02.04.2013 Views

The impact of urban groundwater upon surface water - eTheses ...

The impact of urban groundwater upon surface water - eTheses ...

The impact of urban groundwater upon surface water - eTheses ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

GROUNDWATER FLOW TO THE RIVER TAME<br />

rainfall. In the same way, catchment recharge was calculated as 29% at Bescot and 20% at<br />

Calthorpe. <strong>The</strong>se values will incorporate leakage from <strong>water</strong> mains in addition to recharge<br />

from precipitation. <strong>The</strong> 1999 yearly discharge to the main channel, derived from the<br />

Birmingham Aquifer directly, was approximated as 8.86 x10 6 m 3 yr -1 based on the sandstone<br />

underlying a reach length <strong>of</strong> 7.4 km from the total <strong>of</strong> 23.8km. <strong>The</strong> total contribution from the<br />

aquifer as a whole may be significantly larger with a flow <strong>of</strong> 1.66 x10 7 m 3 yr -1 from the Rea<br />

and 8.32 x10 6 m 3 yr -1 from the lesser tributaries, which drain the aquifer and are <strong>ground<strong>water</strong></strong><br />

fed.<br />

5.3.3 River Flow Gauging<br />

In order to determine the level <strong>of</strong> baseflow accretion, river flow gauging was undertaken.<br />

Measurements were carried out on ten separate days <strong>of</strong> dry weather flow during the period<br />

7/7/99 to 23/5/01 at different points on the river between Bescot and Water Orton. An<br />

increase in flow across the reach is evident (Figure 5.8, Appendix 9) with base flow accretion<br />

ranging from 1x10 -4 m 3 s -1 (8.6 m 3 d -1 ) to 3x10 -5 m 3 s -1 (2.6 m 3 d -1 ) per metre length <strong>of</strong> channel.<br />

Taking into account known DWF discharges <strong>of</strong> 10.3 Mld -1 , <strong>ground<strong>water</strong></strong> discharge from the<br />

aquifer directly to the channel ranges between 1.2 m 3 d -1 and 7.2 m 3 d -1 per metre <strong>of</strong> channel.<br />

Several <strong>of</strong> the data series (e.g.02/06/00) fluctuate, sometimes displaying a fall in discharge<br />

levels downstream, indicating either that the river is not under steady dry weather flow<br />

conditions or an error in the flow measurements. <strong>The</strong>re does not appear to be any obvious rise<br />

in accretion levels across the aquifer compared with the other types <strong>of</strong> bedrock geology (coal<br />

measures and the mudstones). This may be due to insufficient data coverage or perhaps it is<br />

an indication that the drift, in particular the alluvial gravel which is present along the entire<br />

length <strong>of</strong> the study reach, is controlling <strong>ground<strong>water</strong></strong> flow to the river. <strong>The</strong> most recent data<br />

were recorded on consecutive days (22 nd - 23 rd May 2001) and exhibit consistent discharges<br />

121

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!