02.02.2013 Views

Whale Watching Worldwide

Whale Watching Worldwide

Whale Watching Worldwide

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

February 2009 for consistency. Despite care being<br />

taken, fluctuations in global currencies against the<br />

US dollar will lead to some distortion of the value of<br />

whale watching in certain countries and therefore<br />

make comparison from year to year difficult. This is<br />

further justification for growth calculations based<br />

on whale watch numbers rather than dollar values.<br />

Additionally, due to these currency fluctuations,<br />

dollar values for the industry should be seen as<br />

indicative rather than precise.<br />

Employment Levels<br />

To calculate regional and global employment<br />

estimates for the global whale watching industry,<br />

regional revenue‐per‐employee figures were<br />

calculated where data was available (i.e. from<br />

Limitations<br />

The data in this report provide an estimation of the<br />

economic contribution of the whale watching<br />

industry to countries around the globe from an<br />

expenditure basis and is provided as best available<br />

data within the limits of scope, time and budget. In<br />

light of this, the data reported within is provided as<br />

an estimate of the size of the whale watching<br />

industry across the world, and is best used to<br />

identify trends rather than precise numbers.<br />

Data for this report were collected through a survey<br />

process and desktop review of available<br />

information, and as such depends on those primary<br />

and secondary sources for its reliability. There was<br />

no on‐the‐ground data collection or verification<br />

undertaken by Economists at Large. Instead local<br />

in‐country sources were used to verify data in all<br />

operator survey results). From these regional<br />

revenue‐per‐employee figures, we then estimated<br />

the employment levels for countries where actual<br />

employee estimates were unavailable. Estimates<br />

were calculated by dividing direct expenditure<br />

(revenue) by the regional revenue‐per‐employee<br />

calculations. From this, country level employment,<br />

regional and then global employment estimates<br />

were calculated.<br />

For these purposes, employment does not<br />

distinguish between permanent and seasonal<br />

employment; it is based on full‐time equivalent<br />

employment levels.<br />

countries. For all data used in this report, a variety<br />

of sources were consulted in order to calculate<br />

average values. Where possible, data are averaged<br />

across operator survey responses, tourism data and<br />

other stakeholder discussions.<br />

As mentioned above, currency conversions across<br />

the significant number of countries covered in this<br />

report can lead to some distortions in the dollar<br />

values reported. This is particularly the case at the<br />

time of writing due to the high volatility of<br />

currencies during the global financial crisis. To<br />

mitigate for this, growth is based on tourist<br />

numbers, not expenditure values.<br />

This report reflects the views of the authors<br />

Economists at Large.<br />

35

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!