05.01.2013 Views

Perceptual Coherence : Hearing and Seeing

Perceptual Coherence : Hearing and Seeing

Perceptual Coherence : Hearing and Seeing

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

386 <strong>Perceptual</strong> <strong>Coherence</strong><br />

Frequency<br />

The above cues seem more relevant to the grouping of simultaneous frequency<br />

components in a single sound than to grouping successive sounds<br />

as found in music. The question here is whether the series of sounds comes<br />

from one source or whether the series results from the interleaving of<br />

sounds from different sources. The basic methodology is to continuously<br />

recycle a small number of sounds <strong>and</strong> measure whether the listener hears<br />

all the sounds as coming from one source or whether the sounds appear<br />

to break into separate ongoing sound sequences, often termed streams,<br />

such that each stream seems to come from a different source. As Bregman<br />

(1990) has argued, the default percept is that of one stream, <strong>and</strong> switching<br />

the percept to that of different streams is cumulative <strong>and</strong> gradual over<br />

repetitions.<br />

In a classic set of experiments, van Noorden (1975) presented sequences<br />

at different presentation rates that simply alternated two pure tones at<br />

different frequencies (also discussed in chapter 5). Listeners reported simply<br />

whether they heard the two tones alternate like a trill or whether the<br />

notes formed a low-note sequence <strong>and</strong> a separate high-note sequence. These<br />

sequences place temporal proximity (adjacent notes) in conflict with frequency<br />

similarity (alternate notes of the same frequency).<br />

The results demonstrated an inverse relationship between rate <strong>and</strong><br />

frequency ratio. Increasing either the presentation rate or the frequency<br />

separation (or both) increases the probability of hearing the two tones as<br />

separate streams. Conversely, decreasing the rate or frequency separation<br />

increases the probability of hearing the tones as forming a single coherent<br />

stream. At intermediate values of rate or frequency separation, the tendency<br />

to hear the tones as forming one or two streams can be affected by the<br />

listener’s attention. Bregman et al. (2000) have shown that it is not the rate<br />

per se that affects grouping; it is the gap between the offset of one note <strong>and</strong><br />

the onset of the next one in the same frequency region, the temporal separation.<br />

The tendency to form a coherent stream can be enhanced by connecting<br />

the low- <strong>and</strong> high-frequency tone by a frequency glide between the two<br />

tones.<br />

Bregman (1990) made an extremely important distinction about the<br />

asymmetry in auditory grouping from the results of van Noorden’s experiment.<br />

It always is possible to attend to either tone at all presentation<br />

rates as long as the frequency separation between the low <strong>and</strong> high tones<br />

allows them to be discriminated apart. In contrast, it is impossible to<br />

maintain the perception of a single alternating sequence once the combination<br />

of frequency separation <strong>and</strong> presentation rate reach a certain point.<br />

There is an obligatory split into low <strong>and</strong> high tone streams. On this basis<br />

<strong>and</strong> others, Bregman argued that we have primitive segregation processes

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!