02.04.2013 Views

The impact of urban groundwater upon surface water - eTheses ...

The impact of urban groundwater upon surface water - eTheses ...

The impact of urban groundwater upon surface water - eTheses ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

GROUNDWATER FLUX<br />

attenuation may be particularly important for the chlorinated solvents and heavy metals which<br />

display concentrations in the discharging <strong>ground<strong>water</strong></strong> which are lower than other data such as<br />

abstraction well sampling and estimates <strong>of</strong> recharge loading suggest. Further investigation is<br />

required to determine if the most significant natural attenuation occurs within the source zone,<br />

the aquifer or the riverbed.<br />

Agreement between the different methods <strong>of</strong> mass flux estimation varied between<br />

determinands but values were generally within one order <strong>of</strong> magnitude <strong>of</strong> each other. For<br />

example, annual mass flux calculated from baseflow analyses and riverbed piezometer data<br />

for Ca, Cl, TCE and Zn were 1,300,000, 1,270,000, 95 and 719 kgy -1 respectively. This<br />

compares with 1,450,000 (Ca), 1,170,000 (Cl) and 183 (TCE) kgy -1 calculated from the<br />

combined <strong>surface</strong> <strong>water</strong> sampling and discharge measurements. <strong>The</strong> mass flux <strong>of</strong> Zn<br />

estimated from the regular Environment Agency <strong>surface</strong> <strong>water</strong> sampling ranged between 897<br />

and 1,762 kgy -1 . <strong>The</strong> calculations are based on limited data sets and further work is required<br />

to assess the requirements for sample density. Some <strong>of</strong> the contaminants (e.g. F, TCA) may<br />

receive a significant contribution to the total mass flux from a single plume while other<br />

contamination (e.g. NO3) is more diffuse. Very detailed investigations are required for<br />

individual plumes to obtain an accurate estimate <strong>of</strong> mass flux. However, based on limited<br />

calculations, none <strong>of</strong> the plumes by itself will raise <strong>surface</strong> <strong>water</strong> concentrations above the<br />

EQS limits and the principal <strong>impact</strong> <strong>of</strong> the plume will be on the ecology within the specific<br />

discharge zone where locally high concentrations may exist prior to dilution by <strong>surface</strong> <strong>water</strong>.<br />

All the methods <strong>of</strong> <strong>ground<strong>water</strong></strong> flux estimation should be used in conjunction, as none in<br />

isolation is sufficient to assess the <strong>impact</strong> <strong>of</strong> the <strong>ground<strong>water</strong></strong> on the <strong>surface</strong> <strong>water</strong> quality in<br />

342

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!