02.04.2013 Views

The impact of urban groundwater upon surface water - eTheses ...

The impact of urban groundwater upon surface water - eTheses ...

The impact of urban groundwater upon surface water - eTheses ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

WATER QUALITY INTERACTIONS<br />

value <strong>of</strong> Koc a mean retardation factor <strong>of</strong> 58 may be calculated for the riverbed , ranging from<br />

5 to 465 depending on the fraction <strong>of</strong> organic carbon. Estimates <strong>of</strong> linear discharge velocities<br />

from the field measurements and modelling indicate maximum velocities >5 md -1 (effective<br />

porosity 0.2), most likely through the channel sides, with discharge through the central<br />

riverbed ~50 cmd -1 . <strong>The</strong> mean residence time for PCE across a vertical 2m section <strong>of</strong> riverbed<br />

may be as high as 232 days, with extremes ranging from 2 to 1860 days depending on<br />

<strong>ground<strong>water</strong></strong> velocity and fOC content. This has implications regarding whether biodegradation<br />

has time to occur within the riverbed prior to contaminant discharge.<br />

<strong>The</strong> plume detected at Pr<strong>of</strong>ile 8 discharges across a 4 m section <strong>of</strong> the riverbed (Figure 7.25 a<br />

and b) showing a similar distribution to the elevated levels <strong>of</strong> fluoride, sulphate and nitrate.<br />

<strong>The</strong> main components <strong>of</strong> the plume are TCE and 1,1-TCA with minor amounts <strong>of</strong> 1,2-DCE,<br />

1,1-DCE, 1,1-DCA, TCM PCE, VC, and bromodichloride. TCE and TCA have similar lateral<br />

and vertical (Figure 7.26 a) distributions within the channel and show a considerable temporal<br />

variation in concentration, dropping by half between the summer and winter levels. This fall<br />

in concentration was also detected in the inorganic quality data with fluoride, sulphate and<br />

nitrate following a similar trend between summer and autumn in both 2000 and 2001 (Figure<br />

7.8). This may be a seasonal trend related to the changes in the recharge rate and <strong>ground<strong>water</strong></strong><br />

levels. <strong>The</strong>se may affect the level <strong>of</strong> dilution within the plume and <strong>ground<strong>water</strong></strong> flow rates,<br />

and flow direction through the source zone. However, the contaminant travel time from the<br />

source zone to the river is unknown, making it difficult to relate the sampling time directly to<br />

any temporal variability in the source. Another explanation for the temporal variability may<br />

be that the direction <strong>of</strong> plume migration changes the high concentrations <strong>of</strong> the plume centre<br />

being sampled in the summer, but the lower concentration fringes <strong>of</strong> the plume being sampled<br />

301

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!