15.02.2013 Views

Leticia Neria PhD thesis - Research@StAndrews:FullText ...

Leticia Neria PhD thesis - Research@StAndrews:FullText ...

Leticia Neria PhD thesis - Research@StAndrews:FullText ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

We also saw how films and comics could be understood as creators of a partial<br />

reality, or as possible worlds whose messages amounted to allegories of our own world.<br />

In spite of the caricatured images and the absurdity of the stories, films and comics<br />

created their own universe. They made their own narrative plausible. We compared<br />

them with our own reality. Through these analyses we found that the idea of studying a<br />

society through its expressions of humour made sense. We noticed how humour went<br />

beyond the idea of amusement and denial of reality and in fact brought us face to face<br />

with very serious issues. We laughed even while we noticed that the absurd world being<br />

portrayed was in fact our reality. At first glance, humour and visual media seem like<br />

simple entertainment. But their social content has a social good: seeing such content<br />

expressed openly can be very comforting.<br />

In a time in which the government spoke of tolerance and opening, it should not<br />

be surprising to find criticism in the media. But the government’s words were empty<br />

rhetoric; they continued hunting, punishing, torturing and even killing their opponents.<br />

In a period in which there was low tolerance to criticism, the channels of expression<br />

were reduced. To express dissent was dangerous, and humour became the ideal<br />

language to express disagreement; it was a way to ‘disguise’ our real judgments,<br />

improving the chances of the message being received and punishment being avoided.<br />

Thus, society found a way to complain. They saw their daily concerns and fears<br />

played out in humorous films and comics. Echeverría did allow some criticism, and<br />

although not all criticism expressed through these media was well-received or went<br />

without penalty, the odds of escaping unscathed were greater. The proof is that these<br />

films and comics were released and their content was made available for public<br />

consumption. Nevertheless, their thoughts were diluted by being embedded into wider<br />

stories, narratives that were not political. Tívoli and Calzonzin Inspector were the only<br />

241

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!