what should be the optimal<br />

transformation of the proximal stimulus at the retina or at the cochlea into a<br />

neural signal? The answer depends on what we imagine the goals of sensory<br />

9. Listeners can make use of phase differences to localize sounds. If we present one tone<br />

to each ear by means of headphones <strong>and</strong> then gradually increase the phase difference between<br />

the tones, listeners report that the sound is circling their head.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!