02.04.2013 Views

The impact of urban groundwater upon surface water - eTheses ...

The impact of urban groundwater upon surface water - eTheses ...

The impact of urban groundwater upon surface water - eTheses ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

GROUNDWATER FLUX<br />

an <strong>urban</strong> setting. Direct measurement <strong>of</strong> changes in discharge and concentration along the<br />

river provides mass flux in the <strong>surface</strong> <strong>water</strong> but includes inputs from sources other than the<br />

<strong>ground<strong>water</strong></strong> and is susceptible to the temporal variations in pipe discharges. Riverbed<br />

piezometers directly measure the concentrations in the <strong>ground<strong>water</strong></strong> discharging to the river<br />

and are useful for delineating localised areas <strong>of</strong> plume discharge which <strong>surface</strong> <strong>water</strong><br />

sampling does not. However, the mass flux calculation relies on estimates <strong>of</strong> <strong>ground<strong>water</strong></strong><br />

flow rather than direct measurements, and a wide range in estimated flows may be calculated<br />

depending on the method used (Chapters 6 and 7). River baseflow and <strong>ground<strong>water</strong></strong> discharge<br />

display considerable temporal variation through the year and it is necessary to take this into<br />

account by using continuous discharge monitoring. This may be combined with continuous<br />

EC measurements so as to estimate the variability in <strong>surface</strong> <strong>water</strong> mass flux.<br />

Ideally, continuous discharge and EC data would be available from the upstream and<br />

downstream boundary <strong>of</strong> the aquifer and from the major <strong>surface</strong> discharges such as tributaries<br />

and sewage treatment works. Regular <strong>surface</strong> <strong>water</strong> sampling could be conducted at the<br />

gauged points and converted directly to a <strong>surface</strong> <strong>water</strong> chemical mass flux. <strong>The</strong> increase in<br />

<strong>surface</strong> <strong>water</strong> mass flux at points across the aquifer could be determined more accurately from<br />

the combined sampling and discharge measurements if the temporal variations in mass flux<br />

entering the upstream limit <strong>of</strong> the study reach were known. <strong>The</strong>se measurements could be<br />

combined with a <strong>surface</strong> <strong>water</strong> tracer test (Kimball et al., 2002) to reduce the uncertainty in<br />

the results. <strong>The</strong> riverbed piezometer monitoring network should be extended to identify any<br />

narrow, high concentration, plumes that may have been missed, and to provide more reliable<br />

mean <strong>ground<strong>water</strong></strong> concentrations. Geostatistical analyses should be performed to determine<br />

the optimum sample density. Further investigation is necessary on the sensitivity <strong>of</strong> the<br />

343

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!