14.05.2013 Views

Carta del director - Universidad de El Salvador

Carta del director - Universidad de El Salvador

Carta del director - Universidad de El Salvador

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

analyses utilizing a combination of<br />

NAA and petrological methods,<br />

however, have given us more in<strong>de</strong>pth<br />

information regarding general<br />

geographical manufacture<br />

zones and, potential hints toward,<br />

distribution patterns [Bishop et.<br />

al., 1988, 1992]. Our ongoing research<br />

project is aimed toward<br />

using this same combination of archaeometric<br />

techniques in or<strong>de</strong>r<br />

to garner a better un<strong>de</strong>rstanding<br />

of Tempisque period materials—<br />

a chronological time period that<br />

has never been studied utilizing<br />

these methods. While we anticipate<br />

equally interesting and informative<br />

results from the NAA analysis<br />

of our sample sherds (currently<br />

being conducted by Ron Bishop<br />

of the Smithsonian Institution), we<br />

are unable to report on this aspect<br />

at this time. Here in we report<br />

the petrological component of<br />

the analysis.<br />

Methodology<br />

The analyses utilized in this project<br />

involves a combination of wellestablished<br />

quantitative (point<br />

counting) and qualitative (examination<br />

of lithic and mineral inclusions<br />

utilizing optical microscopy)<br />

techniques for <strong>de</strong>scribing and<br />

interpreting the composition of<br />

archaeological ceramic fabrics.<br />

Quantitative analysis of the sam-<br />

ples was completed by Platz and<br />

Dennett utilizing standard point<br />

counting procedures [Bishop et<br />

al., 1982; Stoltman, 1989, 1991].<br />

This method involves the measurement<br />

and classification (lithic<br />

vs. mineral) of the grain size of<br />

inclusions in the paste using a 1 x<br />

1 micrometer grid superimposed<br />

on the sli<strong>de</strong> to obtain a random,<br />

representative sample. Grain inclusions<br />

less than 0.02 mm are<br />

categorized as matrix (inclusions<br />

presumed native to the clay), 0.02<br />

to 0.55 mm as silt, 0.55 to 2 mm as<br />

sand, and anything larger is consi<strong>de</strong>red<br />

gravel. The results of point<br />

counting procedures should aid<br />

the ceramic analyst in potentially<br />

distinguishing unique ‘paste recipes’<br />

and constructing basic research<br />

questions which can then<br />

be addressed and/or clarified<br />

through qualitative petrological<br />

<strong>de</strong>scription. Qualitative analysis<br />

of the samples was completed by<br />

Dennett using standard petrological<br />

optical microscopy procedures<br />

<strong>de</strong>signed to i<strong>de</strong>ntify and <strong>de</strong>scribe<br />

the different types of mineral<br />

and lithic inclusions present in the<br />

fabric [Bishop et al., 1982].<br />

La <strong>Universidad</strong> 379

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!