05.01.2013 Views

Perceptual Coherence : Hearing and Seeing

Perceptual Coherence : Hearing and Seeing

Perceptual Coherence : Hearing and Seeing

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

350 <strong>Perceptual</strong> <strong>Coherence</strong><br />

The Steady State at Maximum Amplitude<br />

In reality, the sound at maximum intensity is not steady at all. There are dynamic<br />

changes in the frequency <strong>and</strong> amplitude of the vibration modes due<br />

to unstable physical processes as well as the performer’s intentions. We can<br />

derive measures that reflect both the average <strong>and</strong> dynamic properties in the<br />

steady-state segment.<br />

1. The most commonly used average property of the steady state is the<br />

spectral centroid, a measure of the energy distribution among the frequency<br />

components. A simple way of computing the spectral centroid is the<br />

weighted average of the amplitudes of the components:<br />

Spectral centroid frequency =∑a i f i / ∑ a i<br />

(8.2)<br />

where a i <strong>and</strong> f i are the amplitudes <strong>and</strong> frequencies of each harmonic or partial<br />

of the sound.<br />

While the spectral centroid captures the balance point of the amplitudes,<br />

it is incomplete because many different spectral distributions will yield the<br />

same frequency. For example, a sound with equal amplitudes at 400, 500,<br />

<strong>and</strong> 600 Hz will have the same centroid as a sound with equal amplitudes<br />

at 100, 500, <strong>and</strong> 900 Hz. Moreover, a sound with equal amplitude at every<br />

frequency component can have the same centroid as another sound with<br />

drastically unequal amplitudes at the component frequencies. For these reasons,<br />

several other measures have been used.<br />

2. The irregularity in amplitude among the spectral components is<br />

another way to characterize the steady state. For example, the relative<br />

strength of odd <strong>and</strong> even harmonics defines different types of horns, <strong>and</strong><br />

an extreme jaggedness of amplitudes indicates a complex resonance structure<br />

such as that found for stringed instruments. In addition, variation in<br />

the frequency ratios among the components can distinguish between<br />

continuously driven instruments (bowed strings, wind instruments, <strong>and</strong><br />

voices) <strong>and</strong> impulsive instruments (piano, plucked strings). J. C. Brown<br />

(1996) found that for continuously driven instruments, the components<br />

were phase-locked <strong>and</strong> the frequencies occurred at nearly integer ratios.<br />

For impulsive instruments, the components were not related by integer ratios.<br />

After the impulse, each vibration mode decayed independently, <strong>and</strong><br />

differences in damping caused the frequencies to deviate out of an integer<br />

relationship.<br />

3. The spectral spread of the amplitudes of the harmonics is yet another<br />

measure. Suppose we have two sounds with components at 100, 500, <strong>and</strong><br />

900 Hz. For the first sound the amplitudes are 1, 4, <strong>and</strong> 1, while for the second<br />

sound the amplitudes are 4, 1, <strong>and</strong> 4. The energy is spread more widely<br />

for the second sound, <strong>and</strong> the two sounds, in spite of identical centroids<br />

(500 Hz) <strong>and</strong> spectral irregularity, will sound different.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!