05.01.2013 Views

Perceptual Coherence : Hearing and Seeing

Perceptual Coherence : Hearing and Seeing

Perceptual Coherence : Hearing and Seeing

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

258 <strong>Perceptual</strong> <strong>Coherence</strong><br />

flashed light would be minimal. However, the multiplicative + subtractive<br />

adaptation processes reduce the response rate to the background light to<br />

such a degree that the dynamic range increases by as much as fivefold compared<br />

to the range if there were no adaptation processes.<br />

To summarize, background illumination uses up most of the ability of<br />

neurons to signal increments in intensity. Over time periods of roughly<br />

200–300 ms, multiplicative <strong>and</strong> subtractive mechanisms reduce the firing<br />

rate to the background so that a larger part of the response range can be<br />

used to signal changes in intensity. The multiplicative mechanism affects<br />

both the background <strong>and</strong> target, while the subtractive mechanism affects<br />

only the background, at least within a limited time span.<br />

A real example of the effects of multiplicative <strong>and</strong> subtractive mechanisms<br />

can be found in recordings of ganglion cells in the mudpuppy<br />

(Makous, 1997, taken from Werblin, 1974). In this example, the surround<br />

appeared to have a subtractive effect on the response to a flickering stimulus<br />

confined to the center mechanism of the ganglion cell. Experimentally,<br />

the flicker was continuous, <strong>and</strong> the surround was alternately on <strong>and</strong> off.<br />

Figure 6.8A shows that the alternation of the surround over time reduces<br />

the overall rate of response but, most important, the oscillation in output<br />

voltage generated by the flicker does not change. The membrane potential<br />

is plotted in figure 6.8B in terms of the intensity of the surround. Again, the<br />

important point is that the response function to the flicker with the surround<br />

on has the same slope <strong>and</strong> is merely shifted to the right. I would argue that<br />

this effect is mainly due to subtractive adaptation because the response to<br />

the flicker does not change at the different background intensities.<br />

Figure 6.8. The surround acts as a subtractive gain control in bipolar cells. The<br />

gain control maintains the response to the flicker modulation in spite of the increase<br />

in background intensity. From “Control of Retinal Sensitivity. II. Lateral Interactions<br />

at the Outer Plexiform Layer,” by F. S. Werblin, 1974, Journal of General<br />

Physiology, 63, 62–87. Copyright 1974 by the Journal of General Physiology.<br />

Reprinted with permission.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!