05.01.2013 Views

Perceptual Coherence : Hearing and Seeing

Perceptual Coherence : Hearing and Seeing

Perceptual Coherence : Hearing and Seeing

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

360 <strong>Perceptual</strong> <strong>Coherence</strong><br />

be dominant. Grey stated that longer notes yielded different multidimensional<br />

spatial configurations in which those temporal dimensions did not<br />

emerge.<br />

Another measure of spectral flux essentially refers to the change in the<br />

shape of the spectral envelope over time. This change could be due to variations<br />

in the source excitation, different damping of the filter’s resonance<br />

modes (see Freed, 1990, described above), or a performer’s use of vibrato,<br />

which creates both frequency <strong>and</strong> amplitude modulations. Such variation is<br />

easily perceived, <strong>and</strong> McAdams, Beauchamp, Meneguzzi (1999) demonstrated<br />

that listeners consistently discriminated between simulated instrumental<br />

sounds that contained normal spectral flux <strong>and</strong> those in which the<br />

flux was eliminated by making the ratios among pairs of harmonics constant<br />

across the sound duration. Moreover, Horner, Beauchamp, <strong>and</strong> So<br />

(2004) found that for instruments with high levels of spectral flux, it was<br />

difficult to detect added r<strong>and</strong>om alterations in the amplitude of the harmonics<br />

(an expected outcome from a signal detection perspective).<br />

However, spectral flux does not emerge consistently in the multidimensional<br />

solutions. For example, a measure of spectral variation was found to<br />

weakly correlate to the third dimension by McAdams et al. (1995), but<br />

such a measure was not found by Lakatos (2000) using sets of stimuli that<br />

might be expected to show that variation. Erickson (2003), using classically<br />

trained mezzo-soprano <strong>and</strong> soprano singers, found that rate of vibrato<br />

was weakly correlated to a third dimension for experienced choral directors,<br />

but not for inexperienced judges. The reason for this inconsistency<br />

may be the scaling method itself. The scaling procedure tries to find the<br />

minimum number of dimensions to account for the judged similarity, <strong>and</strong><br />

the predominant importance of the onset timing <strong>and</strong> the spectral centroid<br />

may hide the effect of spectral flux.<br />

In an identification task, Kendall (1986) completely eliminated the possibility<br />

of any spectral flux. Kendall isolated one cycle <strong>and</strong> then repeated<br />

that cycle continuously for the entire duration of the steady-state component.<br />

He found that identification of instruments was poorer for the singlecycle<br />

simulations than for the natural instrument. It appears that spectral<br />

flux is important for recognizing an instrument (or discriminating among<br />

simulated sounds) but not as relevant for judging similarity between<br />

sounds.<br />

Individual Differences<br />

In nearly all work to date, the differences between untrained <strong>and</strong> trained<br />

listeners (e.g., musicians, classical singers, choral directors) have been<br />

small <strong>and</strong> variable. For example, Lakatos (2000), using the same statistical<br />

procedure as McAdams et al. (1995), did not find any effects of musical

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!