05.01.2013 Views

Perceptual Coherence : Hearing and Seeing

Perceptual Coherence : Hearing and Seeing

Perceptual Coherence : Hearing and Seeing

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

402 <strong>Perceptual</strong> <strong>Coherence</strong><br />

by columns even when the distances between the beads favored row organization<br />

(i.e., at the observer’s eye, the distance between the beads in a row<br />

was less than the distance between beads in a column). In contrast, if the<br />

observers viewed the display with one eye <strong>and</strong> poor depth information so<br />

that they were more likely to perceive the array as being squashed, the<br />

grouping shifted to organization by rows at the angle at which the proximal<br />

distances favored the row organization. In both cases then, the perceived<br />

proximity inferred from the perceived orientation of the surface (in depth,<br />

or not in depth) was the basis for grouping.<br />

In a similar experiment, Rock, Nijhawan, Palmer, <strong>and</strong> Tudor (1992)<br />

demonstrated that it was perceived lightness, not the proximal luminance,<br />

that determined grouping. In the control condition, there were five columns,<br />

each with four squares of equal reflectance (see figure 9.15A). In the baseline<br />

condition, the three left columns had a greater reflectance (68.4%) than<br />

the two on the right (17.6%), <strong>and</strong> observers obviously grouped the three left<br />

columns together. In the experimental condition (B), the authors placed a<br />

translucent plastic strip over the central column so that the reflectance of the<br />

center column equaled the two on the right (to 17.6%). Following the same<br />

logic as before, if the observers grouped on the basis of the physical energy<br />

reaching their eyes, they would group the central column with the two on<br />

the right. However, they continued to group the middle column with the two<br />

on the left. The observers first compensated for the effect of the filter, <strong>and</strong><br />

then grouped on the basis of perceived lightness. They were able to compensate<br />

for the darkening effect of the filter because the filter extended the<br />

entire length of the column <strong>and</strong> simultaneously darkened the background<br />

<strong>and</strong> boundary. The grouping was indirect, following the adjustment for the<br />

Figure 9.15. Perceived lightness, not proximal lightness, determines organization.<br />

Observers were able to compensate for the translucent shadow shown in (B), <strong>and</strong><br />

judged the middle column to group with the two left-most columns. Adapted from<br />

“Grouping Based on Phenomenal Similarity of Achromatic Color,” by I. Rock,<br />

R. Nijhawan, S. E. Palmer, <strong>and</strong> L. Tudor, 1992, Perception, 21, 779–789.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!